English guide
See side-by-side Band 6, 7, 8, and 9 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answers for wildlife conservation two-part questions. Includes scoring breakdowns and expert analysis.
What this guide covers
Search answer
See side-by-side Band 6, 7, 8, and 9 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answers for wildlife conservation two-part questions. Includes scoring breakdowns and expert analysis.
Related guides:
The following two tasks are related. In Task 1, you should spend about 20 minutes on each task. In Task 2, you should spend about 40 minutes.
Task 1: Wild animals have become endangered and some people suggest that they should be kept in special reserves. Do you agree or disagree?
Task 2: Some people believe that the best way to protect wildlife is to leave it alone. Others argue that we should be actively involved in conservation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Task 1:
In my opinion, wild animals should be kept in special reserves. This is because there are many dangers in the wild, such as hunters and lack of food. Reserves can protect them from these threats.
Task 2:
Some people think that wildlife should be left alone. They believe that nature should take its course and that humans should not interfere. Others say that we should be actively involved in conservation. I think both views have some truth.
Leaving wildlife alone can be good because it allows natural processes to happen. However, humans have caused many problems for wildlife, so we need to help. For example, we can create protected areas and laws to stop hunting. In my opinion, the best approach is to do both: leave wildlife alone when possible, but also help when necessary.
Scoring Breakdown:
Task 1:
I strongly agree that wild animals should be kept in special reserves. The main reason is that many species are threatened by habitat loss and poaching. Reserves provide a safe environment where these animals can live and breed without these dangers.
Task 2:
The debate over whether to leave wildlife alone or actively involve ourselves in conservation is complex. Those who advocate for a hands-off approach argue that interfering with nature can have unintended consequences. For instance, introducing non-native species to help an ecosystem might disrupt the balance.
On the other hand, many wildlife species are now endangered due to human activities. Active conservation efforts, such as breeding programs and habitat restoration, have successfully saved several species from extinction. In my view, a balanced approach is necessary. We should prioritize leaving wildlife alone but intervene when human activities have caused significant harm.
Scoring Breakdown:
Task 1:
I firmly believe that wild animals should be kept in special reserves to ensure their survival. The rapid destruction of natural habitats and the illegal wildlife trade have pushed many species to the brink of extinction. Reserves offer a controlled environment where endangered species can thrive without the constant threat of human encroachment.
Task 2:
The question of whether to leave wildlife alone or actively participate in conservation efforts is a contentious one. Proponents of non-interference argue that natural selection should dictate the fate of species. They contend that human intervention often leads to unintended ecological imbalances, as seen in cases where invasive species have been introduced to