IELTS Writing Task 2: Road Safety (Advantages Disadvantages) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

• IELTS Writing Task 2: Recycling (Discussion) — Band 6/7/8/9…
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Deforestation Two Part Question Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Renewable Energy Two Part Question…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Climate Change Discussion Sample Band…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Plastic Pollution (Advantages…

The Prompt

IELTS Writing Task 2 Prompt (Paraphrased)

Some people believe that governments should invest more in road safety measures to reduce accidents. Others argue that this investment is not justified. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

Score Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 5.0 - Presents a position but with some irrelevant points
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 6.0 - Ideas are logically organized but with some unclear connections
• Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 - Uses some appropriate vocabulary but with frequent errors
• Grammar (GRA): 6.0 - Makes frequent grammatical errors that hinder understanding

Answer:

There are many accidents on the road. Some people say government should spend more money on safety. Others think this is not good. I think both sides have good points.

First, more safety can help. If there are more signs and lights, people will drive safer. Also, if police check more, people will not speed. This can make less accidents. But, it costs a lot of money. Maybe this money can be used for other things like hospitals or schools. Some people think this is better.

I think both are important. Safety is good but we need to think about cost too. Maybe government can find a balance. They can spend some money on safety but not too much. This way, we can have safer roads and still have money for other things.

Band 7.0 Answer

Score Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 7.0 - Presents a clear position with relevant points
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 7.0 - Ideas are logically organized with clear connections
• Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 - Uses a mix of appropriate vocabulary with some errors
• Grammar (GRA): 7.0 - Makes some grammatical errors but generally understandable

Answer:

The issue of road safety is a contentious one, with varying opinions on whether governments should invest more in this area. This essay will discuss both views before presenting a personal stance.

On one hand, investing in road safety can yield significant benefits. Improved infrastructure, such as better signage and lighting, can reduce the number of accidents. Additionally, increased police presence can deter reckless driving. According to a study by the World Health Organization, better road safety measures can save thousands of lives annually. However, critics argue that such investments are costly and may divert funds from other essential services like healthcare and education. They contend that individuals should take more responsibility for their own safety.

In my opinion, a balanced approach is necessary. Governments should invest in road safety measures, but individuals must also take responsibility for their actions. By working together, we can create safer roads without overburdening public funds.

Band 8.0 Answer

Score Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 8.0 - Presents a clear position with well-developed points
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 8.0 - Ideas are logically organized with clear and varied connections
• Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 - Uses a wide range of appropriate vocabulary with few errors
• Grammar (GRA): 8.0 - Makes occasional grammatical errors but generally accurate

Answer:

The debate surrounding government investment in road safety measures is multifaceted, with compelling arguments on both sides. This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of such investments before presenting a personal perspective.

Proponents of increased government spending on road safety argue that it can significantly reduce the number of accidents. Enhanced infrastructure, such as improved road design and advanced traffic management systems, can create a safer driving environment. For instance, the implementation of intelligent transport systems in cities like Singapore has led to a notable decrease in road accidents. Moreover, increased enforcement of traffic laws can deter dangerous driving behaviors. However, opponents contend that such investments are exorbitant and may divert funds from other critical areas. They argue that personal responsibility and education are more effective in promoting road safety.

In my view, a balanced approach is essential. Governments should invest in road safety measures, but individuals must also take responsibility for their actions. By working together, we can create safer roads without overburdening public funds. Education and awareness campaigns can complement government investments, ensuring a comprehensive approach to road safety.

Band 9.0 Answer

Score Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 9.0 - Presents a clear position with fully developed points and examples
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 9.0 - Ideas are logically organized with clear and varied connections
• Lexical Resource (LR): 9.0 - Uses a wide range of appropriate vocabulary with precise usage
• Grammar (GRA): 9.0 - Uses a wide range of grammatical structures accurately

Answer:

The contentious issue of government investment in road safety measures has sparked a heated debate, with proponents and opponents presenting compelling arguments. This essay will delve into the advantages and disadvantages of such investments before presenting a nuanced perspective.

Advocates of increased government spending on road safety assert that it can substantially mitigate the number of accidents. Enhanced infrastructure, such as the installation of advanced traffic signals and the implementation of intelligent transport systems, can create a safer driving environment. For example, the introduction of smart traffic lights in cities like Barcelona has led to a significant reduction in road accidents. Furthermore, increased enforcement of traffic laws can deter reckless driving behaviors. However, detractors argue that such investments are prohibitively expensive and may divert funds from other critical areas. They contend that personal responsibility and education are more effective in promoting road safety.

In my opinion, a balanced approach is crucial. Governments should invest in road safety measures, but individuals must also take responsibility for their actions. By working together, we can create safer roads without overburdening public funds. Education and awareness campaigns can complement government investments, ensuring a comprehensive approach to road safety. Additionally, public-private partnerships can help share the financial burden, making road safety measures more sustainable.

Vocabulary Highlights

1. Contentious (adj): Controversial, debated

• Example: The issue of road safety is a contentious one.

1. Yield (v): Produce, result in

• Example: Investing in road safety can yield significant benefits.

1. Deter (v): Discourage, prevent

• Example: Increased police presence can deter reckless driving.

1. Exorbitant (adj): Extremely high, unreasonable

• Example: Such investments are exorbitant and may divert funds.

1. Complement (v): Enhance, supplement

• Example: Education and awareness campaigns can complement government investments.

1. Mitigate (v): Reduce, lessen

• Example: Enhanced infrastructure can mitigate the number of accidents.

1. Prohibitively (adv): Extremely, excessively

• Example: Such investments are prohibitively expensive.

1. Nuanced (adj): Subtle, detailed

• Example: This essay will present a nuanced perspective.

1. Proponents (n): Supporters, advocates

• Example: Proponents of increased government spending argue...

1. Detractors (n): Critics, opponents

• Example: Detractors argue that such investments are expensive.

1. Sustainable (adj): Maintainable, long-term

• Example: Public-private partnerships can make measures more sustainable.

1. Comprehensive (adj): Complete, thorough

• Example: A comprehensive approach to road safety.

1. Implementation (n): Execution, application

• Example: The implementation of intelligent transport systems.

1. Reckless (adj): Careless, irresponsible

• Example: Increased enforcement can deter reckless driving.

1. Substantially (adv): Significantly, considerably

• Example: Enhanced infrastructure can substantially reduce accidents.

1. Burden (n): Load, responsibility

• Example: Without overburdening public funds.

1. Advocate (v): Support, promote

• Example: Advocates of increased government spending argue...

1. Mitigate (v): Reduce, lessen

• Example: Enhanced infrastructure can mitigate the number of accidents.

1. Prohibitively (adv): Extremely, excessively

• Example: Such investments are prohibitively expensive.

1. Nuanced (adj): Subtle, detailed

• Example: This essay will present a nuanced perspective.

Common Mistakes Students Make

1. Lack of Balance: Failing to discuss both sides of the argument equally.
2. Irrelevant Points: Including points that do not directly address the prompt.
3. Weak Vocabulary: Using basic or incorrect vocabulary that does not convey the intended meaning.
4. Poor Grammar: Making frequent grammatical errors that hinder understanding.
5. Lack of Examples: Failing to provide specific examples to support arguments.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your score.