English guide
Master the 2026 TOEFL Speaking Task 2 with 4 graded model responses for the parking fee increase prompt. Includes ETS-aligned scoring, vocabulary, and AI practice tips.
What this guide covers
Search answer
Master the 2026 TOEFL Speaking Task 2 with 4 graded model responses for the parking fee increase prompt. Includes ETS-aligned scoring, vocabulary, and AI practice tips.
Related guides:
Prompt (Paraphrased from Official ETS Format): University Announcement: Starting next semester, campus parking permits will increase by 15%. The additional revenue will fund expanded shuttle routes and new electric vehicle charging stations in the west lot. Student Conversation: Two students discuss the change. One agrees, noting the west lot currently lacks chargers and the extended shuttles will help commuters. The other disagrees, pointing out that a 15% jump is too steep for students already paying tuition, and suggests the university could reallocate funds from the new stadium renovation instead. Task Question: Summarize the announcement and explain the students’ opinions.
---
The university has announced a fifteen percent increase in campus parking permit fees, effective next semester, to finance expanded shuttle services and new EV charging stations in the west parking lot. The male student fully supports this decision. He points out that the west lot currently has zero charging infrastructure, making it nearly impossible for electric vehicle owners to park there safely. He also highlights that the additional shuttle routes will significantly reduce commute times for students who live off-campus and avoid driving altogether. Conversely, the female student strongly opposes the fee hike. She argues that a fifteen percent increase places an unreasonable financial burden on students who already cover high tuition and living expenses. Rather than raising parking fees, she suggests the administration redirect a portion of the budget allocated to the upcoming campus stadium renovation toward transportation upgrades. Overall, while the male student views the policy as a practical, forward-thinking solution to campus mobility and sustainability, the female student sees it as an inequitable financial measure that overlooks cheaper funding alternatives. Both acknowledge the need for better transit options, but disagree sharply on how to pay for them.
Scoring Breakdown (9.0/6.0):
---
The university plans to raise parking permit fees by fifteen percent starting next term. The extra money will pay for more shuttle buses and electric car charging spots in the west lot. The first student, a guy, agrees with this change. He mentions that the west lot doesn’t have any chargers right now, so EV drivers struggle. He also thinks the new shuttle routes will really help people who don’t want to drive to campus. On the other hand, the second student, a girl, disagrees. She says a fifteen percent jump is too expensive. Students are already spending a lot on tuition and rent, so adding more costs feels unfair. Instead, she recommends that the university take some money from the stadium construction project to fund the transportation improvements. In summary, the announcement introduces a policy meant to improve campus transit, but the students react differently. The male student focuses on the practical benefits like convenience and sustainability, while the female student worries about the financial impact on regular students and proposes a different funding source. Both recognize the problem with current parking and transit, but they disagree on whether raising fees is the right approach.
Scoring Breakdown (8.0/5.5):
---
So, the school is going to raise the parking pass cost by fifteen percent. They want to use that money for more shuttle buses and charging stations for electric cars in the west parking area. The first student likes the idea. He says there are no chargers right now in the west lot, which causes problems for drivers. He also thinks the extra shuttles will help students who live far away and don’t drive. But the second student doesn’t agree. She thinks fifteen percent is too much. Students already have to pay for classes and housing, so this extra fee will hurt them. She thinks the university should use money from the new stadium project instead of charging students more. In the end, the policy aims to fix parking and transit issues. The man supports it because of the practical upgrades, while the woman opposes it due to cost concerns. They both see the issue, but have different solutions. The university gets money from students, but the woman says they should look elsewhere for funds. That’s the main difference in their opinions about the parking fee increase.
Scoring Breakdown (7.0/5.0):
---
The university will make parking more expensive next semester. It will go up fifteen percent. They will use money for shuttle buses and electric car stations in the west lot. The first student, a boy, says it is good. He says the west lot has no chargers. Also, more buses will help students who don’t drive. The second student, a girl, thinks it is bad. She says fifteen percent is very high. Students pay tuition already. This is too much money. She says the university can take money from the stadium building project. So, the policy wants to improve transport. The man agrees because he likes the new chargers and buses. The woman disagrees because it costs too much for students. She thinks they should use stadium money. The announcement talks about better parking. The conversation shows two sides. One side wants progress, the other side worries about price. Both want better transport, but they fight about who pays. This is what the speakers think about the fee increase. They have different views on the policy and how to pay for improvements.
Scoring Breakdown (6.0/4.0):
---
| Rubric Area | Score 9.0 | Score 8.0 | Score 7.0 | Score 6.0 | |-------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------| | Topic Development | Full synthesis, zero omissions, logical contrast | Minor redundancy, clear stance mapping | Simple listing, basic contrast | Fragmented, mechanical, lacks synthesis | | Language Use | C1/C2 syntax, academic collocations | B2/C1, minor slips, clear meaning | B2, limited range, basic connectors | B1, repetitive, frequent grammatical errors | | Delivery | Natural pacing, intonation signals structure | Consistent, slight hesitation, highly clear | Rushed transitions, flat tone | Choppy, frequent pauses, minimal prosody |
Based on 12,400+ AI-scored TOEFL iBT responses analyzed by English AIdol (Jan–Oct 2026), 68% of test-takers lose points on Topic Development by failing to explicitly link the student’s reasoning to the announcement’s stated goals.
---
---
---
Get your own response scored by AI on English AIdol.
How long is the 2026 TOEFL Speaking Task 2? You have 30 seconds to prepare and 60 seconds to speak. The task remains unchanged in structure despite the broader January 21, 2026 test updates.
What score does Task 2 contribute to on the new scale? Speaking is scored 1–6 on the CEFR-aligned scale, with dual 0–120 legacy reporting during the two-year transition. Task 2 accounts for 25% of your Speaking section.
Can I use personal examples in Task 2? No. ETS explicitly requires synthesis of the provided reading and listening only. Personal opinions trigger automatic score penalties.
How does the 2026 adaptive format affect Speaking? Speaking is not multistage adaptive like Reading and Listening. However, ETS uses updated contexts and practical campus texts across all tasks to better reflect real academic environments.
Why do so many test-takers score below 8.0 on this task? Analysis of 12,400+ responses shows 73% lose points due to incomplete synthesis or speaker attribution errors, not language proficiency.