AI-powered learning English

English guide

IELTS Writing Task 2 Vaccination Topic:
Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

See Band 6, 7, 8, and 9 model answers for an IELTS vaccination essay. Includes detailed scoring breakdowns, advanced vocabulary lists, and the top 5 mistakes to avoid for a higher score.

IELTS Writing Task 2 Vaccination Topic: Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers | English AIdol Blog

What this guide covers

Search answer

What this page helps you decide

See Band 6, 7, 8, and 9 model answers for an IELTS vaccination essay. Includes detailed scoring breakdowns, advanced vocabulary lists, and the top 5 mistakes to avoid for a higher score.

Focus Quick answer
Includes 2026 update
Best for Practical checklist
Next step Related practice
  1. Scan the direct answer first.
  2. Check examples or score rules.
  3. Open the related practice page.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Vaccination (Positive Negative) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

Prompt: Some people argue that vaccination programmes are essential for public health and should be mandatory. Others believe that individuals should have the right to choose whether or not to vaccinate themselves or their children. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Band 6.0 Model Answer

Vaccination is a very important topic in the world today. Many people think that vaccines must be mandatory for everyone because they protect us from dangerous diseases. For example, diseases like polio and smallpox are almost gone because of vaccines. This is good for public health because if everyone is vaccinated, sickness cannot spread so easily. This is called herd immunity.

However, other people believe that it is their right to choose. They worry about side effects from vaccines. Sometimes, vaccines can cause fever or pain. A very few people have bad reactions. Also, some people do not trust the government or pharmaceutical companies. They think that these organizations maybe care more about money than health.

In my opinion, vaccination is mostly good. Governments should make rules for vaccines because it protects everyone. But they should also give correct information to people so they can understand why it is important. This way, people might choose to vaccinate without being forced.

Scoring Breakdown (TR/CC/LR/GRA):

  • Task Response (TR) 6.0: Addresses both sides but the development is somewhat generic. The opinion is clear but could be more fully developed.
  • Coherence & Cohesion (CC) 6.0: Information is arranged coherently and paragraphing is used, but linking between ideas is sometimes mechanical (e.g., overuse of 'because').
  • Lexical Resource (LR) 6.0: Uses adequate vocabulary for the task but lacks precision (e.g., 'very important,' 'dangerous diseases'). Some spelling errors ('goverment').
  • Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA) 6.0: Uses a mix of simple and complex forms, but with frequent grammatical errors ('organizations maybe care') that do not impede communication.

---

Band 7.0 Model Answer

The debate surrounding mandatory vaccination is a complex issue that pits public welfare against individual liberty. Proponents of compulsory immunisation contend that it is a cornerstone of modern public health policy. Widespread vaccination creates herd immunity, effectively shielding vulnerable populations who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons from life-threatening illnesses like measles or whooping cough. Historical successes, such as the global eradication of smallpox, are frequently cited as evidence of its efficacy.

Conversely, opponents argue that such mandates infringe upon personal freedoms and bodily autonomy. Concerns often centre around potential adverse side effects, albeit rare, and a deep-seated distrust of pharmaceutical corporations and government agendas. The desire for personal choice and the right to make informed medical decisions for oneself and one's family is a powerful motivator for this group.

In my view, while individual rights are paramount, they must be balanced against the collective good. I believe that vaccination should be strongly encouraged through comprehensive public education campaigns that transparently address safety concerns, rather than enforced by law. This approach respects autonomy while prioritising community health outcomes.

Scoring Breakdown (TR/CC/LR/GRA):

  • Task Response (TR) 7.0: Presents a clear position throughout the response. Both sides are developed and relevant, but the conclusion could be more decisive.
  • Coherence & Cohesion (CC) 7.0: Logically organises information and ideas; there is clear progression throughout. Uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately (e.g., 'conversely,' 'albeit').
  • Lexical Resource (LR) 7.0: Uses sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision. Uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation (e.g., 'cornerstone,' 'infringe upon,' 'deep-seated distrust').
  • Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA) 7.0: Uses a variety of complex structures. Frequently produces error-free sentences. Some grammatical errors persist but are non-systemic.

---

Band 8.0 Model Answer

The contention over compulsory vaccination programmes hinges on the fundamental tension between societal responsibility and individual rights. Advocates for mandates assert that immunisation is not merely a personal choice but a civic duty. The scientific consensus is unequivocal: vaccines are among the most effective medical interventions in history, drastically reducing morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases. Herd immunity, achieved through high vaccination rates, protects the most susceptible members of society, including infants and the immunocompromised, for whom these diseases can be fatal.

On the other hand, detractors champion the principle of informed consent and the right to refuse medical treatment. This stance is often fueled by misinformation regarding vaccine safety and a legitimate scepticism of vested interests within the healthcare industry. High-profile cases of alleged adverse reactions, though statistically negligible, gain traction in the media and erode public trust.

I am firmly of the opinion that the overwhelming benefits to public health justify a policy of mandatory vaccination for non-medical exemptions. However, this must be coupled with a robust, transparent public health strategy that educates citizens, combats misinformation, and rebuilds trust. The goal should be willing participation, but the protection of the community cannot be left to chance.

