English guide
Get Band 9 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answers for walkable cities discussion topic. Learn from Band 6-9 model responses with scoring breakdowns.
What this guide covers
Search answer
Get Band 9 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answers for walkable cities discussion topic. Learn from Band 6-9 model responses with scoring breakdowns.
Related guides:
Discussion Essay: Some people believe that cities should be designed to be walkable, while others argue that this is impractical. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Scoring Breakdown:
Answer:
Many people think that cities should be made for walking. Others say this is not possible. I think both sides have good points.
On one hand, walkable cities are good for health. People walk more and get exercise. Also, it is better for the environment because there are fewer cars. In some cities like Barcelona, they have made special paths for walking and it works well. However, some cities are too big and spread out. In places like Los Angeles, it is very hard to walk everywhere because the distances are too long.
On the other hand, making cities walkable can be difficult. It costs a lot of money to change roads and buildings. Also, some people need to drive because they have disabilities or other reasons. In my opinion, cities should try to be more walkable, but they should also consider the needs of all people.
Scoring Breakdown:
Answer:
The idea of designing cities to be walkable has gained popularity, but there are differing opinions on its feasibility. This essay will discuss both views before presenting my opinion.
Proponents of walkable cities argue that they promote healthier lifestyles and reduce pollution. For instance, cities like Copenhagen have implemented extensive cycling and pedestrian infrastructure, leading to significant health benefits and reduced carbon emissions. Moreover, walkable cities can enhance community interactions and social cohesion. However, critics point out that implementing such designs can be costly and may not be suitable for all urban environments. In densely populated cities, space is limited, and retrofitting infrastructure can be expensive and disruptive.
In conclusion, while the benefits of walkable cities are evident, practical challenges exist. Cities should strive to incorporate walkable elements where feasible, but they must also consider the unique needs and constraints of their populations.
Scoring Breakdown:
Answer:
The concept of walkable cities has sparked debate regarding its practicality and benefits. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting a balanced view.
Advocates for walkable cities highlight the numerous advantages they offer. Primarily, walkable urban designs promote physical health by encouraging regular exercise and reducing reliance on motor vehicles. For example, cities like Amsterdam have successfully integrated cycling paths and pedestrian zones, resulting in lower obesity rates and improved air quality. Additionally, walkable cities foster a sense of community by facilitating social interactions and reducing urban isolation. However, opponents argue that the implementation of such designs can be challenging. In sprawling cities with extensive car-dependent infrastructure, retrofitting for walkability can be costly and time-consuming. Furthermore, not all residents may support such changes, particularly those who rely on cars for mobility.
In conclusion, while the benefits of walkable cities are substantial, practical challenges must be addressed. Cities should aim to incorporate walkable elements gradually, considering the needs and preferences of their diverse populations.
Scoring Breakdown:
Answer:
The notion of designing cities to prioritize walkability has garnered significant attention, with proponents and critics offering compelling arguments. This essay will delve into both perspectives before presenting a nuanced stance.
Proponents of walkable cities contend that such designs yield numerous benefits. Primarily, walkable urban environments promote public health by encouraging physical activity and reducing reliance on motor vehicles. For instance, cities like Portland, Oregon, have implemented extensive pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, resulting in improved health outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. Moreover, walkable cities enhance social cohesion by fostering community interactions and reducing urban isolation. Additionally, they contribute to environmental sustainability by lowering carbon emissions and mitigating the urban heat island effect. However, critics argue that the implementation of walkable designs can be fraught with challenges. In sprawling, car-dependent cities, retrofitting infrastructure for walkability can be prohibitively expensive and disruptive. Furthermore, not all residents may embrace such changes, particularly those with mobility impairments or those who rely on cars for their livelihoods.
In conclusion, while the advantages of walkable cities are manifold, practical challenges must be addressed through thoughtful planning and stakeholder engagement. Cities should strive to incorporate walkable elements where feasible, ensuring that such initiatives are inclusive and responsive to the diverse needs of their populations.
Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your score.