IELTS Writing Task 2: Road Safety (Two Part Question) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

• IELTS Writing Task 2 Deforestation Two Part Question Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Renewable Energy Two Part Question…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Plastic Pollution (Advantages…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Recycling (Discussion) — Band 6/7/8/9…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Climate Change Discussion Sample Band…

Prompt

Some people believe that the best way to reduce road accidents is to impose stricter penalties on drivers. Others argue that improving road infrastructure and vehicle technology is more effective. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

The problem of road accidents is serious. Some people think stricter punishments for drivers can solve this. Others believe better roads and car technology are better solutions. I think both are important.

Firstly, stricter penalties can reduce accidents. If drivers know they will be punished, they will drive more carefully. For example, in Singapore, heavy fines have reduced speeding. However, punishments alone are not enough. Some drivers will still break rules if they think they won't get caught.

Secondly, improving roads and cars can help. Better road signs and lights can prevent accidents. Also, new car technologies like automatic braking can save lives. For instance, many modern cars have systems that prevent collisions. But even with good roads and cars, some drivers still make mistakes.

In conclusion, both stricter penalties and better infrastructure are needed. Punishments make drivers more careful, but good roads and cars prevent accidents. Governments should use both methods to reduce road accidents.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 5.0 - Presents a clear position but with some repetition and limited development of ideas.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 6.0 - Uses some cohesive devices but with some awkward transitions and unclear progression.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 - Uses a mix of appropriate and less precise vocabulary with some errors in word choice.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with frequent grammatical errors.

Band 7.0 Answer

Road safety is a critical issue, and opinions differ on the most effective solutions. While some advocate for stricter penalties, others emphasize improving infrastructure and vehicle technology. Both approaches have merits and should be implemented together.

On one hand, stricter penalties can deter reckless driving. For example, countries with harsh penalties for drunk driving have seen a decrease in related accidents. However, this approach has limitations. Some drivers may still take risks if they believe they can avoid detection. Additionally, over-reliance on penalties may not address the root causes of accidents, such as poor road conditions or outdated vehicle technology.

On the other hand, improving infrastructure and vehicle technology can significantly enhance road safety. Well-designed roads with clear signage and adequate lighting can reduce the likelihood of accidents. Furthermore, advancements in vehicle technology, such as lane-keeping assist and automatic emergency braking, can prevent collisions. For instance, studies have shown that vehicles equipped with these technologies have lower accident rates. However, even the best infrastructure and technology cannot compensate for human error, which is why a combination of approaches is necessary.

In conclusion, both stricter penalties and improved infrastructure and technology are essential for reducing road accidents. Governments should focus on implementing both strategies to create a safer driving environment.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 7.0 - Presents a clear position with relevant, extended, and supported ideas.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 7.0 - Uses cohesive devices effectively but with some less sophisticated transitions.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 - Uses a range of vocabulary with some less precise word choices and occasional errors.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with some grammatical errors.

Band 8.0 Answer

The issue of road safety has garnered significant attention, with differing opinions on the most effective measures to mitigate accidents. While some advocate for stricter penalties, others emphasize the importance of enhancing road infrastructure and vehicle technology. A balanced approach incorporating both strategies is essential.

Proponents of stricter penalties argue that harsher punishments can deter dangerous driving behaviors. For instance, countries that have implemented severe penalties for speeding and drunk driving have observed a notable reduction in related accidents. However, this approach has its limitations. Some drivers may still engage in reckless behavior if they believe they can evade detection. Moreover, an overemphasis on penalties may not address the underlying causes of accidents, such as inadequate road conditions or outdated vehicle technology.

Conversely, improving road infrastructure and vehicle technology can substantially enhance road safety. Well-planned roads with clear signage and adequate lighting can minimize the risk of accidents. Additionally, advancements in vehicle technology, such as adaptive cruise control and collision avoidance systems, can prevent collisions. For example, research has demonstrated that vehicles equipped with these technologies have lower accident rates. Nevertheless, even the most advanced infrastructure and technology cannot entirely eliminate human error, which is why a comprehensive strategy is necessary.

In conclusion, both stricter penalties and improved infrastructure and technology are crucial for reducing road accidents. Governments should prioritize implementing both strategies to create a safer driving environment.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 8.0 - Presents a clear position with relevant, extended, and supported ideas, demonstrating a clear progression and development.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 8.0 - Uses cohesive devices effectively with a clear progression and logical flow.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 - Uses a range of vocabulary with precise word choices and minimal errors.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with minimal grammatical errors.

Band 9.0 Answer

The pervasive issue of road safety has sparked a debate on the most effective measures to curb accidents. While some advocate for stricter penalties, others emphasize the need for enhanced road infrastructure and vehicle technology. A multifaceted approach that integrates both strategies is imperative.