Scoring Breakdown (TR/CC/LR/GRA):

  • Task Response (TR) 8.0: Sufficiently addresses all parts of the task. Presents a well-developed response with relevant, extended, and supported ideas.
  • Coherence & Cohesion (CC) 8.0: Sequences information and ideas logically. Manages all aspects of cohesion well. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately.
  • Lexical Resource (LR) 8.0: Uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly to convey precise meanings. Skillfully uses uncommon lexical items but with occasional inaccacies in word choice and collocation.
  • Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA) 8.0: Uses a wide range of structures. The majority of sentences are error-free. Makes only very occasional errors.

---

Band 9.0 Model Answer

The efficacy of vaccination is one of the most unequivocal successes of modern medicine, yet its implementation sparks a fervent debate that intersects public health policy, ethics, and personal freedom. Those in favour of compulsory vaccination argue from a utilitarian perspective: the minimal risk to an individual is vastly outweighed by the monumental benefit to the populace. Programmes eradicating smallpox and curbing polio demonstrate an unparalleled capacity to save millions of lives and alleviate immense societal burdens. The concept of herd immunity is not just a theoretical ideal but a practical necessity for protecting those who are most vulnerable.

Conversely, libertarian arguments against mandates are rooted in the inviolable principle of bodily autonomy and the right to informed consent. Critics posit that coercive policies, however well-intentioned, set a dangerous precedent for state overreach into personal healthcare decisions. This scepticism is often exacerbated by historical instances of medical malpractice and the pervasive spread of misinformation through digital media, which fosters distrust in scientific and governmental institutions.

Ultimately, I contend that a society's obligation to safeguard collective health must take precedence. While absolute autonomy is an ideal, it becomes untenable when individual choices precipitate public health crises. Therefore, mandatory vaccination, particularly for preventable diseases with high transmission rates, is justified. Nevertheless, this must be implemented not as a blunt instrument of control but as part of a multifaceted approach that includes transparent communication, accessible healthcare, and relentless efforts to dismantle misinformation, thereby fostering trust and ensuring compliance is both widespread and informed.

Scoring Breakdown (TR/CC/LR/GRA):

  • Task Response (TR) 9.0: Fully addresses all parts of the task with fully extended and well-supported ideas.
  • Coherence & Cohesion (CC) 9.0: Uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention. Skilfully manages paragraphing.
  • Lexical Resource (LR) 9.0: Uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’.
  • Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA) 9.0: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’.

Key Vocabulary for Vaccination Topics

| Vocabulary | Definition & Example Collocations | | :--- | :--- | | Herd immunity | (n.) Resistance to the spread of a contagious disease within a population. Achieve herd immunity, crucial for herd immunity. | | Mandatory | (adj.) Required by law or rules; compulsory. Mandatory vaccination, mandatory policy. | | Efficacy | (n.) The ability to produce a desired or intended result. Vaccine efficacy, proven efficacy. | | Morbidity | (n.) The condition of being diseased. Reduce morbidity, rates of morbidity. | | Autonomy | (n.) The right or condition of self-government. Bodily autonomy, individual autonomy. | | Informed consent | (n.) Permission granted in full knowledge of the possible consequences. Give informed consent, principle of informed consent. | | Adverse effects | (n.) Harmful or undesired side effects. Experience adverse effects, risk of adverse effects. | | Scepticism | (n.) A doubting or questioning attitude. Public scepticism, healthy scepticism. | | Utilitarian | (adj.) Designed to be useful or practical rather than attractive. Utilitarian approach, utilitarian perspective. | | Unequivocal | (adj.) Leaving no doubt; unambiguous. Unequivocal evidence, unequivocal success. | | Immunocompromised | (adj.) Having an impaired immune system. Protect the immunocompromised, immunocompromised patients. | | Precedent | (n.) An earlier event or action regarded as an example. Set a dangerous precedent, legal precedent. | | Pervasive | (adj.) Spreading widely throughout an area or group. Pervasive misinformation, pervasive influence. | | Contentious | (adj.) Causing or likely to cause disagreement. Contentious issue, highly contentious. | | Vested interests | (n.) A personal stake in an undertaking or state of affairs. Pharmaceutical vested interests, powerful vested interests. |

5 Common Mistakes on Vaccination Essays

  1. Ignoring One Side of the Argument: The prompt asks you to "discuss both views." A common error is to spend 80% of the essay on one side, only briefly mentioning the other. Allocate roughly equal space to each perspective before giving your opinion.
  2. Using Emotional or Unscientific Language: Avoid phrases like "poisonous vaccines" or "evil corporations." IELTS values a formal, objective tone. Stick to evidence-based arguments like "statistically negligible risks" or "scientific consensus."
  3. Poor Paragraph Structure: Each body paragraph should focus on one main idea. A typical structure is: Paragraph 1 (Arguments FOR), Paragraph 2 (Arguments AGAINST), Paragraph 3 (Your Opinion). Many students mix all these ideas together chaotically.
  4. Repeating the Same Vocabulary: Using "good," "important," and "bad" repeatedly will limit your LR score. Use the vocabulary list above to vary your language (e.g., "paramount importance," "detrimental effects," "significant benefits").
  5. Having a Weak or Unclear Opinion: Your opinion must be clear throughout the essay, especially in the conclusion. Don't just say "both sides are good." Take a stance, even if it's a balanced one (e.g., "While I acknowledge the concerns, I firmly believe...").

Get your own response scored by AI on English AIdol