English guide
Get a Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer on wildlife conservation with scoring breakdown, vocabulary, and common mistakes to avoid.
What this guide covers
Search answer
Get a Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer on wildlife conservation with scoring breakdown, vocabulary, and common mistakes to avoid.
Related guides:
> Some people believe that wildlife conservation is the responsibility of governments, while others argue that individuals should take more responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Task Response: Presents a position but with limited development. The arguments are simplistic and lack depth. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized but with some repetition and awkward transitions. Lexical Resource: Uses some appropriate vocabulary but with frequent errors and limited range. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Makes frequent grammatical errors that impede understanding.
Some people think that governments should be responsible for wildlife conservation. They believe that governments have more resources and power to implement effective policies. For example, governments can create protected areas and enforce laws against poaching. However, others argue that individuals should take more responsibility. They say that people can make a difference by changing their lifestyles and supporting conservation organizations.
In my opinion, both governments and individuals have important roles to play. Governments should create policies and laws to protect wildlife, but individuals should also do their part by being more environmentally conscious. For instance, people can reduce their use of plastic and support organizations that work to protect endangered species. By working together, we can make a significant impact on wildlife conservation.
Task Response: Presents a clear position with some development. The arguments are relevant and supported with some examples. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized with clear transitions. The response is easy to follow. Lexical Resource: Uses a mix of appropriate vocabulary with some less common lexical items. Some errors are present but do not impede understanding. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with some errors that may impede understanding.
The responsibility of wildlife conservation is a contentious issue with valid arguments on both sides. On one hand, governments have the resources and authority to implement large-scale conservation efforts. They can establish national parks, enforce anti-poaching laws, and fund research to protect endangered species. For example, the government of Costa Rica has successfully implemented policies that have led to a significant increase in its wildlife population.
On the other hand, individuals also play a crucial role in wildlife conservation. Everyday choices, such as reducing plastic use, supporting sustainable products, and volunteering for conservation organizations, can collectively make a substantial impact. For instance, community-led initiatives in Kenya have been instrumental in protecting elephants from poachers.
In my view, both governments and individuals must collaborate to achieve effective wildlife conservation. Governments should create and enforce policies, while individuals should adopt eco-friendly practices and support conservation efforts. Only through collective action can we ensure the survival of our planet's diverse wildlife.
Task Response: Presents a clear position with thorough development. The arguments are well-supported with relevant and extended examples. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized with clear transitions. The response is easy to follow and engaging. Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of appropriate vocabulary with some less common lexical items used precisely. Errors are rare and do not impede understanding. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with frequent error-free sentences.
The debate surrounding the responsibility of wildlife conservation is multifaceted, with compelling arguments on both sides. Proponents of government responsibility argue that only governments possess the resources and authority to implement large-scale conservation efforts. They can establish protected areas, enforce stringent anti-poaching laws, and fund extensive research to protect endangered species. For example, the government of Australia has successfully implemented policies that have led to the recovery of several endangered species, such as the southern hairy-nosed wombat.
Conversely, advocates for individual responsibility contend that collective action can significantly impact wildlife conservation. Everyday choices, such as reducing plastic consumption, supporting sustainable products, and volunteering for conservation organizations, can collectively make a substantial difference. For instance, community-led initiatives in India have been instrumental in protecting tigers from poachers.
In my view, both governments and individuals must collaborate to achieve effective wildlife conservation. Governments should create and enforce policies, while individuals should adopt eco-friendly practices and support conservation efforts. Only through collective action can we ensure the survival of our planet's diverse wildlife. Additionally, education plays a pivotal role in raising awareness and fostering a culture of conservation. By working together, we can create a sustainable future for all species.
Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to help you improve.