IELTS Writing Task 2: Space Exploration (Two Part Question) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

• IELTS Writing Task 2 Deforestation Two Part Question Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Renewable Energy Agree Disagree Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Renewable Energy Two Part Question…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Climate Change Discussion Sample Band…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Plastic Pollution (Advantages…

The Prompt

Some people believe that governments should spend more money on space exploration. Others argue that there are more important issues to address on Earth. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

The government should spend money on space exploration because it helps us understand the universe better. However, some people think we should spend money on problems on Earth like poverty and pollution. I agree with both views.

Space exploration is important because it helps scientists learn about planets and stars. For example, we can learn about other planets and maybe find life there. Also, space technology can help us on Earth, like satellites for weather forecasts. But there are problems on Earth that need money too, like poor people and dirty air. Governments should spend money on both space and Earth problems.

In conclusion, space exploration is good for science and technology, but we should also solve problems on Earth. Governments should balance spending between space and Earth issues.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): Presents a position but lacks development (Band 6)
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Simple organization with some basic connectives (Band 6)
• Lexical Resource (LR): Limited range of vocabulary with some errors (Band 6)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Mostly simple sentences with frequent errors (Band 6)

Band 7.0 Answer

The debate over government spending on space exploration versus addressing Earth's issues is complex. Both perspectives have merit, and a balanced approach is necessary.

Proponents of space exploration argue that it advances scientific knowledge and technological innovation. For instance, research on Mars has led to developments in robotics and materials science. Additionally, space missions can inspire future scientists and engineers, fostering a culture of innovation. However, critics contend that resources should be directed towards pressing Earthly concerns such as climate change and poverty alleviation. For example, investing in renewable energy could mitigate the effects of global warming, while funding education and healthcare could reduce inequality.

In conclusion, while space exploration offers significant benefits, it is crucial to prioritize solving immediate problems on Earth. Governments should allocate funds to both areas, ensuring a sustainable future for all.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with some development (Band 7)
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Logical organization with clear connectives (Band 7)
• Lexical Resource (LR): Adequate range of vocabulary with some errors (Band 7)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Mix of simple and complex sentences with some errors (Band 7)

Band 8.0 Answer

The allocation of government funds towards space exploration has sparked considerable debate, with proponents highlighting its scientific and technological benefits, while critics emphasize the need to address pressing terrestrial issues.

Advocates of space exploration posit that it expands our understanding of the universe and drives technological advancements. For example, the Hubble Space Telescope has revolutionized astronomy, leading to groundbreaking discoveries about the cosmos. Furthermore, space research has practical applications on Earth, such as satellite technology that enhances communication and navigation systems. Conversely, opponents argue that resources should be channeled towards resolving global challenges like poverty, disease, and environmental degradation. For instance, investing in healthcare infrastructure could save millions of lives, while funding renewable energy projects could combat climate change.

In conclusion, while space exploration yields invaluable insights and innovations, it is imperative to address urgent issues on Earth. A balanced approach, where governments allocate funds to both sectors, is essential for sustainable progress.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with thorough development (Band 8)
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Logical organization with clear connectives and paragraphing (Band 8)
• Lexical Resource (LR): Wide range of vocabulary with some sophisticated usage (Band 8)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Mix of simple and complex sentences with few errors (Band 8)

Band 9.0 Answer

The dichotomy between investing in space exploration and addressing terrestrial issues presents a complex dilemma for governments worldwide, necessitating a nuanced approach to resource allocation.

Proponents of space exploration contend that it catalyzes scientific discovery and technological innovation. For instance, the International Space Station (ISS) has facilitated research in microgravity, leading to advancements in medicine and materials science. Moreover, space missions inspire technological breakthroughs that have terrestrial applications, such as GPS systems and satellite imagery, which are integral to modern navigation and environmental monitoring. Conversely, critics argue that the exorbitant costs of space exploration could be more effectively utilized to tackle pressing global challenges. For example, diverting funds to combat poverty and disease could significantly enhance the quality of life for millions, while investing in renewable energy could mitigate the adverse effects of climate change.

In conclusion, while space exploration offers profound benefits, it is incumbent upon governments to prioritize the resolution of immediate global issues. A balanced approach, where resources are allocated judiciously to both sectors, is essential for fostering sustainable development and ensuring a prosperous future for all.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): Presents a clear, supported position with thorough development (Band 9)
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Logical organization with clear connectives and paragraphing (Band 9)
• Lexical Resource (LR): Wide range of sophisticated vocabulary used precisely (Band 9)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Mix of simple and complex sentences with rare errors (Band 9)

Key Vocabulary

1. Allocation (noun) - the action of distributing resources or tasks. Example: The allocation of funds to space exploration is a contentious issue.
2. Proponents (noun) - people who support a particular idea or cause. Example: Proponents of space exploration highlight its scientific benefits.
3. Terrestrial (adjective) - relating to the Earth. Example: Terrestrial issues include poverty and environmental degradation.
4. Dichotomy (noun) - a division or contrast between two things. Example: The dichotomy between space exploration and Earthly issues is complex.
5. Catalyzes (verb) - to cause or accelerate a reaction. Example: Space exploration catalyzes technological innovation.
6. Exorbitant (adjective) - excessively high or great. Example: The exorbitant costs of space exploration are a concern.
7. Mitigate (verb) - to make less severe or serious. Example: Investing in renewable energy could mitigate climate change.
8. Nuanced (adjective) - characterized by subtle differences or shades of meaning. Example: A nuanced approach is necessary for resource allocation.
9. Invaluable (adjective) - extremely useful or important. Example: Space exploration offers invaluable insights.
10. Imperative (adjective) - of vital importance. Example: It is imperative to address urgent issues on Earth.
11. Prosperous (adjective) - successful and flourishing. Example: A balanced approach ensures a prosperous future.
12. Contentious (adjective) - causing or likely to cause disagreement. Example: The allocation of funds is a contentious issue.
13. Diverting (verb) - to turn aside or away from a path or course. Example: Diverting funds to combat poverty could enhance quality of life.
14. Integral (adjective) - necessary to make a whole complete. Example: Satellite imagery is integral to modern navigation.
15. Enhance (verb) - to increase or improve in value, quality, or extent. Example: Investing in healthcare could enhance the quality of life.
16. Adverse (adjective) - harmful or unfavorable. Example: The adverse effects of climate change are a concern.
17. Judiciously (adverb) - in a careful and thoughtful manner. Example: Resources should be allocated judiciously.
18. Sustainable (adjective) - able to be maintained at a certain rate or level. Example: A balanced approach is essential for sustainable development.
19. Prosperous (adjective) - successful and flourishing. Example: A balanced approach ensures a prosperous future.
20. Contentious (adjective) - causing or likely to cause disagreement. Example: The allocation of funds is a contentious issue.

Common Mistakes

1. Lack of Clear Position: Failing to present a clear stance on the issue in the introduction.
2. Inadequate Development: Not providing sufficient examples or explanations to support arguments.
3. Poor Organization: Using unclear paragraphing or connectives, making the response difficult to follow.
4. Limited Vocabulary: Using repetitive or basic vocabulary instead of a wide range of academic terms.
5. Grammatical Errors: Making frequent grammatical mistakes that detract from the overall quality of the response.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your score.