IELTS Writing Task 2: Renewable Technology (Agree Disagree) - Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

• IELTS Writing Task 2 Rehabilitation: Band 9.0 Sample Answer
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Juvenile Justice - Band 7.0 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Juvenile Justice – Band 8.0 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Road Safety – Band 8.0 Sample with…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Traffic Congestion - Band 6.5 Sample…

The Prompt

Sample Prompt: Some people believe that governments should invest in renewable technology to address environmental issues. Others argue that this is a waste of money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): Presents a position but with limited development
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized but with some repetition
• Lexical Resource (LR): Uses some appropriate vocabulary but with errors
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): Makes frequent grammatical mistakes

Answer:

Many people think that governments should spend money on renewable technology because it can help the environment. However, others say this is a waste of money. I agree with the first view.

Firstly, renewable technology like solar and wind power can reduce pollution. Factories and cars make a lot of pollution, which is bad for the air and health. Renewable energy can make less pollution. For example, countries like Germany use a lot of wind power and have cleaner air.

Secondly, renewable technology can create jobs. Building wind farms and solar panels needs workers. This can help people find jobs and make money. In the USA, many jobs are in renewable energy now.

But some people say renewable technology is expensive. They think governments should spend money on other things like hospitals or schools. While this is true, in the long run, renewable technology can save money because it does not need fuel like oil or gas.

In conclusion, I believe governments should invest in renewable technology. It can help the environment and create jobs. Although it is expensive, it is a good investment for the future.

Band 7.0 Answer

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with relevant examples
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized with clear progression
• Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a mix of appropriate vocabulary
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): Makes some grammatical mistakes but generally accurate

Answer:

The debate over whether governments should invest in renewable technology is a contentious one. While some argue that such investments are futile, I firmly believe that they are essential for addressing environmental issues and ensuring long-term economic stability.

On one hand, opponents of renewable technology investments contend that these initiatives are financially burdensome. They argue that the high initial costs of developing and implementing renewable energy infrastructure outweigh the benefits. For instance, critics often cite the substantial investments required for research and development, as well as the need for significant infrastructure upgrades. Moreover, they point out that traditional energy sources, such as fossil fuels, are currently more cost-effective and reliable.

However, I contend that the long-term benefits of renewable technology far outweigh the initial costs. Renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, have the potential to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, thereby mitigating the adverse effects of climate change. For example, countries like Denmark have successfully integrated wind energy into their energy mix, resulting in a substantial reduction in carbon emissions. Additionally, renewable technology can foster economic growth by creating new industries and jobs. The renewable energy sector has the potential to generate employment opportunities in manufacturing, installation, and maintenance, thereby stimulating economic development.

In conclusion, while the initial costs of investing in renewable technology may be high, the long-term benefits for the environment and the economy are undeniable. Governments should prioritize these investments to ensure a sustainable future.

Band 8.0 Answer

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with well-developed arguments and examples
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and cohesive devices
• Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a wide range of appropriate vocabulary
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures accurately

Answer:

The question of whether governments should allocate funds to renewable technology is a topic of considerable debate. While some individuals argue that such investments are imprudent, I firmly believe that they are not only necessary but also beneficial in the long run.

Those who oppose government investment in renewable technology often cite the high initial costs and the perceived unreliability of renewable energy sources. They contend that traditional energy sources, such as fossil fuels, are more dependable and cost-effective. For instance, they argue that renewable energy infrastructure requires significant capital investment and that the technology is not yet advanced enough to provide a consistent energy supply. Additionally, they point out that the transition to renewable energy may lead to job losses in the traditional energy sector.

However, I contend that the long-term benefits of investing in renewable technology far outweigh the initial costs. Renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, have the potential to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, thereby mitigating the adverse effects of climate change. For example, countries like Germany have made substantial investments in renewable energy and have seen a significant reduction in their carbon footprint. Moreover, renewable technology can foster economic growth by creating new industries and jobs. The renewable energy sector has the potential to generate employment opportunities in manufacturing, installation, and maintenance, thereby stimulating economic development.

In conclusion, while the initial costs of investing in renewable technology may be high, the long-term benefits for the environment and the economy are undeniable. Governments should prioritize these investments to ensure a sustainable future.

Band 9.0 Answer

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with sophisticated arguments and examples
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and sophisticated cohesive devices
• Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a wide range of appropriate vocabulary with precision
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures accurately and effectively

Answer:

The proposition that governments should invest in renewable technology to address environmental issues has garnered significant attention. While some individuals argue that such investments are fiscally irresponsible, I firmly believe that they are not only prudent but also essential for ensuring long-term sustainability.