Advocates for stricter penalties contend that harsher punishments can deter dangerous driving behaviors. For example, nations that have enforced severe penalties for speeding and drunk driving have witnessed a significant decline in related accidents. However, this approach is not without its drawbacks. Some drivers may still engage in reckless behavior if they believe they can evade detection. Furthermore, an overemphasis on penalties may not address the root causes of accidents, such as substandard road conditions or antiquated vehicle technology.

Conversely, enhancing road infrastructure and vehicle technology can markedly improve road safety. Well-designed roads with clear signage and adequate lighting can mitigate the risk of accidents. Moreover, advancements in vehicle technology, such as lane-departure warnings and automatic emergency braking, can prevent collisions. For instance, studies have shown that vehicles equipped with these technologies have lower accident rates. Nonetheless, even the most advanced infrastructure and technology cannot entirely eradicate human error, which is why a holistic strategy is essential.

In conclusion, both stricter penalties and improved infrastructure and technology are vital for reducing road accidents. Governments should prioritize implementing both strategies to foster a safer driving environment.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 9.0 - Presents a clear position with relevant, extended, and supported ideas, demonstrating a clear progression and development with a sophisticated argument.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 9.0 - Uses cohesive devices effectively with a clear progression, logical flow, and sophisticated transitions.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 9.0 - Uses a wide range of vocabulary with precise word choices and minimal errors, demonstrating a sophisticated use of vocabulary.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 9.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with minimal grammatical errors, demonstrating a sophisticated use of grammar.

Vocabulary Highlights

1. Pervasive (adj.): Widespread; prevalent.

• Example: The pervasive issue of road safety has sparked a debate.

1. Mitigate (v.): Make less severe, serious, or painful.

• Example: Well-designed roads can mitigate the risk of accidents.

1. Antiquated (adj.): Old-fashioned or outdated.

• Example: Antiquated vehicle technology can contribute to accidents.

1. Holistic (adj.): Characterized by the belief that the parts of something are intimately interconnected and explicable only by reference to the whole.

• Example: A holistic strategy is essential for improving road safety.

1. Enforce (v.): Compel observance of or compliance with (a law, rule, or obligation).

• Example: Nations that enforce severe penalties have seen a decline in accidents.

1. Deter (v.): Discourage someone from doing something by instilling doubt or fear of the consequences.

• Example: Harsher punishments can deter dangerous driving behaviors.

1. Reckless (adj.): Without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action.

• Example: Some drivers may still engage in reckless behavior.

1. Evade (v.): Escape or avoid (someone or something), typically in a skillful or cunning way.

• Example: Some drivers may still engage in reckless behavior if they believe they can evade detection.

1. Substandard (adj.): Below the usual or required standard.

• Example: Substandard road conditions can contribute to accidents.

1. Markedly (adv.): In a way that is easily noticed; distinctly.

• Example: Enhancing road infrastructure can markedly improve road safety.

1. Mitigate (v.): Make less severe, serious, or painful.

• Example: Well-designed roads can mitigate the risk of accidents.

1. Eradicate (v.): Destroy completely; put an end to.

• Example: Even the most advanced technology cannot eradicate human error.

1. Holistic (adj.): Characterized by the belief that the parts of something are intimately interconnected and explicable only by reference to the whole.

• Example: A holistic strategy is essential for improving road safety.

1. Enforce (v.): Compel observance of or compliance with (a law, rule, or obligation).

• Example: Nations that enforce severe penalties have seen a decline in accidents.

1. Deter (v.): Discourage someone from doing something by instilling doubt or fear of the consequences.

• Example: Harsher punishments can deter dangerous driving behaviors.

1. Reckless (adj.): Without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action.

• Example: Some drivers may still engage in reckless behavior.

1. Evade (v.): Escape or avoid (someone or something), typically in a skillful or cunning way.

• Example: Some drivers may still engage in reckless behavior if they believe they can evade detection.

1. Substandard (adj.): Below the usual or required standard.

• Example: Substandard road conditions can contribute to accidents.

1. Markedly (adv.): In a way that is easily noticed; distinctly.

• Example: Enhancing road infrastructure can markedly improve road safety.

1. Mitigate (v.): Make less severe, serious, or painful.

• Example: Well-designed roads can mitigate the risk of accidents.

Common Mistakes

1. Overgeneralizing: Students often make broad statements without providing specific examples or evidence to support their claims.
2. Lack of Balance: Failing to discuss both views equally can result in a lower score for task response.
3. Poor Vocabulary Choices: Using vague or inappropriate words can detract from the overall quality of the essay.
4. Grammatical Errors: Common grammatical mistakes, such as subject-verb agreement errors and incorrect tense usage, can lower the score for grammatical range and accuracy.
5. Weak Cohesion: Poor use of cohesive devices can make the essay difficult to follow and reduce the score for coherence and cohesion.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 responses scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your score.