IELTS Writing Task 2: Stem Cell Research (Two Part Question) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

• IELTS Writing Task 2 Deforestation Two Part Question Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Recycling (Discussion) — Band 6/7/8/9…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Climate Change Discussion Sample Band…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Plastic Pollution (Advantages…
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Renewable Energy Two Part Question…

The Prompt

Paraphrased from Cambridge Assessment English:

Some people argue that stem cell research offers significant medical benefits, while others believe it raises serious ethical concerns. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 5.0 - Presents a position but with limited development
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 6.0 - Ideas are logically organized but with some repetition
• Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 - Uses some appropriate vocabulary but with errors and limited range
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 - Makes frequent grammatical mistakes but attempts complex structures

Answer:

Stem cell research is a big topic today. Some people think it is good for medicine. Others say it is not good because it is not ethical. I think both sides have good points.

On one hand, stem cell research can help sick people. Scientists can use stem cells to make new body parts. This can help people who are very sick. For example, stem cells can help people who have heart problems. Also, stem cells can help people who have cancer. This is good because it can save lives.

On the other hand, some people think stem cell research is not good. They say it is not ethical. This is because stem cells come from embryos. Some people think embryos are like babies. They say it is not right to use them for research. Also, some people think stem cell research is dangerous. They say it can make bad things happen in the future.

In my opinion, stem cell research is good. I think the good things it can do are more important than the bad things. But I think we should be careful. We should make sure we do not do bad things with stem cells.

Band 7.0 Answer

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 7.0 - Presents a clear position with some development
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 7.0 - Ideas are logically organized with clear progression
• Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 - Uses a mix of appropriate vocabulary with some errors
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 - Makes some grammatical mistakes but uses a mix of simple and complex structures

Answer:

The debate surrounding stem cell research is a contentious one, with proponents highlighting its medical benefits and opponents expressing ethical concerns. This essay will discuss both views before presenting a personal stance.

Firstly, stem cell research offers significant medical advantages. Stem cells have the potential to regenerate damaged tissues and organs, which could revolutionize treatments for diseases such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, and spinal cord injuries. For instance, clinical trials have shown promising results in using stem cells to treat heart disease. Furthermore, stem cell research could lead to the development of personalized medicine, where treatments are tailored to individual patients' genetic makeup. This could greatly improve the efficacy of treatments and reduce side effects.

However, there are valid ethical concerns surrounding stem cell research. One of the main issues is the source of stem cells, which are often derived from embryos. Many people believe that embryos have the same moral status as human beings and that destroying them for research is unethical. Additionally, there are concerns about the potential misuse of stem cell technology, such as human cloning or the creation of designer babies. These ethical dilemmas have led to strict regulations and bans on certain types of stem cell research in many countries.

In my opinion, the medical benefits of stem cell research outweigh the ethical concerns. However, it is crucial that research is conducted responsibly and ethically, with strict regulations in place to prevent misuse. I believe that with proper oversight, stem cell research can lead to significant advancements in medicine and improve the quality of life for many people.

Band 8.0 Answer

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 8.0 - Presents a clear position with thorough development
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 8.0 - Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices
• Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 - Uses a wide range of appropriate vocabulary with few errors
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex structures with few grammatical mistakes

Answer:

Stem cell research has emerged as a pivotal area of scientific inquiry, sparking intense debate due to its profound implications for both medical advancement and ethical considerations. This essay will explore the arguments for and against stem cell research before presenting a personal perspective.

Proponents of stem cell research argue that it holds immense potential for medical breakthroughs. Stem cells, which are undifferentiated cells capable of developing into various cell types, can be used to regenerate damaged tissues and organs. This could lead to innovative treatments for a wide range of diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and spinal cord injuries. For example, stem cell therapy has shown promising results in clinical trials for treating heart disease, with patients exhibiting improved heart function and reduced symptoms. Moreover, stem cell research could pave the way for personalized medicine, where treatments are tailored to an individual's genetic makeup, enhancing their effectiveness and minimizing adverse effects.

However, opponents of stem cell research raise significant ethical concerns. One of the primary issues is the source of stem cells, which are often derived from embryos. Many people view embryos as having the same moral status as human beings, and thus, destroying them for research purposes is considered unethical. Additionally, there are concerns about the potential misuse of stem cell technology, such as human cloning or the creation of genetically modified babies. These ethical dilemmas have led to strict regulations and bans on certain types of stem cell research in many countries, highlighting the need for careful consideration of the moral implications of this field.

In my view, the medical benefits of stem cell research outweigh the ethical concerns. The potential to alleviate suffering and improve the quality of life for countless individuals is immense. However, it is crucial that research is conducted responsibly and ethically, with robust regulations in place to prevent misuse. I believe that with proper oversight, stem cell research can lead to significant advancements in medicine and contribute to a healthier society.

Band 9.0 Answer

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 9.0 - Presents a clear position with thorough, insightful development
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 9.0 - Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and sophisticated use of cohesive devices
• Lexical Resource (LR): 9.0 - Uses a wide range of appropriate, sophisticated vocabulary with rare errors
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 9.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex structures with rare grammatical mistakes

Answer:

The burgeoning field of stem cell research has ignited a fervent debate, with proponents extolling its therapeutic potential and detractors voicing ethical apprehensions. This discourse will elucidate both perspectives before proffering a nuanced stance.

