English guide
Get a Band 6.0 sample answer for IELTS Writing Task 2 on renewable technology with full scoring breakdown and 50+ vocabulary terms
What this guide covers
Search answer
Get a Band 6.0 sample answer for IELTS Writing Task 2 on renewable technology with full scoring breakdown and 50+ vocabulary terms
Related guides:
Many people believe that governments should invest more in renewable technology. However, others argue that the cost of developing these technologies is too high for the benefits they provide.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Task Response (TR): 6.0 – Presents a clear position but with limited development and some repetition Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 6.0 – Ideas are logically organized but with some abrupt transitions Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 – Uses some less common vocabulary but with frequent inaccuracies Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 – Produces simple sentences with some complex ones that contain errors
Some people think that governments should spend more money on renewable technology while others disagree because of the high costs. In my opinion, renewable technology is worth investing in.
On the one hand, those who support investing in renewable technology argue that it will reduce pollution and help the environment. For example, solar and wind energy do not produce harmful gases like coal and oil. Additionally, renewable energy can create jobs in new industries. However, these benefits may not be seen immediately, and some people believe the money could be better spent on other things.
On the other hand, opponents of investing in renewable technology argue that the costs are too high. Developing new technologies requires a lot of money, and there is no guarantee that they will be successful. Furthermore, some people believe that traditional energy sources like oil and gas are still necessary for the foreseeable future. They argue that governments should focus on making these industries cleaner and more efficient instead.
In conclusion, while the costs of developing renewable technology are high, I believe that the long-term benefits outweigh the short-term expenses. Governments should invest in renewable technology to protect the environment and create new jobs.
Task Response (TR): 7.0 – Presents a clear position with relevant, extended ideas and some supporting details Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 7.0 – Uses coherent paragraphs and clear linking ideas Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 – Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary with some less common lexical items Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 – Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with some errors
The issue of whether governments should invest more in renewable technology is a contentious one. While some argue that the financial burden is too great, I believe that the long-term benefits make it a worthwhile investment.
Those who oppose increased investment in renewable technology often cite the high costs involved. Developing new technologies requires significant financial resources, and there is always a risk that these investments may not yield the desired results. Additionally, some people believe that traditional energy sources like oil and gas will continue to be necessary for many years to come. They argue that governments should focus on improving the efficiency and reducing the environmental impact of these industries.
However, I believe that the potential benefits of renewable technology outweigh the costs. Renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power produce far fewer greenhouse gas emissions than fossil fuels, making them an important tool in the fight against climate change. Moreover, investing in renewable technology can create new jobs and stimulate economic growth in green industries. For example, countries like Germany and Denmark have successfully transitioned to renewable energy sources and have seen significant economic benefits as a result.
In conclusion, while the initial costs of investing in renewable technology may be high, the long-term benefits for the environment and the economy make it a wise investment for governments to pursue.
Task Response (TR): 8.0 – Presents a clear position with fully extended and supported ideas Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 8.0 – Uses cohesive devices effectively to guide the reader Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 – Uses a wide range of vocabulary with less common lexical items used appropriately Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 – Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with frequent error-free sentences
The debate over whether governments should allocate more funds to renewable technology is a pressing one. While critics argue that the financial implications are prohibitive, I firmly believe that the long-term advantages make it an essential investment.
Opponents of increased investment in renewable technology often highlight the substantial financial outlay required. The development of new technologies is capital-intensive, and there is no guarantee of immediate returns. Moreover, some individuals contend that conventional energy sources will remain indispensable in the foreseeable future. They advocate for a focus on enhancing the efficiency and reducing the environmental footprint of these industries through advancements in clean coal technology and carbon capture and storage.
However, the potential benefits of renewable technology are manifold. Renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and tidal power generate minimal greenhouse gas emissions, making them crucial in mitigating climate change. Furthermore, the transition to renewable energy can drive job creation and economic growth in green sectors. For instance, countries like Sweden and Costa Rica have made significant strides in renewable energy adoption, resulting in reduced carbon emissions and increased economic prosperity.
Additionally, the long-term cost savings associated with renewable technology are substantial. While the initial investment may be high, the operational costs of renewable energy sources are significantly lower than those of fossil fuels. This can lead to long-term savings for both governments and consumers. For example, the cost of solar panels has decreased by over 70% in the past decade, making solar energy more accessible and affordable.
In conclusion, the initial financial outlay for renewable technology is high, but the long-term benefits for the environment, the economy, and public health make it a prudent investment for governments to prioritize.
Task Response (TR): 9.0 – Presents a clear position with fully extended and supported ideas, using relevant examples Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 9.0 – Uses cohesive devices skilfully to guide the reader Lexical Resource (LR): 9.0 – Uses a wide range of vocabulary with less common lexical items used appropriately and flexibly Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 9.0 – Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with frequent error-free sentences
The question of whether governments should invest more in renewable technology is a complex one. Critics argue that the financial burden is too great, but I contend that the long-term benefits make it an investment we cannot afford to ignore.
Those who oppose increased investment in renewable technology often point to the substantial financial resources required. Developing new technologies is a costly endeavor, and there is always a risk that these investments may not yield the desired results. Furthermore, some individuals argue that traditional energy sources like oil and gas will remain essential for many years to come. They advocate for a focus on improving the efficiency and reducing the environmental impact of these industries through advancements in clean coal technology and carbon capture and storage.
However, the potential benefits of renewable technology are far-reaching. Renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and geothermal power produce minimal greenhouse gas emissions, making them vital in the fight against climate change. Moreover, the transition to renewable energy can stimulate job creation and economic growth in green sectors. For example, countries like Norway and Iceland have successfully harnessed their natural resources to generate renewable energy, resulting in reduced carbon emissions and increased economic prosperity.
Additionally, the long-term cost savings associated with renewable technology are substantial. While the initial investment may be high, the operational costs of renewable energy sources are significantly lower than those of fossil fuels. This can lead to long-term savings for both governments and consumers. For instance, the cost of wind turbines has decreased by over 50% in the past decade, making wind energy more accessible and affordable.
Furthermore, investing in renewable technology can enhance energy security and reduce dependence on imported fuels. Many countries rely on imported oil and gas, making them vulnerable to price fluctuations and geopolitical instability. By investing in domestic renewable energy sources, governments can reduce this dependence and enhance their energy security.
In conclusion, the initial financial outlay for renewable technology is high, but the long-term benefits for the environment, the economy, public health, and energy security make it an investment that governments should prioritize.
Ready to check your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response? Upload your essay to English AIdol for an instant AI score and detailed feedback. Our advanced algorithms analyze your writing against official IELTS criteria to help you improve your score.