IELTS Writing Task 2: Scientific Funding Discussion Sample Band 9

Related guides:

• IELTS Writing Task 2 Deforestation Two Part Question Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Recycling (Discussion) — Band 6/7/8/9…
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Renewable Energy Two Part Question…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Climate Change Discussion Sample Band…
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Renewable Energy Agree Disagree Sample…

Prompt

Some people argue that governments should spend more money on scientific research, while others believe that funds should be allocated to other areas. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

Scientific research is important, but other things need money too.

Some people say governments should spend more on science. They think it helps us understand the world and create new technologies. For example, medical research can lead to cures for diseases. However, other people think money should go to things like education or infrastructure. They argue that schools and roads are more important for daily life.

I think both are important. Science is good, but we also need good schools and hospitals. Maybe governments should spend money on both. If they focus too much on one thing, other areas will suffer.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 5.0 - Presents a position but with limited development and unclear focus.
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 6.0 - Ideas are logically organized but with some repetition and lack of cohesive devices.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 - Uses some appropriate vocabulary but with errors and limited range.
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 - Sentence structures are simple with frequent errors.

Band 7.0 Answer

The allocation of government funds between scientific research and other sectors is a contentious issue.

Proponents of increased spending on scientific research argue that it drives innovation and economic growth. For instance, breakthroughs in renewable energy can reduce dependence on fossil fuels. Conversely, advocates for funding other areas contend that basic services like healthcare and transportation are more pressing. They point out that investing in these sectors can improve quality of life more immediately.

In my view, a balanced approach is necessary. While scientific research is crucial for long-term progress, neglecting essential services can lead to social instability. Governments should prioritize both, ensuring that funds are allocated based on the specific needs of their population.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 7.0 - Presents a clear position with some development and relevant examples.
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 7.0 - Ideas are logically organized with some cohesive devices but occasional lapses in clarity.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 - Uses a mix of appropriate vocabulary with some errors and limited range.
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 - Sentence structures are varied but with some errors.

Band 8.0 Answer

The debate over whether governments should prioritize scientific research funding or allocate resources to other sectors is multifaceted.

Those who advocate for increased investment in scientific research highlight its potential to address global challenges. For example, advancements in biotechnology can lead to innovative medical treatments, while research in climate science can inform policies to mitigate environmental degradation. On the other hand, critics argue that funding should be directed towards sectors that have a more immediate impact on societal well-being, such as education and public health. They contend that investing in these areas can lead to more equitable and sustainable development.

In my opinion, a balanced approach is essential. While scientific research is indispensable for long-term progress, neglecting essential services can lead to social and economic disparities. Governments should prioritize both, ensuring that funds are allocated based on the specific needs of their population.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 8.0 - Presents a clear position with well-developed arguments and relevant examples.
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 8.0 - Ideas are logically organized with a range of cohesive devices and clear progression.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 - Uses a wide range of appropriate vocabulary with some errors but minimal impact on communication.
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 - Sentence structures are varied and generally accurate with some errors.

Band 9.0 Answer

The allocation of government funds between scientific research and other sectors is a contentious issue that requires careful consideration.

Proponents of increased spending on scientific research argue that it drives innovation and economic growth. For instance, breakthroughs in renewable energy can reduce dependence on fossil fuels, while advancements in medical research can lead to innovative treatments for diseases. Furthermore, scientific research can address global challenges such as climate change and food security, which have far-reaching implications for future generations.

Conversely, advocates for funding other areas contend that basic services like healthcare and transportation are more pressing. They point out that investing in these sectors can improve quality of life more immediately, particularly in developing countries where access to essential services is limited. Additionally, education is crucial for equipping the workforce with the skills needed to drive economic growth and innovation.

In my view, a balanced approach is necessary. While scientific research is crucial for long-term progress, neglecting essential services can lead to social instability and economic disparities. Governments should prioritize both, ensuring that funds are allocated based on the specific needs of their population. This approach not only addresses immediate concerns but also lays the foundation for sustainable development and innovation.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 9.0 - Presents a clear position with fully developed arguments and relevant, extended examples.
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 9.0 - Ideas are logically organized with a wide range of cohesive devices and clear progression.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 9.0 - Uses a wide range of appropriate vocabulary with rare errors and sophisticated collocations.
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 9.0 - Sentence structures are varied and accurate with minimal errors.

Key Vocabulary

1. Allocation (noun): The action of distributing resources. Example: The allocation of funds was based on the specific needs of the population.
2. Contentious (adjective): Causing or likely to cause disagreement. Example: The contentious issue of funding allocation was debated for hours.
3. Breakthroughs (noun): Significant advancements or discoveries. Example: Breakthroughs in medical research have led to new treatments.
4. Mitigate (verb): To make less severe or serious. Example: Policies to mitigate environmental degradation are essential.
5. Equitable (adjective): Fair and just. Example: An equitable distribution of resources is crucial for development.
6. Sustainable (adjective): Able to be maintained at a certain rate or level. Example: Sustainable development requires long-term planning.
7. Implications (noun): The consequences of an action or decision. Example: The implications of the new policy were far-reaching.
8. Pressing (adjective): Requiring immediate attention. Example: The pressing need for healthcare funding was evident.
9. Disparities (noun): Differences or inequalities. Example: Economic disparities can lead to social instability.
10. Innovation (noun): The introduction of new ideas or methods. Example: Innovation is key to economic growth.
11. Proponents (noun): Supporters or advocates. Example: Proponents of the new policy argued for its benefits.
12. Critics (noun): People who express disapproval. Example: Critics of the policy highlighted its flaws.
13. Indispensable (adjective): Absolutely necessary. Example: Scientific research is indispensable for progress.
14. Equipping (verb): Providing with necessary resources. Example: Equipping the workforce with skills is crucial.
15. Lays the foundation (phrase): Establishes the basis. Example: This approach lays the foundation for sustainable development.

Common Mistakes

1. Lack of Clear Position: Many students present both sides but fail to clearly state their opinion.
2. Insufficient Examples: Some answers lack specific examples to support arguments.
3. Repetition: Repeating the same points without adding new information.
4. Grammatical Errors: Frequent grammatical mistakes can lower the score.
5. Poor Organization: Ideas may be jumbled or lack logical flow.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your score.