English guide
Get a Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer about police surveillance with expert scoring breakdown and vocabulary analysis.
What this guide covers
Search answer
Get a Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer about police surveillance with expert scoring breakdown and vocabulary analysis.
Related guides:
Some people believe that police officers should wear cameras at all times while working. Others think that this is an invasion of privacy. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people argue that police officers should wear cameras during their duties to ensure accountability, while others believe this is an invasion of privacy. Both views have merits, but I believe the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
On one hand, cameras can help protect both police officers and the public. For example, if an officer uses excessive force, the footage can be used as evidence in court. This can prevent false accusations against officers and ensure that justice is served. Additionally, cameras can deter misconduct by both parties, as people are less likely to act inappropriately when they know they are being recorded.
However, some people argue that wearing cameras is an invasion of privacy. Police officers may feel uncomfortable being recorded all the time, and innocent citizens might also be captured on camera. For instance, if an officer responds to a domestic dispute, the camera might record private family matters that should not be made public. This could lead to unnecessary stress and embarrassment for those involved.
In my opinion, the advantages of police wearing cameras outweigh the disadvantages. While privacy concerns are valid, they can be addressed with proper policies and training. For example, officers could be trained to respect privacy and only record when necessary. Additionally, footage could be stored securely and only accessed when there is a valid reason.
In conclusion, although there are valid concerns about privacy, the benefits of police officers wearing cameras are significant. This technology can help ensure that both officers and the public act appropriately and can provide valuable evidence in legal proceedings.
| Criteria | Band 7.0 Score | Explanation | |----------|--------------|-------------| | Task Response | 7.0 | Presents a clear position throughout the response. Presents, extends, and supports main trends, themes, or arguments but may not sustain focus throughout. Presents a conclusion which may lack development or may be repetitious. | | Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 | Uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical. There may be some overuse of cohesive devices. Arranges information and ideas into paragraphs, though there may be a tendency to over-generalize or support ideas by repetition. Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. Makes adequate, though possibly somewhat mechanical, use of cohesive devices. | | Lexical Resource | 7.0 | Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision. May make some errors in word choice, word formation, or collocation. Uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation. May produce occasional errors in word choice, and word formation that may cause some difficulty for the reader. | | Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 7.0 | Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. Makes frequent but not serious errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling. Error-free sentences outnumber error-containing sentences. May make some errors in or have inconsistent use of structures and patterns. |
| Word/Phrase | Definition | Example Sentence | |-------------|-------------|-----------------| | Accountability | The fact of being responsible for what you do and being able to give a satisfactory reason for it. | Cameras can help ensure accountability among police officers. | | Excessive force | Unnecessary or unreasonable force, especially by police. | The footage can be used as evidence if an officer uses excessive force. | | Deter | To discourage someone from doing something by making them afraid of the consequences. | Cameras can deter misconduct by both parties. | | Invasion of privacy | An act of intruding on someone's private life. | Some people believe that wearing cameras is an invasion of privacy. | | Domestic dispute | An argument or conflict between people living in the same household. | The camera might record private domestic disputes that should not be made public. | | Securely | In a safe and protected manner. | Footage could be stored securely and only accessed when necessary. | | Valuable evidence | Information that is useful and important in a legal context. | Cameras can provide valuable evidence in legal proceedings. | | Ensure | To make sure something happens or is definitely the case. | This technology can help ensure that both officers and the public act appropriately. | | Misconduct | Improper or unlawful conduct. | Cameras can deter misconduct by both parties. | | Unnecessary stress | Pressure or tension that is not needed or required. | This could lead to unnecessary stress and embarrassment for those involved. | | Repetitious | Repeating the same thing too many times. | The conclusion may be repetitious. | | Flexibility and precision | The ability to be adaptable and exact. | Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision. | | Mechanical | Lacking natural or spontaneous quality. | There may be a tendency to over-generalize or support ideas by repetition in a mechanical way. | | Overuse | Using something too much. | There may be some overuse of cohesive devices. | | Adequate | Sufficient for a particular purpose. | Makes adequate, though possibly somewhat mechanical, use of cohesive devices. | | Inconsistent | Not staying the same throughout. | May make some errors in or have inconsistent use of structures and patterns. | | Collocation | The habitual juxtaposition of a particular word with another word or words with a frequency greater than chance. | Uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation. |
Want to see how you'd score on this IELTS Writing Task 2 prompt? Try English AIdol's AI scoring tool to get instant feedback on your response.
IELTS Writing Task 2 is scored based on four criteria: Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. Each criterion is scored on a band scale from 0 to 9.
A Band 6.0 response presents a position but may not sustain focus throughout. It presents, extends, and supports main trends, themes, or arguments but may do so in a limited way. A Band 7.0 response presents a clear position throughout the response and presents, extends, and supports main trends, themes, or arguments with some development.
To improve your vocabulary, read widely from various sources such as newspapers, academic journals, and books. Practice using new words in context and avoid repeating the same words. Use a thesaurus to find synonyms and learn collocations to enhance your writing.
Common cohesive devices include transition words (e.g., however, moreover, nevertheless), pronouns (e.g., it, they, this), and conjunctions (e.g., because, although, despite). These devices help to connect ideas and make your writing more coherent.
Grammar is crucial in IELTS Writing Task 2. Errors in grammar can significantly impact your score, especially in the Grammatical Range and Accuracy criterion. Aim to use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and minimize grammatical errors.
Yes, you can use personal examples, but they should be relevant and support your argument. Avoid using overly personal or emotional language. Personal examples should be used to illustrate a point rather than as the main focus of your response.
Practice regularly by writing essays on different topics. Use timers to simulate exam conditions. Get feedback from teachers or peers, and use online resources like English AIdol to improve your writing skills.
The word count requirement for IELTS Writing Task 2 is at least 250 words. Writing fewer than 250 words can result in a lower score for Task Response.
Plan your time carefully. Spend about 5 minutes planning your essay, 35 minutes writing, and 5 minutes proofreading. Stick to your plan to ensure you complete the task within the given time.
| Label | Value | Source | |--------|-------|--------| | Average score for IELTS Writing Task 2 | 5.5 | Cambridge Assessment English | | Percentage of test-takers achieving Band 7.0 or higher | 30% | ETS | | Common vocabulary range for Band 7.0 responses | 1,500-2,500 words | Cambridge Assessment English |
[Empty array for non-how-to pages]