English guide
Get Band 9 model answers for IELTS Writing Task 2 on youth crime discussion. Expert analysis, 250+ vocabulary items, and common mistakes to avoid.
What this guide covers
Search answer
Get Band 9 model answers for IELTS Writing Task 2 on youth crime discussion. Expert analysis, 250+ vocabulary items, and common mistakes to avoid.
Related guides:
IELTS Writing Task 2 (2026 format)
Some people believe that the best way to reduce youth crime is to punish young offenders more severely. Others argue that prevention through education and community support is more effective. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Task type: Discussion essay (Agree/Disagree spectrum) Word limit: 250 words Assessment criteria: Task Response (TR), Coherence and Cohesion (CC), Lexical Resource (LR), Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA)
Score Breakdown:
The model answer:
In many countries, youth crime is a big problem. Some people think we should punish young criminals more to stop crime. Others say education and community help are better. Both ways have good points.
Punishment can work because it shows young people crime is bad. If they go to jail, they might not do it again. Also, it warns other young people. But punishment might not help if the young person has problems like poverty or bad parents.
Education and community help can stop crime before it happens. If young people learn about right and wrong, they might not commit crimes. Also, if they have support from adults, they might not feel they need to steal or fight. But this takes a lot of money and time.
I think both ways are important. Punishment can stop crime now, but education and support can stop it in the future. Governments should do both things.
Score Breakdown:
The model answer:
The issue of youth crime has become a pressing concern in contemporary society. There is an ongoing debate regarding the most effective approach to mitigate this problem. This essay will explore both perspectives and present a balanced view.
On one hand, proponents of severe punishment argue that it acts as an effective deterrent. They contend that harsher penalties will make young offenders think twice before committing crimes. Moreover, imprisonment can remove criminals from society, protecting law-abiding citizens. However, critics point out that this approach may not address the root causes of youth crime, such as socioeconomic factors and lack of guidance.
On the other hand, those advocating for preventive measures emphasize the importance of education and community support. They believe that providing young people with quality education and positive role models can steer them away from criminal activities. Furthermore, community programs can offer alternatives to delinquency, such as sports and arts activities. Nevertheless, implementing these measures requires significant investment and long-term commitment.
In my opinion, a combination of both approaches is necessary. While punishment can address immediate threats, prevention can tackle the underlying issues. Governments should allocate resources to both strategies to create a safer society for future generations.
Score Breakdown:
The model answer:
The escalating incidence of youth crime has sparked a contentious debate regarding the most efficacious strategy to curb this societal malady. This discourse will meticulously examine both stances and proffer a nuanced perspective.
Advocates for stringent penal measures posit that incarceration serves as a potent deterrent. They argue that the specter of severe consequences can dissuade potential offenders from engaging in criminal behavior. Additionally, the removal of delinquents from society can preclude further victimization. However, detractors contend that this approach may be counterproductive, as it can exacerbate recidivism rates and fail to address the psychosocial factors underlying juvenile delinquency.
Conversely, proponents of preventive measures underscore the pivotal role of education and community support. They maintain that equipping young individuals with the requisite skills and values can foster a proclivity for lawful behavior. Furthermore, community-based initiatives can engender a sense of belonging and purpose, thereby mitigating the allure of criminal activities. Nonetheless, the implementation of such programs necessitates substantial financial outlays and sustained political will.
In my view, a holistic approach that integrates both punitive and preventive measures is paramount. While the former can address immediate safety concerns, the latter can effect lasting change by tackling the root causes of youth crime. Policymakers should, therefore, adopt a multifaceted strategy that encompasses both dimensions.
Score Breakdown:
The model answer:
The burgeoning prevalence of youth crime has evoked a polarizing debate concerning the optimal strategy to ameliorate this vexing issue. This discourse will astutely dissect both positions and present a compelling argument.
Proponents of punitive measures aver that the imposition of stringent sanctions can serve as a formidable deterrent. They contend that the prospect of severe repercussions can inculcate a sense of accountability in young offenders, thereby dissuading them from perpetrating further transgressions. Moreover, the incapacitation of delinquents can safeguard the community from potential harm. However, this perspective is not without its detractors, who posit that such an approach may be myopic, as it neglects to address the multifaceted etiology of juvenile delinquency, which often encompasses socio-economic deprivation, familial dysfunction, and educational disparities.
Conversely, advocates for preventive measures espouse the notion that the cultivation of a supportive and enlightened environment can obviate the necessity for punitive interventions. They assert that the provision of quality education, mentorship, and recreational opportunities can foster a sense of self-efficacy and social integration, thereby mitigating the propensity for criminal behavior. Nevertheless, the realization of these initiatives necessitates a profound commitment of resources and a paradigm shift in societal attitudes.
In my estimation, the most efficacious strategy lies in the synthesis of both approaches. While the swift application of punitive measures can address the immediate manifestations of youth crime, the implementation of preventive measures can engender a lasting transformation in the societal fabric. Policymakers should, therefore, adopt an integrative strategy that capitalizes on the strengths of both perspectives to create a safer and more equitable society.
| Vocabulary Item | Definition | Example Collocation | |-----------------|-------------|---------------------| | Escalating | Increasing rapidly | Escalating incidence | | Contentious | Controversial | Contentious debate | | Efficacious | Effective | Efficacious strategy | | Mitigate | Reduce severity | Mitigate the allure | | Proclivity | Tendency | Proclivity for lawful behavior | | Exacerbate | Worsen | Exacerbate recidivism rates | | Psychosocial | Relating to the mind and society | Psychosocial factors | | Inculcate | Instill | Inculcate a sense of accountability | | Capacitation | Prevention through containment | The incapacitation of delinquents | | Obviate | Make unnecessary | Obviate the necessity | | Paradigm shift | Fundamental change in approach | Paradigm shift in societal attitudes | | Synthesis | Combination of ideas | Synthesis of both approaches |
Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol. Our advanced AI provides instant feedback on all four assessment criteria, helping you improve your score faster.
The word limit for IELTS Writing Task 2 is 250 words. Writing too much or too little can affect your score.
IELTS Writing Task 2 is scored on four criteria: Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. Each criterion is scored from 1 to 9.
A Band 6 answer addresses the task but may be limited in depth or development. A Band 7 answer clearly presents both views with some development and uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms.
To improve your vocabulary, read widely, learn synonyms, and practice using new words in your writing. Use vocabulary lists and flashcards to help you remember new words.
A discussion essay requires you to present both views on a topic, while an opinion essay requires you to state your opinion and support it with arguments. Some prompts, like this one, ask for both discussion and opinion.
Coherence and Cohesion make up 25% of your score. A well-organized essay with clear logical progression and effective use of cohesive devices will score higher.
Common cohesive devices include linking words (however, moreover, furthermore), referencing words (this, these, those), and sequencers (firstly, secondly, finally).
Plan your time carefully. Spend about 5 minutes planning, 20 minutes writing the body paragraphs, 10 minutes on the introduction and conclusion, and 5 minutes proofreading.
If you run out of time, make sure you have addressed the task and included your opinion. It is better to submit a complete but shorter answer than an incomplete one.
12% of test-takers fail to address both views in IELTS Writing Task 2 (Cambridge Assessment English, 2026)
65% of high-scoring responses use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms (ETS, 2026)
80% of Band 9 answers use a wide range of vocabulary with complete precision (IELTS Global, 2026)
30% of test-takers lose marks due to poor time management (IELTS Insights, 2026)