IELTS Writing Task 2: Multinational Companies (Positive Negative) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

• IELTS Writing Task 2: Social Media Influencers - Band 7.0…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Road Safety – Band 8.0 Sample with…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Traffic Congestion - Band 6.5 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Juvenile Justice – Band 8.0 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Rehabilitation: Band 9.0 Sample Answer

The Prompt

Some people argue that multinational companies are good for a country's economy, while others contend that they have more negative than positive impacts. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6 Answer

The multinational companies are beneficial for a country. First, they bring more money to the country. Second, they help people get jobs. However, some people think they are bad. They say the multinational companies make local businesses close. Also, they pollute the environment. In my opinion, I think the good things are more than the bad things.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (6.0): Presents a position but with unclear development and limited supporting ideas.
• Coherence & Cohesion (6.0): Logical order but with some sequencing issues and frequent cohesive devices.
• Lexical Resource (5.5): Limited vocabulary with some errors and repetition.
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (5.5): Simple sentence forms with frequent errors.

Band 7 Answer

Multinational corporations (MNCs) play a significant role in economic development, but their impact is not solely positive. On the one hand, MNCs contribute to economic growth by generating employment opportunities and investing in infrastructure. For instance, companies like Apple and Samsung employ thousands of workers globally, boosting local economies. On the other hand, MNCs can exploit local resources and labor, often leading to environmental degradation and poor working conditions. For example, mining companies have been criticized for their environmental practices. In my view, while the benefits of MNCs are evident, their negative impacts must be regulated to ensure sustainable development.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (7.0): Presents a clear position with relevant examples and some extended ideas.
• Coherence & Cohesion (7.0): Logical order with clear cohesive devices but some sequencing issues.
• Lexical Resource (7.0): Adequate vocabulary with some less common lexical items but occasional errors.
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (7.0): Mix of simple and complex sentence forms with frequent errors.

Band 8 Answer

The proliferation of multinational corporations (MNCs) has sparked debate regarding their economic and social impacts. Proponents argue that MNCs drive economic growth by injecting capital, creating jobs, and fostering technological advancements. For example, technology giants like Google and Microsoft have revolutionized industries and created millions of jobs worldwide. Conversely, critics point out that MNCs can perpetuate economic inequality and exploit local labor forces. For instance, fast-fashion brands have been accused of paying workers substandard wages. In my opinion, while the benefits of MNCs are substantial, it is imperative to implement stringent regulations to mitigate their negative consequences.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (8.0): Presents a clear position with relevant, extended examples and developed ideas.
• Coherence & Cohesion (8.0): Logical order with clear cohesive devices and effective paragraphing.
• Lexical Resource (8.0): Sophisticated vocabulary with a mix of less common and idiomatic expressions.
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (8.0): Mix of simple and complex sentence forms with occasional errors.

Band 9 Answer

The role of multinational corporations (MNCs) in global economies has been a contentious issue, with proponents highlighting their economic benefits and detractors emphasizing their detrimental effects. Advocates contend that MNCs stimulate economic growth by infusing capital, generating employment, and fostering innovation. For instance, pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer have played a pivotal role in advancing medical research, leading to groundbreaking treatments. Conversely, critics argue that MNCs often exploit local resources, perpetuate economic inequality, and contribute to environmental degradation. For example, oil companies have been criticized for their environmental practices, particularly in developing nations. In my view, while the economic advantages of MNCs are undeniable, their negative impacts necessitate robust regulatory frameworks to ensure equitable and sustainable development.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (9.0): Presents a clear position with relevant, extended examples and fully developed ideas.
• Coherence & Cohesion (9.0): Logical order with clear cohesive devices and effective paragraphing.
• Lexical Resource (9.0): Sophisticated vocabulary with a mix of less common and idiomatic expressions, precise and natural collocations.
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (9.0): Mix of simple and complex sentence forms with occasional errors, precise and varied sentence structures.

Vocabulary Highlights

| Word/Expression | Definition | Example Collocation | |-----------------|-------------|-------------------| | Proliferation | Rapid increase or spread | Proliferation of multinational corporations | | Contiguous | Sharing a common border; touching | Contiguous countries | | Infuse | Introduce or instill something | Infuse capital into the economy | | Imperative | Essential or urgent | Imperative to implement regulations | | Mitigate | Make less severe or serious | Mitigate negative consequences | | Stingent | Strict or severe | Stingent regulations | | Perpetuate | Make something continue indefinitely | Perpetuate economic inequality | | Advocates | People who publicly support or recommend a particular cause or policy | Advocates of free trade | | Detractors | People who criticize or speak out against something | Detractors of global corporations | | Infuse | Introduce or instill something | Infuse capital into the economy | | Robust | Strong and healthy; vigorous | Robust regulatory frameworks | | Exploit | Make use of selfishly or unethically | Exploit local labor forces | | Equitable | Fair and impartial | Equitable development | | Sustainable | Able to be maintained at a certain level | Sustainable development | | Groundbreaking | Innovative; revolutionary | Groundbreaking treatments | | Capital | Wealth in the form of money or other assets | Capital investment | | Employment | The state of having paid work | Generate employment opportunities | | Technological | Relating to technology | Technological advancements | | Advancing | Moving forward or progressing | Advancing medical research | | Infuse | Introduce or instill something | Infuse capital into the economy | | Stingent | Strict or severe | Stingent regulations | | Perpetuate | Make something continue indefinitely | Perpetuate economic inequality | | Advocates | People who publicly support or recommend a particular cause or policy | Advocates of free trade | | Detractors | People who criticize or speak out against something | Detractors of global corporations |

Common Mistakes

1. Lack of Clear Position: Some students fail to present a clear opinion, making the response vague and less coherent.
2. Overgeneralization: Using broad statements without specific examples weakens the argument.
3. Repetition: Repeating the same words or phrases can make the response monotonous.
4. Poor Paragraphing: Inadequate paragraphing can make the response difficult to follow.
5. Grammatical Errors: Frequent grammatical mistakes can lower the overall score.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 responses scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your score.