IELTS Writing Task 2: Public Libraries (Agree Disagree) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

• IELTS Writing Task 2 Renewable Energy Two Part Question…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Climate Change Discussion Sample Band…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Plastic Pollution (Advantages…
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Deforestation Two Part Question Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Recycling (Discussion) — Band 6/7/8/9…

Full Prompt

Some people think public libraries should be free for everyone. Others believe there should be a charge for using them. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

Public libraries are very important for society. Some people say they should be free but others think they should cost money. I agree with free libraries.

First, free libraries help poor people. Not everyone can afford to buy books. If libraries cost money, poor people cannot use them. This is not fair. Libraries should be for everyone, not just rich people. Also, libraries help children with their schoolwork. If they have to pay, some children might not get the help they need.

But some people say libraries cost a lot of money to run. They say the government should not pay for them. Maybe libraries could have some things that cost money, like special programs. But the books and basic services should be free. In my country, libraries are free and many people use them. This is a good system.

In conclusion, I think public libraries should be free. They help poor people and children. The government should pay for them. It is good for society.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 5.0 - Presents a position but with limited development and unclear opinion markers
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 6.0 - Uses basic connectors but some ideas are disjointed
• Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 - Attempts varied vocabulary but frequent errors and limited sophistication
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 - Mostly simple sentences with frequent errors

Band 7.0 Answer

The debate over whether public libraries should be free or require payment is complex and multifaceted. Both perspectives have merit, but I firmly believe libraries should remain free to all.

On one hand, those advocating for library fees argue that maintaining these institutions is expensive. They contend that charging users would alleviate some of the financial burden on taxpayers. Additionally, paid services might encourage better upkeep and organization of library resources. For instance, some private libraries operate on a membership basis and tend to have more modern facilities. However, these arguments overlook the fundamental purpose of public libraries: to serve the entire community.

Conversely, free public libraries democratize access to knowledge. They provide essential educational support, especially for underprivileged individuals who cannot afford private educational resources. According to a 2023 study by Cambridge Assessment English, 68% of low-income families rely on public libraries for their children's education. Furthermore, libraries foster community engagement and cultural exchange through free events and programs. Without this access, societal inequities would widen significantly.

In conclusion, while the financial arguments for paid libraries have some validity, the societal benefits of free access far outweigh them. Governments should continue to fund public libraries as a cornerstone of equitable education and community development.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 7.0 - Presents a clear position with some well-developed arguments
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 7.0 - Uses a mix of cohesive devices effectively but some transitions are mechanical
• Lexical Resource (LR): 7.5 - Demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary with occasional less common lexical items
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with some errors

Band 8.0 Answer

The notion of public libraries being free versus charging users is a contentious issue with compelling arguments on both sides. While I acknowledge the financial constraints of maintaining these institutions, I strongly advocate for their continued free access.

Proponents of paid libraries often cite the substantial operational costs involved in maintaining these facilities. They argue that implementing user fees could generate additional revenue, thereby reducing the financial strain on public budgets. Furthermore, proponents suggest that paid services might lead to improved maintenance and resource management. For example, some private libraries charge membership fees and consequently offer state-of-the-art amenities and extensive collections.

However, the societal benefits of free public libraries are manifold and indisputable. Primarily, they serve as equalizers, providing access to knowledge and educational resources for all members of society, regardless of their economic status. According to a 2024 report by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 72% of public library users in developing countries rely on these institutions for their primary educational needs. Additionally, libraries play a pivotal role in fostering community engagement through free programs and cultural events. Eliminating free access would exacerbate educational disparities and weaken community bonds.

In conclusion, while the financial arguments for paid libraries are not without merit, the societal advantages of maintaining free access are far more significant. Governments should prioritize funding public libraries to ensure equitable access to education and cultural enrichment.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 8.0 - Presents a clear position with well-developed and supported arguments
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 8.0 - Uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, though some transitions could be more sophisticated
• Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 - Demonstrates a wide range of vocabulary with frequent use of less common lexical items
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with some errors, but generally accurate

Band 9.0 Answer

The debate surrounding the financing of public libraries, whether they should be free or require user fees, is intrinsically linked to broader societal values of equity and access to knowledge. I contend that public libraries should remain free, notwithstanding the financial challenges involved.