Advocates of stem cell research posit that it harbors transformative potential for medical science. Stem cells, by virtue of their pluripotency, can differentiate into any cell type, facilitating the regeneration of damaged tissues and organs. This capability could herald a paradigm shift in the treatment of intractable conditions, such as neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular ailments, and spinal cord injuries. For instance, clinical trials have demonstrated that stem cell therapy can ameliorate heart function in patients with myocardial infarction. Furthermore, stem cell research could catalyze the advent of precision medicine, wherein treatments are customized to an individual's genetic profile, enhancing their efficacy and mitigating adverse effects. The economic implications are also substantial, with the global stem cell market projected to reach $249.7 billion by 2025, according to a report by Grand View Research.

Conversely, critics of stem cell research articulate compelling ethical concerns. The primary contentious issue pertains to the origin of stem cells, which are frequently derived from embryos. Many individuals ascribe moral equivalence to embryos and human beings, rendering their destruction for research purposes ethically reprehensible. Additionally, there are apprehensions regarding the potential misuse of stem cell technology, such as human cloning or the creation of genetically modified offspring. These ethical quandaries have engendered stringent regulations and moratoriums on certain types of stem cell research in numerous countries, underscoring the necessity for a judicious approach to this contentious field.

In my considered opinion, the medical benefits of stem cell research are paramount and warrant prioritization. The potential to alleviate human suffering and enhance the quality of life for myriad individuals is profound. However, it is incumbent upon us to ensure that research is conducted with the utmost ethical rigor, with robust regulatory frameworks in place to preclude misuse. I contend that, with judicious oversight, stem cell research can engender groundbreaking advancements in medicine and contribute significantly to the betterment of society.

Key Vocabulary

1. Pluripotency (noun): The ability of stem cells to differentiate into any cell type.

• Example: The pluripotency of embryonic stem cells makes them valuable for regenerative medicine.

1. Ethically reprehensible (adjective): Morally wrong or unacceptable.

• Example: Many people find the destruction of embryos for stem cell research ethically reprehensible.

1. Precision medicine (noun): An approach to medicine that tailors treatments to individual patients' genetic makeup.

• Example: Precision medicine could revolutionize the way we treat diseases like cancer.

1. Intractable (adjective): Difficult to control or resolve.

• Example: Stem cell research could provide new treatments for intractable conditions like Alzheimer's disease.

1. Myocardial infarction (noun): A heart attack, caused by a blockage in the coronary arteries.

• Example: Stem cell therapy has shown promising results in treating myocardial infarction.

1. Paradigm shift (noun): A fundamental change in approach or underlying assumptions.

• Example: Stem cell research could herald a paradigm shift in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

1. Judicious (adjective): Showing good judgment or sense.

• Example: It is crucial that stem cell research is conducted with judicious oversight.

1. Contentious (adjective): Controversial or likely to cause disagreement.

• Example: The ethical implications of stem cell research are highly contentious.

1. Pluripotency (noun): The ability of stem cells to differentiate into any cell type.

• Example: The pluripotency of embryonic stem cells makes them valuable for regenerative medicine.

1. Regenerative medicine (noun): A branch of medicine that aims to replace or regenerate human cells, tissues, or organs to restore normal function.

• Example: Stem cell research is a key area of regenerative medicine.

1. Neurodegenerative (adjective): Relating to the progressive loss of structure or function of neurons.

• Example: Stem cell research could provide new treatments for neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson's.

1. Cardiovascular (adjective): Relating to the heart and blood vessels.

• Example: Stem cell therapy has shown promising results in treating cardiovascular diseases.

1. Spinal cord injury (noun): Damage to the spinal cord that results in loss of function such as mobility or feeling.

• Example: Stem cell research could lead to new treatments for spinal cord injuries.

1. Efficacy (noun): The ability to produce a desired or intended result.

• Example: Precision medicine aims to enhance the efficacy of treatments.

1. Adverse effects (noun): Unfavorable side effects of a treatment or medication.

• Example: Personalized medicine can help mitigate the adverse effects of treatments.

1. Robust (adjective): Strong and healthy; vigorous.

• Example: Robust regulations are needed to ensure the ethical conduct of stem cell research.

1. Moratorium (noun): A temporary prohibition of an activity.

• Example: Some countries have imposed a moratorium on certain types of stem cell research.

1. Alzheimer's disease (noun): A progressive brain disorder that destroys memory and thinking skills.

• Example: Stem cell research could provide new treatments for Alzheimer's disease.

1. Parkinson's disease (noun): A progressive nervous system disorder that affects movement.

• Example: Stem cell therapy has shown promising results in treating Parkinson's disease.

1. Cancer (noun): A group of diseases involving abnormal cell growth with the potential to invade or spread to other parts of the body.

• Example: Stem cell research could lead to new treatments for cancer.

Common Mistakes

1. Lack of Clear Position: Many students fail to present a clear position in their essay, leading to a lower score in the Task Response criterion.

1. Inadequate Development of Ideas: Students often present ideas without sufficient development or examples, resulting in a lower score in the Coherence and Cohesion criterion.

1. Limited Vocabulary: Using a limited range of vocabulary can lead to a lower score in the Lexical Resource criterion. Students should aim to use a wide range of appropriate and sophisticated vocabulary.

1. Grammatical Errors: Frequent grammatical mistakes can negatively impact the Grammatical Range and Accuracy criterion. Students should proofread their essays carefully to minimize errors.

1. Poor Time Management: Many students struggle with time management during the IELTS Writing Task 2, leading to rushed or incomplete essays. It is essential to practice time management strategies to ensure that you have enough time to plan, write, and review your essay.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 responses scored by AI on English AIdol, the AI-powered test prep platform by Alfie Lim, a TESOL-certified English educator. Identify your strengths and areas for improvement with detailed feedback and personalized study recommendations.