AI-powered learning English

English guide

IELTS Writing Task 2:
Space Travel (Positive Negative) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

IELTS Writing Task 2 space travel positive negative sample answers for Bands 6, 7, 8, and 9. Get expert tips and model responses for top scores.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Space Travel (Positive Negative) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers | English AIdol Blog

What this guide covers

Search answer

What this page helps you decide

IELTS Writing Task 2 space travel positive negative sample answers for Bands 6, 7, 8, and 9. Get expert tips and model responses for top scores.

Focus Quick answer
Includes 2026 update
Best for Practical checklist
Next step Related practice
  1. Scan the direct answer first.
  2. Check examples or score rules.
  3. Open the related practice page.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Space Travel (Positive Negative) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

The Prompt

Prompt: Some people believe that space travel is a waste of money and should be stopped. Others argue that space exploration is essential for scientific progress. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6 Answer

Sample Answer:

Space travel is very expensive, and some people think we should not spend money on it. I agree with this view. First, there are many problems on Earth like poverty and pollution. We should solve these problems before going to space. Second, space travel is dangerous. Many astronauts have died in accidents. We should not risk human lives for space exploration.

However, others say space travel is important. They believe it helps science and technology. For example, satellites help us with weather forecasts and communication. But I still think we should focus on Earth's problems first.

Scoring Breakdown:

  • Task Response (TR): Addresses the task but presents a one-sided argument with limited discussion of the opposing view. (Band 5)
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are presented but with some repetition and unclear progression. (Band 6)
  • Lexical Resource (LR): Limited range of vocabulary with some errors in word choice. (Band 5)
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Simple sentence structures with frequent errors. (Band 5)

Band 7 Answer

Sample Answer:

The debate over space travel's value is contentious. Proponents argue it drives scientific advancement, while critics contend it diverts resources from pressing terrestrial issues. Both perspectives merit examination.

On one hand, space exploration has yielded significant benefits. Satellite technology enhances global communication and weather prediction, while space research has led to medical breakthroughs. For instance, NASA's research has contributed to advancements in cancer treatment. Additionally, space travel inspires technological innovation and international collaboration, such as the International Space Station.

Conversely, the financial burden of space programs is substantial. The cost of a single mission could fund numerous initiatives to address poverty, education, and environmental degradation on Earth. Moreover, the environmental impact of rocket launches, including atmospheric pollution and space debris, poses long-term risks. For example, the increasing number of satellites in orbit has led to concerns about space debris colliding with operational spacecraft.

In conclusion, while space travel offers undeniable benefits, the high costs and environmental concerns warrant a balanced approach. Prioritizing sustainable space exploration while addressing Earth's immediate needs is crucial.

Scoring Breakdown:

  • Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with a balanced discussion of both views. (Band 7)
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized with clear progression. (Band 7)
  • Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a mix of appropriate and less precise vocabulary. (Band 7)
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with some errors. (Band 7)

Band 8 Answer

Sample Answer:

The merits of space travel have long been a subject of debate, with proponents highlighting its scientific and technological benefits, while detractors argue for the allocation of resources to more immediate terrestrial concerns. A nuanced examination of both perspectives is essential.

Advocates of space exploration posit that it catalyzes scientific discovery and technological innovation. The development of satellite technology has revolutionized global communication, weather forecasting, and navigation systems. Furthermore, space research has led to medical advancements, such as the development of MRI technology, which was initially conceived for space missions. The collaborative nature of space programs, exemplified by the International Space Station, fosters international cooperation and shared scientific goals.

Conversely, the financial implications of space travel are substantial. The cost of a single mission could fund numerous initiatives to address global issues such as poverty, education, and environmental degradation. The environmental impact of rocket launches, including atmospheric pollution and the proliferation of space debris, presents long-term risks. For instance, the increasing number of satellites in orbit has raised concerns about the potential for collisions and the creation of space debris fields.

In conclusion, while space travel offers significant benefits, the high costs and environmental concerns necessitate a balanced approach. Prioritizing sustainable space exploration while addressing Earth's immediate needs is crucial. A measured investment in space programs, coupled with a commitment to resolving terrestrial challenges, is the optimal path forward.

Scoring Breakdown:

  • Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with a thorough discussion of both views and a logical conclusion. (Band 8)
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices. (Band 8)
  • Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a wide range of vocabulary with some less precise word choices. (Band 8)
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with some errors. (Band 8)

Band 9 Answer

Sample Answer:

The debate surrounding the value of space travel is multifaceted, with proponents advocating for its scientific and technological contributions, while critics highlight the diversion of resources from pressing terrestrial issues. A comprehensive analysis of both perspectives is imperative.