Those advocating for the implementation of user fees present a compelling argument based on economic pragmatism. They posit that charging for library services could generate additional revenue, thereby alleviating the financial burden on public coffers. Moreover, proponents of this view suggest that paid services might incentivize better maintenance and more efficient resource management. For instance, some private libraries operate on a membership model and often boast superior facilities and extensive collections, notwithstanding their exclusivity.

However, the societal implications of maintaining free public libraries are profound and far-reaching. Primarily, they function as democratizing institutions, ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their socio-economic status, have access to educational resources. A 2024 study by the OECD revealed that in countries where public libraries are free, literacy rates are consistently higher among low-income populations. Furthermore, libraries serve as vital community hubs, hosting a plethora of cultural events and educational programs that foster social cohesion. The elimination of free access would not only widen educational disparities but also weaken the social fabric of communities.

In conclusion, while the economic arguments for paid libraries are not without validity, the societal benefits of maintaining free access are immeasurable. Governments should prioritize funding public libraries as a cornerstone of equitable education and community development. By doing so, they invest in the future of their citizens and the well-being of society at large.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): 9.0 - Presents a clear, informed position with fully developed and supported arguments
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 9.0 - Uses a wide range of cohesive devices effectively and naturally
• Lexical Resource (LR): 9.0 - Demonstrates a wide range of vocabulary with frequent use of sophisticated and less common lexical items
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 9.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with minimal errors

Key Vocabulary

1. Ubiquitous (adjective) - Found everywhere

• Example: Public libraries have become ubiquitous in modern societies.

1. Intricately linked (adjective) - Closely connected

• Example: The debate is intricately linked to broader societal values.

1. Notwithstanding (conjunction) - Despite

• Example: Notwithstanding the financial challenges, libraries should remain free.

1. Democratic (adjective) - Relating to equal rights and opportunities

• Example: Libraries serve as democratic institutions.

1. Indisputable (adjective) - Too clear or obvious to be denied or doubted

• Example: The benefits of free libraries are indisputable.

1. Manifold (adjective) - Many and various

• Example: The benefits of free libraries are manifold.

1. Pivotal (adjective) - Of crucial importance in relation to the development or success of something else

• Example: Libraries play a pivotal role in community engagement.

1. Exacerbate (verb) - Make a problem, bad situation, or negative feeling worse

• Example: Eliminating free access would exacerbate educational disparities.

1. Privatize (verb) - Transfer (a company, industry, or service) from public to private ownership and control

• Example: Some argue that libraries should be privatized.

1. Proponent (noun) - A person who supports or advocates a particular cause, idea, or policy

• Example: Proponents of paid libraries present compelling arguments.

1. Incentivize (verb) - Give someone a reason or motive for doing something

• Example: Paid services might incentivize better maintenance.

1. Exclusivity (noun) - The state of being available only to a limited number of people

• Example: Private libraries often boast exclusivity.

1. Cohesion (noun) - The quality of being clearly arranged and connected in a way that is easy to understand

• Example: The essay demonstrates strong cohesion.

1. Sophistication (noun) - Complexity resulting from having many parts

• Example: The essay shows a high level of sophistication in vocabulary.

1. Alleviate (verb) - Make (pain or suffering) less intense or severe

• *Example: Implementing fees could alleviate financial burdens.

1. Plagiarism (noun) - The practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own

• Example: Avoid plagiarism by properly citing sources.

1. Collocation (noun) - The habitual juxtaposition of a particular word with another word or words with a frequency greater than chance

• Example: 'Ubiquitous access' is a common collocation.

1. Conciseness (noun) - The quality of being clear, brief, and to the point

• Example: Conciseness is crucial in IELTS Writing Task 2.

1. Coherence (noun) - The quality of being logical and consistent

• Example: The essay demonstrates strong coherence.

1. Lexical Resource (noun) - The range of vocabulary used in a piece of writing

• Example: Lexical Resource is one of the four criteria in IELTS Writing Task 2.

Common Mistakes

1. Lack of Clear Position: Many students fail to present a clear opinion, making their essays vague and unclear.

1. Poor Vocabulary Choice: Using repetitive or inappropriate words can lower your Lexical Resource score.

1. Insufficient Examples: Not providing enough examples or data to support arguments weakens the Task Response score.

1. Grammar Errors: Frequent grammatical mistakes can significantly impact your Grammatical Range and Accuracy score.

1. Poor Coherence and Cohesion: Using too many simple connectors or not using them at all can make the essay difficult to follow.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 responses scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your score.