IELTS Writing Task 2: Natural Disasters (Agree Disagree) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers
Related guides:
The Prompt
Some people believe that governments should invest in preventing natural disasters, while others argue that money should be spent on other priorities. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Model Answers
Band 6.0 Answer
The government should spend money on preventing natural disasters because they can cause a lot of damage. For example, hurricanes and earthquakes can destroy homes and kill people. If the government spends money on better warning systems and stronger buildings, fewer people will die and less damage will happen. However, some people say that money should be spent on other things like education or healthcare. They believe that natural disasters are rare and unpredictable, so it is better to spend money on things that help people every day. In my opinion, preventing natural disasters is more important because when they happen, the damage is very big and affects many people.
Scoring Breakdown
- Task Response (TR): Presents a position but with limited development of arguments.
- Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized but with some repetition and lack of clear progression.
- Lexical Resource (LR): Uses some appropriate vocabulary but with errors and limited range.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Contains frequent grammatical errors that sometimes impede communication.
Band 7.0 Answer
Natural disasters have become more frequent and severe due to climate change, making disaster prevention a pressing global issue. Proponents of investing in disaster prevention argue that proactive measures can significantly reduce human and economic losses. For instance, early warning systems and improved infrastructure can save lives during earthquakes and hurricanes. On the other hand, critics contend that allocating funds to other sectors like healthcare and education is more beneficial. They argue that natural disasters are unpredictable, and investing in prevention may not guarantee safety. In my view, while both perspectives have merit, prioritizing disaster prevention is crucial for long-term sustainability and public safety.
Scoring Breakdown
- Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with some development of arguments and counterarguments.
- Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and appropriate use of cohesive devices.
- Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a mix of appropriate vocabulary with some less common lexical items and occasional errors.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Contains some grammatical errors but generally maintains accuracy and variety.
Band 8.0 Answer
The debate over whether governments should prioritize natural disaster prevention or other sectors is multifaceted. Advocates for disaster prevention highlight the catastrophic impact of natural disasters, such as the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, which caused immense loss of life and property. Investing in robust infrastructure, advanced warning systems, and community preparedness can mitigate these risks. Conversely, opponents argue that resources should be directed towards education, healthcare, and economic development, which have more immediate and widespread benefits. They contend that natural disasters are unpredictable and that prevention efforts may not always be effective. In my opinion, a balanced approach is necessary, but given the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters due to climate change, governments should allocate more resources to disaster prevention to ensure public safety and resilience.
Scoring Breakdown
- Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with thorough development of arguments and counterarguments.
- Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices.
- Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a wide range of appropriate vocabulary with some less common lexical items and minimal errors.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Contains few grammatical errors and demonstrates a good range of sentence structures.
Band 9.0 Answer
The escalating frequency and intensity of natural disasters, exacerbated by climate change, have sparked a contentious debate regarding governmental priorities. Proponents of disaster prevention advocate for substantial investments in mitigation strategies, citing the cataclysmic consequences of recent events such as Hurricane Katrina and the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. These disasters not only resulted in significant loss of life but also inflicted long-term economic and social repercussions. By enhancing early warning systems, fortifying infrastructure, and implementing comprehensive disaster management plans, governments can substantially reduce the human and economic toll of such events. Conversely, detractors argue that allocating resources to sectors like healthcare, education, and economic development yields more immediate and far-reaching benefits. They posit that natural disasters are inherently unpredictable, and thus, prevention efforts may not always be effective. Furthermore, they contend that investing in other areas can enhance overall societal resilience and preparedness. In my view, while both perspectives offer valid points, the increasing prevalence and severity of natural disasters necessitate a paradigm shift towards prioritizing disaster prevention. This approach not only safeguards lives and property but also fosters long-term sustainability and economic stability.
Scoring Breakdown
- Task Response (TR): Presents a clear, insightful position with thorough development of arguments and counterarguments, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of the topic.
- Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices, resulting in a cohesive and fluent response.
- Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a wide range of appropriate vocabulary with precise and sophisticated lexical items, demonstrating a high level of lexical resource.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Contains few grammatical errors and demonstrates a high degree of accuracy and a wide range of sentence structures.
Vocabulary Highlights
- Cataclysmic: Adjective. Extremely destructive or disastrous. Example: The cataclysmic impact of the earthquake left the city in ruins.
- Mitigation: Noun. The action of reducing the severity of something. Example: Mitigation strategies include early warning systems and robust infrastructure.
- Exacerbated: Verb. To make a problem, bad situation, or negative feeling worse. Example: Climate change has exacerbated the frequency and intensity of natural disasters.
- Fortifying: Verb. To strengthen or secure something. Example: Fortifying infrastructure can reduce the impact of natural disasters.
- Repercussions: Noun. An unintended consequence of an event or action, especially an unwelcome one. Example: The economic repercussions of the tsunami were felt for years.
- Paradigm shift: Noun. A fundamental change in approach or underlying assumptions. Example: The increasing frequency of natural disasters necessitates a paradigm shift in governmental priorities.
- Resilience: Noun. The ability to withstand or recover quickly from difficult conditions. Example: Enhancing societal resilience is crucial for disaster preparedness.
- Proponents: Noun. A person who advocates for a cause or proposal. Example: Proponents of disaster prevention argue for substantial investments in mitigation strategies.
- Detractors: Noun. A person who disparages or belittles someone or something. Example: Detractors argue that prevention efforts may not always be effective.
- Sustainability: Noun. The ability to be maintained at a certain rate or level without depleting natural resources. Example: Prioritizing disaster prevention fosters long-term sustainability.
- Robust: Adjective. Strong and sturdy in construction. Example: Robust infrastructure can withstand the impact of natural disasters.
- Comprehensive: Adjective. Including or dealing with all or nearly all aspects of something. Example: A comprehensive disaster management plan includes early warning systems and community preparedness.
- Immediate: Adjective. Occurring or done at once; instant. Example: Investing in healthcare yields immediate benefits for public health.
- Widespread: Adjective. Found or distributed over a large area or among a large number of people. Example: Economic development has widespread benefits for society.
- Allocate: Verb. To distribute something as it is required or desired. Example: Governments should allocate more resources to disaster prevention.
Common Mistakes Students Make
- Lack of Clear Position: Failing to present a clear stance on the issue, leading to a vague or unclear response.
- Insufficient Development of Arguments: Providing only superficial arguments without sufficient explanation or examples.
- Poor Coherence and Cohesion: Using ineffective transitions and failing to organize ideas logically, resulting in a disjointed response.
- Limited Vocabulary: Using a narrow range of vocabulary, which can make the response seem repetitive and less sophisticated.
- Grammatical Errors: Making frequent grammatical mistakes that impede communication and reduce the overall quality of the response.
Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol
Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 responses scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your score.