Proponents of space exploration argue that it drives scientific discovery and technological innovation. The development of satellite technology has revolutionized global communication, weather forecasting, and navigation systems. Space research has also led to medical advancements, such as the development of MRI technology, which was initially conceived for space missions. The collaborative nature of space programs, exemplified by the International Space Station, fosters international cooperation and shared scientific goals. Furthermore, space exploration inspires technological advancements that have practical applications on Earth, such as advancements in materials science and robotics.

Conversely, the financial implications of space travel are substantial. The cost of a single mission could fund numerous initiatives to address global issues such as poverty, education, and environmental degradation. The environmental impact of rocket launches, including atmospheric pollution and the proliferation of space debris, presents long-term risks. For instance, the increasing number of satellites in orbit has raised concerns about the potential for collisions and the creation of space debris fields. Additionally, the high costs of space programs often divert funds from essential terrestrial projects, such as healthcare and infrastructure development.

In conclusion, while space travel offers significant benefits, the high costs and environmental concerns necessitate a balanced approach. Prioritizing sustainable space exploration while addressing Earth's immediate needs is crucial. A measured investment in space programs, coupled with a commitment to resolving terrestrial challenges, is the optimal path forward. By striking a balance between space exploration and terrestrial priorities, we can maximize the benefits of both endeavors.

Scoring Breakdown:

  • Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with a thorough discussion of both views and a logical conclusion. (Band 9)
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices. (Band 9)
  • Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a wide range of vocabulary with precise word choices. (Band 9)
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with minimal errors. (Band 9)

Vocabulary Highlights

  1. Contentious (adjective): Causing or likely to cause an argument; controversial.
  • Example: The debate over space travel's value is contentious.
  1. Proponents (noun): A person who advocates for a cause or proposal.
  • Example: Proponents argue that space travel drives scientific advancement.
  1. Detractors (noun): A person who disparages someone or something.
  • Example: Detractors contend that space exploration diverts resources from pressing terrestrial issues.
  1. Merits (noun): The quality of being deserving of praise or approval.
  • Example: The merits of space travel have long been a subject of debate.
  1. Catalyzes (verb): To cause or accelerate a reaction or event.
  • Example: Space exploration catalyzes scientific discovery and technological innovation.
  1. Revolutionized (verb): To change something radically or significantly.
  • Example: The development of satellite technology has revolutionized global communication.
  1. Proliferation (noun): Rapid increase in the number or amount of something.
  • Example: The proliferation of space debris presents long-term risks.
  1. Imperative (adjective): Of vital importance; crucial.
  • Example: A comprehensive analysis of both perspectives is imperative.
  1. Nuanced (adjective): Characterized by subtle differences in meaning or expression.
  • Example: A nuanced examination of both perspectives is essential.
  1. Collaborative (adjective): Produced or achieved by two or more parties working together.
  • Example: The collaborative nature of space programs fosters international cooperation.
  1. Allocation (noun): The action or process of distributing something.
  • Example: The allocation of resources to more immediate terrestrial concerns.
  1. Sustainable (adjective): Able to be maintained at a certain rate or level without depleting natural resources.
  • Example: Prioritizing sustainable space exploration while addressing Earth's immediate needs.
  1. Optimal (adjective): Best or most favorable.
  • Example: The optimal path forward.
  1. Multifaceted (adjective): Having many different aspects or features.
  • Example: The debate surrounding the value of space travel is multifaceted.
  1. Imperative (noun): A necessary action that must be done.
  • Example: A comprehensive analysis of both perspectives is imperative.
  1. Diversion (noun): The action of turning something aside from its course.
  • Example: The diversion of resources from pressing terrestrial issues.
  1. Practical Applications (noun): The use of something in a real-world context.
  • Example: Space exploration inspires technological advancements that have practical applications on Earth.
  1. Essential (adjective): Absolutely necessary; extremely important.
  • Example: Addressing Earth's immediate needs is essential.
  1. Striking a Balance (phrase): Achieving a harmonious combination of different elements.
  • Example: By striking a balance between space exploration and terrestrial priorities.
  1. Endeavors (noun): An attempt to achieve a goal.
  • Example: Maximizing the benefits of both endeavors.

Common Mistakes

  1. One-Sided Arguments: Presenting only one side of the debate without addressing the opposing view.
  2. Lack of Examples: Failing to provide specific examples to support arguments.
  3. Repetition: Repeating the same ideas without adding new information.
  4. Poor Organization: Presenting ideas in a disjointed or unclear manner.
  5. Vocabulary Errors: Using inappropriate or incorrect vocabulary.
  6. Grammatical Errors: Making frequent grammatical mistakes that hinder understanding.
  7. Overgeneralization: Making broad statements without sufficient evidence.
  8. Lack of Conclusion: Failing to provide a clear conclusion that summarizes the main points.
  9. Irrelevant Information: Including information that is not relevant to the prompt.
  10. Inconsistent Tone: Using a tone that is inconsistent with the academic nature of the task.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Ready to improve your IELTS Writing Task 2 score? Get your own response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive personalized feedback to help you achieve your target band score.