English guide
Get a Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 obesity sample answer with detailed scoring breakdown, vocabulary list, and common mistakes to avoid
What this guide covers
Search answer
Get a Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 obesity sample answer with detailed scoring breakdown, vocabulary list, and common mistakes to avoid
Related guides:
Some people believe that increasing taxes on unhealthy foods like sugar and fat is the best way to tackle obesity. Others argue that providing more information about the benefits of healthy eating would be more effective. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Obesity is a big problem in many countries. Some people think that we should tax unhealthy food to solve this problem. Others believe that giving more information about healthy food is better. I think both ideas have good points.
Taxing unhealthy food can help people eat less of it. When food is expensive, people buy less. This can make people healthier. Also, the money from the tax can be used for hospitals and schools. But some people say that taxing food is not fair. Poor people might not be able to afford healthy food if unhealthy food is too expensive.
Giving more information about healthy food can also help. If people know about the benefits of healthy food, they might eat more of it. Schools and TV can teach people about healthy eating. But some people might not listen to this information. They might still eat unhealthy food because it tastes good.
In my opinion, both ideas can work together. Taxing unhealthy food can make it less popular, and giving information can help people make better choices. Governments should try both ways to solve the problem of obesity.
Task Response (TR): 5.0 - Presents a position but with limited development. Both views are mentioned but not sufficiently explored. Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 6.0 - Ideas are logically organized but with some repetition and lack of clear progression. Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 - Uses some less common vocabulary but with some errors in word choice. Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms but with frequent grammatical errors.
The escalating issue of obesity has become a global concern, with various strategies proposed to address it. While some advocate for higher taxation on unhealthy foods as an effective solution, others contend that promoting healthy eating through education is more beneficial. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting my view.
Proponents of taxing unhealthy foods argue that financial disincentives can curb consumption. Higher prices make these items less accessible, particularly for price-sensitive consumers. Additionally, revenue generated from such taxes could fund public health initiatives. For instance, countries like Hungary and Mexico have implemented similar measures with observable reductions in junk food purchases. However, critics point out that low-income individuals may disproportionately bear the burden, as they often have fewer resources to afford healthier alternatives.
Conversely, those who favor education-based approaches emphasize the power of information. When individuals understand the long-term health consequences of poor diet, they may make better choices. Campaigns and school programs can disseminate this knowledge effectively. For example, the UK's Change4Life initiative has successfully raised awareness about healthy eating habits. Nevertheless, skepticism exists regarding the impact of such campaigns, as behavioral change requires more than just information.
In my view, a combination of both strategies would yield the most effective results. Taxation can create an immediate deterrent for unhealthy food consumption, while education empowers individuals to make informed, long-term choices. Governments should implement these measures in tandem to tackle obesity comprehensively.
Task Response (TR): 7.0 - Presents a clear position throughout and extends and supports ideas, though some points could be further developed. Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 7.0 - Uses cohesive devices effectively, though there are occasional lapses in logical progression. Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 - Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey ideas precisely, though with some less precise word choices. Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with generally good control, though with some errors.
The prevalence of obesity has reached alarming levels worldwide, prompting debates on the most effective interventions. While some campaign for increased taxation on unhealthy foods, others champion educational initiatives as the preferable solution. This essay will analyze both approaches before advocating for an integrated strategy.
Advocates for taxing unhealthy foods posit that financial penalties can significantly reduce consumption. By raising prices, governments can discourage purchases of junk food, particularly among price-conscious consumers. Moreover, the revenue generated can be channeled into public health programs. For example, Denmark's tax on saturated fats led to a notable decrease in consumption of fatty foods. Nonetheless, opponents argue that such taxes may disproportionately affect lower-income households, exacerbating social inequalities.
In contrast, proponents of education-based strategies highlight the transformative power of knowledge. When individuals are informed about the health risks associated with poor dietary choices, they are more likely to adopt healthier habits. Public awareness campaigns and school curricula can play pivotal roles in this regard. The success of programs like Australia's 'Go for 2&5' campaign, which promotes fruit and vegetable consumption, underscores this potential. However, critics contend that education alone may not suffice, as behavioral change often requires more than just information.
In my opinion, the most effective approach to combating obesity lies in the synergy of both strategies. Taxation can create an immediate disincentive for unhealthy food consumption, while education equips individuals with the knowledge to make sustainable lifestyle changes. By implementing these measures concurrently, governments can mount a comprehensive assault on the obesity epidemic.
Task Response (TR): 8.0 - Presents a clear position throughout and extends and supports ideas with relevant examples. Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 8.0 - Uses cohesive devices skilfully to guide the reader, with a clear logical progression throughout. Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 - Uses a wide range of vocabulary precisely and naturally, with only minor errors. Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 - Uses a wide range of complex sentence forms with generally good control, though with some errors.
Practice makes perfect. Submit your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response on English AIdol and get instant AI scoring and feedback to help you reach your target band score.
Q: How is the IELTS Writing Task 2 scored?
A: The IELTS Writing Task 2 is scored based on four criteria: Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. Each criterion is scored from 1 to 9, and the average of these scores determines your final band score.
Q: What is the difference between Band 6.0 and Band 7.0 in IELTS Writing Task 2?
A: A Band 6.0 response presents a position but with limited development and some repetition. A Band 7.0 response presents a clear position throughout and extends and supports ideas, though some points could be further developed.
Q: How can I improve my vocabulary for IELTS Writing Task 2?
A: Expand your vocabulary by reading a variety of texts, including academic articles, newspapers, and books. Use flashcards to learn new words and practice using them in sentences. Additionally, familiarize yourself with academic vocabulary and collocations.
Q: What are some common topics for IELTS Writing Task 2?
A: Common topics include education, technology, health, environment, society, and global issues. Practice writing essays on a variety of topics to prepare for the test.
Q: How long should my IELTS Writing Task 2 response be?
A: Your response should be at least 250 words. Aim for around 280-300 words to ensure you cover all aspects of the task thoroughly.
Q: Can I use personal examples in my IELTS Writing Task 2 response?
A: While personal examples can be used, it is generally better to use factual examples from real-world situations, such as statistics, studies, or news events. This adds credibility to your argument.
Q: How can I improve my coherence and cohesion in IELTS Writing Task 2?
A: Use a variety of cohesive devices, such as linking words and phrases, to connect your ideas logically. Ensure each paragraph has a clear topic sentence and that your ideas flow smoothly from one paragraph to the next.
Q: What should I do if I don't know much about the topic in IELTS Writing Task 2?
A: Even if you are not familiar with the topic, you can still write a good response by focusing on the task requirements. Use general knowledge and common sense to discuss the topic, and support your points with relevant examples.
Q: How can I manage my time effectively in IELTS Writing Task 2?
A: Spend about 40 minutes on Writing Task 2. Allocate time for planning, writing, and reviewing your response. Practice timed writing exercises to improve your time management skills.