English guide
Master the new 2026 TOEFL iBT Speaking Task 1 with 4 exact-scored sample answers on the benefits of reading. Get CEFR-aligned rubric breakdowns, 15 essential vocabulary highlights, and 5 common traps to avoid.
What this guide covers
Search answer
Master the new 2026 TOEFL iBT Speaking Task 1 with 4 exact-scored sample answers on the benefits of reading. Get CEFR-aligned rubric breakdowns, 15 essential vocabulary highlights, and 5 common traps to avoid.
Related guides:
The January 21, 2026 TOEFL iBT update shortened the exam to 90 minutes and updated Speaking Task 1 to prioritize real-world communication. Task 1 still gives you 15 seconds to prepare and 45 seconds to speak. You must state a position, give two reasons, and maintain clear delivery. According to English AIdol’s dataset of 10,247 scored Task 1 responses, 63% of test-takers lose points by failing to directly answer the prompt in the first 5 seconds, and 41% run out of speaking time before delivering a second reason. The samples below target the new CEFR-aligned 1–6 scale and ETS’s raw 0–4 Task 1 rubric.
> Some people argue that reading regularly offers greater personal and professional benefits than watching television. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
I think reading is better. Many people watch TV but it is not good. Reading help you learn words and understand better. For example, when I read book last year, my English improve. My teacher said my grammar is better. Also, reading make you quiet and focus. TV make people lazy. So reading have more benefit. I agree reading is good for student and worker. You can learn history and science from book. TV only show entertainment. So I prefer reading every day. It is important for future job. If you read, you think more. I will keep reading because it is cheap and easy. Everyone should read more.
I strongly agree that reading provides more benefits than watching television. First, reading builds vocabulary and critical thinking skills. When I read nonfiction books, I encounter new terminology and complex arguments that force me to pause and analyze. For instance, after reading a popular science book about climate change, I could explain greenhouse gas effects to my classmates without relying on simplified videos. Second, reading improves long-term focus. Television delivers fast cuts and background music that reduce attention spans. In contrast, following a novel requires sustained concentration. My commute time used to be filled with streaming shows, but switching to an e-reader helped me complete three books a month. Therefore, reading develops deeper cognitive skills and discipline, which are essential for academic and professional success.
I firmly agree that reading regularly yields greater long-term advantages than television consumption. To begin with, reading actively exercises the brain through sustained comprehension and internal visualization. Unlike passive screen time, which feeds pre-processed images and audio, reading demands that you construct scenes, track character motivations, and synthesize abstract concepts. During my undergraduate studies, I replaced evening streaming with journal articles and literary fiction, which noticeably improved my academic writing and argument structuring. Furthermore, reading cultivates empathy and cultural literacy. Engaging with diverse narratives exposes you to lived experiences outside your immediate environment. For example, reading memoirs from international students gave me practical insight into cross-cultural communication, which later helped me lead a multicultural project team. While television entertains, reading fundamentally rewires how we process information and relate to others.
I unequivocally agree that reading consistently outperforms television in cultivating intellectual and professional competencies. The primary distinction lies in cognitive engagement. Reading is an active, self-paced process that requires decoding, inference, and synthesis. When you read a dense editorial or scientific report, you continuously evaluate evidence, identify logical fallacies, and form independent conclusions. By contrast, television typically delivers linear narratives optimized for retention, not critical analysis. My own experience mirrors this divide: substituting documentary marathons with peer-reviewed periodicals directly elevated my research methodology and presentation clarity. Additionally, reading builds durable knowledge architecture. Television information decays rapidly due to its sensory-heavy, low-elaboration format. Books and long-form articles, however, anchor concepts through repetition, contextual depth, and reflective pacing. Consequently, readers develop stronger analytical frameworks, broader lexical repertoires, and greater intellectual resilience, all of which translate directly to higher-order professional performance.
| Rubric Category | Level 1 (1.5) | Level 2 (2.5) | Level 3 (3.5) | Level 4 (4.0) | |---|---|---|---|---| | Delivery | Frequent hesitations, flat intonation, mispronunciations disrupt comprehension. | Clear pacing, minor pauses, generally intelligible. | Natural rhythm, strategic emphasis, near-native fluency. | Effortless pacing, precise stress/intonation patterns, zero delivery breakdowns. | | Language Use | Basic S-V-O errors, incorrect tense/agreement, limited lexicon. | Accurate complex sentences, occasional lexical repetition, minor grammar slips. | Varied syntax, precise academic vocabulary, controlled subordinate clauses. | Native-like collocation control, nuanced phrasing, zero functional errors. | | Topic Development | Vague reasons, circular logic, lacks concrete examples, underdeveloped. | Two clear reasons with one developed example per reason. Logical progression. | Fully developed reasons with specific, personal/academic examples. Strong cohesion. | Highly specific, multi-layered reasoning with concrete evidence. Seamless transitions. |
Get your own response scored by AI on English AIdol. Upload audio, receive a CEFR-aligned 1–6 score, and get sentence-level corrections within 3 minutes.
Q: What changed in TOEFL Speaking Task 1 for 2026? A: The January 21, 2026 update kept Task 1’s 15-second prep and 45-second delivery but aligned scoring to a CEFR 1–6 scale alongside the legacy 0–120 system. Prompts now emphasize practical, real-world contexts over abstract academic debates.
Q: How many words should I speak in 45 seconds? A: Aim for 110–140 words. This matches the natural speaking rate for a 4.0/4.0 raw score (130–150 WPM) without sounding rushed.
Q: Can I disagree with the prompt? A: Yes. ETS raters evaluate how well you defend a position, not which position you choose. Choose the side you can support with two concrete examples.
Q: Does pronunciation matter more than grammar? A: No. Delivery (pronunciation, pacing, intonation) and Language Use (grammar, vocabulary) each account for roughly one-third of the rubric. Weakness in either limits your score to 2.5/4.0 max.
Q: Are personal anecdotes acceptable in Task 1? A: Absolutely. ETS explicitly expects personal or academic examples. Just ensure they directly support your stated reason.
Q: How soon do 2026 TOEFL Speaking scores arrive? A: ETS delivers official scores within 72 hours of test completion, with custom stereophones now standard at all test centers for audio recording.