English guide
Get a Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer on walkable cities with expert scoring breakdown, vocabulary, and common mistakes to avoid.
What this guide covers
Search answer
Get a Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer on walkable cities with expert scoring breakdown, vocabulary, and common mistakes to avoid.
Related guides:
Some people believe that cities should be designed to be walkable, while others argue that cities should be designed for cars. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Task Response: Presents a position but with limited development. Some ideas are relevant but not fully extended. Cohesion and Cohesion: Logical but with some sequencing issues. Some connectors are used appropriately. Lexical Resource: Limited range of vocabulary. Some errors in word choice and collocations. Grammar: Frequent errors in sentence formation and tense usage.
Some people think cities should be walkable, while others believe cities should be designed for cars. I agree with the first view. Walkable cities are better for health and the environment. Cars cause pollution and traffic jams. Walking is good exercise and reduces pollution. However, cars are necessary for long distances. In conclusion, walkable cities are better, but cars are needed for some trips.
Task Response: Presents a clear position with some development. Ideas are relevant and extended with some supporting details. Cohesion and Cohesion: Logical sequence with clear connectors. Some effective use of cohesive devices. Lexical Resource: Adequate range of vocabulary. Some less common lexis with occasional errors. Grammar: Occasional errors but generally accurate sentence formation.
In recent years, the debate over whether cities should prioritize walkability or car accessibility has gained momentum. I firmly believe that walkable cities offer more benefits. Firstly, walkable cities promote healthier lifestyles. Walking reduces the risk of obesity and heart disease, which are prevalent in car-dependent societies. Additionally, walkable cities are more environmentally friendly. Cars emit harmful gases that contribute to air pollution and climate change. On the other hand, cars provide convenience for long-distance travel and carrying heavy items. However, the advantages of walkable cities outweigh these conveniences. In conclusion, cities should be designed to be walkable to improve public health and protect the environment.
Task Response: Presents a clear position with thorough development. Ideas are well-supported with relevant examples and details. Cohesion and Cohesion: Logical sequence with a range of cohesive devices. Effective use of paragraphs and connectors. Lexical Resource: Wide range of vocabulary with some less common lexis used appropriately. Grammar: Generally accurate with occasional minor errors.
The question of whether cities should be designed for walkability or car accessibility is a contentious one. I am convinced that walkable cities are the way forward. There are several compelling reasons for this. Firstly, walkable cities enhance the quality of life for residents. Walking is a form of exercise that can help prevent chronic diseases. According to the World Health Organization, physical inactivity is a leading risk factor for global mortality. Secondly, walkable cities reduce traffic congestion and air pollution. Cars are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, which contribute to climate change. Moreover, walkable cities foster a sense of community. People are more likely to interact with their neighbors when they walk or cycle. While cars offer convenience, the long-term benefits of walkable cities are undeniable. In conclusion, cities should prioritize walkability to create healthier, more sustainable, and more connected communities.
Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your score.
A Band 6.0 answer presents a position but with limited development, while a Band 7.0 answer presents a clear position with some development. The Band 7.0 answer also uses a wider range of vocabulary and has fewer grammar errors.
To improve your Lexical Resource score, use a wider range of vocabulary, including some less common lexis. Avoid repetition and ensure that your word choices are appropriate and accurate.
Cohesion and Cohesion are crucial in IELTS Writing Task 2 as they help the examiner understand your ideas and how they are connected. Effective use of cohesive devices can improve your score in this criterion.
You can practice for IELTS Writing Task 2 by writing essays on different topics, using a timer to simulate exam conditions. Get your essays scored by AI on English AIdol to receive detailed feedback and improve your score.
Task Response is the first criterion in IELTS Writing Task 2 and accounts for 25% of your total score. It assesses how well you address the task, present a clear position, and support your arguments with relevant examples and details.
To improve your Grammar score, practice using a variety of sentence structures and tenses accurately. Avoid frequent grammar errors and ensure that your sentences are clear and easy to understand.
A Band 7.0 answer presents a clear position with some development, while a Band 8.0 answer presents a clear position with thorough development. The Band 8.0 answer also uses a wider range of vocabulary and has fewer grammar errors.
To manage your time effectively in IELTS Writing Task 2, plan your essay before you start writing. Spend about 5 minutes planning, 20 minutes writing, and 5 minutes reviewing your essay.
Using examples in IELTS Writing Task 2 helps to support your arguments and make your ideas more convincing. Examples can also help the examiner understand your points better and improve your Task Response score.
Source: Cambridge Assessment English
Source: Cambridge Assessment English
Source: Cambridge Assessment English
[]