Opponents of government investment in renewable technology often cite the high initial costs and the perceived unreliability of renewable energy sources. They contend that traditional energy sources, such as fossil fuels, are more dependable and cost-effective. For instance, they argue that renewable energy infrastructure requires significant capital investment and that the technology is not yet advanced enough to provide a consistent energy supply. Additionally, they point out that the transition to renewable energy may lead to job losses in the traditional energy sector.

However, I contend that the long-term benefits of investing in renewable technology far outweigh the initial costs. Renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, have the potential to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, thereby mitigating the adverse effects of climate change. For example, countries like Denmark have made substantial investments in renewable energy and have seen a significant reduction in their carbon footprint. Moreover, renewable technology can foster economic growth by creating new industries and jobs. The renewable energy sector has the potential to generate employment opportunities in manufacturing, installation, and maintenance, thereby stimulating economic development.

In conclusion, while the initial costs of investing in renewable technology may be high, the long-term benefits for the environment and the economy are undeniable. Governments should prioritize these investments to ensure a sustainable future. By doing so, they can not only address pressing environmental issues but also foster economic growth and job creation.

Vocabulary Highlights

1. Renewable Technology: Energy sources that are naturally replenished, such as solar, wind, and hydro power.

• Collocation: renewable energy sources, renewable energy infrastructure

1. Environmental Issues: Problems affecting the natural world, such as pollution and climate change.

• Collocation: address environmental issues, pressing environmental concerns

1. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere, contributing to global warming.

• Collocation: reduce greenhouse gas emissions, mitigate greenhouse gas emissions

1. Economic Growth: The increase in the production of goods and services in an economy.

• Collocation: foster economic growth, stimulate economic development

1. Sustainable Future: A future that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

• Collocation: ensure a sustainable future, prioritize sustainability

1. Capital Investment: The money used by a business or organization to buy fixed assets.

• Collocation: significant capital investment, initial capital investment

1. Carbon Footprint: The total amount of greenhouse gases produced to directly and indirectly support human activities.

• Collocation: reduce carbon footprint, significant carbon footprint

1. Fossil Fuels: Natural fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas, formed from the remains of ancient organisms.

• Collocation: traditional energy sources, fossil fuel emissions

1. Job Creation: The process of generating new job opportunities.

• Collocation: create new jobs, generate employment opportunities

1. Climate Change: Long-term alterations in statistical distribution of weather patterns.

• Collocation: mitigate climate change, address climate change

1. Energy Infrastructure: The basic physical and organizational structures needed for the operation of an energy system.

• Collocation: renewable energy infrastructure, energy infrastructure upgrades

1. Fiscally Irresponsible: Not prudent in the management of financial resources.

• Collocation: fiscally irresponsible investments, fiscally prudent decisions

1. Long-Term Benefits: Advantages that occur over an extended period.

• Collocation: long-term benefits, long-term sustainability

1. Job Losses: The reduction in the number of employed individuals.

• Collocation: potential job losses, job losses in the traditional sector

1. Consistent Energy Supply: A reliable and steady provision of energy.

• Collocation: consistent energy supply, reliable energy supply

1. Stimulate Economic Development: To encourage or promote economic growth.

• Collocation: stimulate economic development, foster economic growth

1. Mitigate Adverse Effects: To make the negative impacts of something less severe.

• Collocation: mitigate adverse effects, reduce adverse impacts

1. Natural Replenished: The process by which natural resources are restored.

• Collocation: naturally replenished, renewable resources

1. Substantial Investments: Significant financial commitments.

• Collocation: substantial investments, significant capital investment

1. Pressing Environmental Concerns: Urgent issues related to the natural world.

• Collocation: pressing environmental concerns, address environmental issues

Common Mistakes

1. Lack of Clear Position: Failing to state a clear opinion on the topic.
2. Inadequate Examples: Providing vague or irrelevant examples to support arguments.
3. Poor Organization: Presenting ideas in a disorganized manner, making the essay difficult to follow.
4. Grammatical Errors: Making frequent grammatical mistakes that hinder comprehension.
5. Limited Vocabulary: Using a narrow range of vocabulary, resulting in repetitive and unengaging language.
6. Overgeneralization: Making broad statements without sufficient evidence or explanation.
7. Ignoring Counterarguments: Failing to acknowledge and address opposing views.
8. Repetition: Repeating the same ideas or phrases excessively.
9. Inaccurate Information: Providing incorrect or outdated information.
10. Poor Coherence: Failing to use cohesive devices effectively, leading to a disjointed essay.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your score.