English guide
Get a Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer on recycling with detailed scoring breakdown. Improve your writing skills with expert analysis.
What this guide covers
Search answer
Get a Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer on recycling with detailed scoring breakdown. Improve your writing skills with expert analysis.
Related guides:
> Some people believe that recycling is the best way to reduce waste, while others argue that it is not effective. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Task Response: The answer presents a position but lacks development. The arguments are simplistic and not fully extended. Coherence and Cohesion: The ideas are logically organized but the connections between them are sometimes unclear. Lexical Resource: The range of vocabulary is limited and some errors in word choice occur. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The answer contains frequent grammatical errors that sometimes impede understanding.
Recycling is a good way to reduce waste. Some people think it is the best solution. Others disagree. I think recycling helps the environment. First, it reduces the amount of trash in landfills. Also, it saves resources. For example, making new paper from old paper uses less water and energy. However, some people say recycling is not effective. They argue that it costs too much money. Also, not all materials can be recycled. In my opinion, recycling is still important. Governments should encourage more people to recycle. They can do this by providing more recycling bins and education. In conclusion, recycling is a good way to help the environment.
Task Response: The answer presents a clear position with some development. The arguments are relevant but not always supported by examples. Coherence and Cohesion: The ideas are logically organized and connected with appropriate cohesive devices. Lexical Resource: The range of vocabulary is sufficient but some errors in word choice and collocation occur. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The answer contains some complex sentence structures but also some grammatical errors.
Recycling is widely considered an effective method to reduce waste, but its efficiency is often debated. On one hand, recycling significantly diminishes the amount of waste sent to landfills, thereby reducing environmental pollution. For instance, recycling paper saves trees and reduces the energy required for producing new paper. Moreover, recycling conserves natural resources by reusing materials that would otherwise be discarded. On the other hand, critics argue that recycling can be costly and inefficient. The process of collecting, sorting, and processing recyclables requires substantial financial investment and energy. Additionally, not all materials are easily recyclable, which limits the overall effectiveness of recycling programs. In my view, despite these drawbacks, recycling remains a crucial strategy for waste management. Governments and individuals should continue to support and participate in recycling initiatives to promote a more sustainable future.
Task Response: The answer presents a clear position with thorough development and support. The arguments are well-extended and supported by relevant examples. Coherence and Cohesion: The ideas are logically organized and connected with a wide range of cohesive devices. Lexical Resource: The range of vocabulary is varied and precise, with only occasional errors in word choice. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The answer contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures with minimal grammatical errors.
Recycling has emerged as a pivotal strategy in the global effort to mitigate waste, but its efficacy is a subject of ongoing debate. Proponents of recycling assert that it plays a vital role in reducing environmental degradation. By recycling materials such as paper, plastic, and glass, we can significantly decrease the volume of waste that ends up in landfills, thereby minimizing soil and water pollution. Furthermore, recycling conserves valuable natural resources by reusing materials that would otherwise be extracted from the environment. For example, recycling aluminum cans saves up to 95% of the energy required to produce new aluminum. However, detractors argue that recycling is not a panacea for waste management issues. The process of recycling can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial energy and financial investment. Additionally, the effectiveness of recycling programs is often hampered by contamination and the limited recyclability of certain materials. Despite these challenges, I firmly believe that recycling remains an indispensable component of sustainable waste management. Governments should invest in advanced recycling technologies and educate the public about the importance of proper recycling practices. By doing so, we can maximize the benefits of recycling and move towards a more eco-friendly society.
Task Response: The answer presents a clear, informed, and supported position. The arguments are thoroughly developed and supported by relevant, extended, and supported examples. Coherence and Cohesion: The ideas are logically organized and connected with a wide range of cohesive devices, creating a clear progression throughout. Lexical Resource: The range of vocabulary is varied and precise, with sophisticated collocations and idiomatic expressions. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The answer contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures with minimal grammatical errors and a high degree of accuracy.
In the contemporary discourse on waste management, recycling has emerged as a cornerstone strategy, yet its efficacy is frequently called into question. Advocates of recycling contend that it is instrumental in alleviating the burden on landfills and conserving natural resources. For instance, the recycling of paper not only reduces the demand for virgin pulp but also decreases the energy and water consumption associated with paper production. Similarly, the recycling of plastics mitigates the environmental impact of petroleum-based products and reduces marine pollution. Moreover, recycling fosters a circular economy, where waste is transformed into a resource, thereby promoting sustainability. Nevertheless, skeptics argue that recycling is an imperfect solution, plagued by inefficiencies and economic constraints. The sorting and processing of recyclables require significant energy and financial resources, and the presence of contaminants can render recycled materials unusable. Furthermore, the recycling infrastructure in many regions is inadequate, limiting the overall impact of recycling initiatives. In my view, despite these challenges, recycling remains a vital tool in our arsenal against environmental degradation. To enhance its effectiveness, governments should invest in cutting-edge recycling technologies and implement comprehensive recycling programs. Additionally, public education campaigns should be launched to raise awareness about the importance of recycling and the proper sorting of waste. By embracing recycling as a societal norm, we can strive towards a more sustainable and eco-conscious future.
Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to help you improve your writing skills.