AI-powered learning English

English guide

IELTS Writing Task 2:
Multinational Companies - Band 7.5 Sample with Full Breakdown

Get a Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer on multinational companies with full scoring breakdown and expert analysis.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Multinational Companies - Band 7.5 Sample with Full Breakdown | English AIdol Blog

What this guide covers

Search answer

What this page helps you decide

Get a Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer on multinational companies with full scoring breakdown and expert analysis.

Focus Quick answer
Includes 2026 update
Best for Practical checklist
Next step Related practice
  1. Scan the direct answer first.
  2. Check examples or score rules.
  3. Open the related practice page.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Multinational Companies - Band 7.5 Sample with Full Breakdown

Related guides:

Prompt

Some people think that multinational companies are beneficial to the countries in which they operate. Others argue that they are detrimental. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

Scoring Breakdown

  • Task Response (TR): 5.0 - Presents a position but with limited development
  • Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 5.5 - Some sequencing but limited use of cohesive devices
  • Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 - Attempts to use a mix of vocabulary but with some errors
  • Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 - Attempts complex sentences but with frequent errors

Answer:

Multinational companies are very common nowadays. Some people say they are good for countries. Others say they are bad. I think they can be both good and bad.

On one hand, multinational companies bring jobs and money. They can help the economy grow. For example, a company like Apple can create many jobs in a country. This is good for people who need work. Also, these companies pay taxes. This money can be used for schools and hospitals.

On the other hand, multinational companies can be bad. They can take advantage of workers. Sometimes they pay low wages. They can also pollute the environment. For example, a factory might dump waste into a river. This can make people sick.

In conclusion, multinational companies can be good and bad. It depends on how they are managed. Governments should make rules to control them. This way, they can be more beneficial.

Band 7.0 Answer

Scoring Breakdown

  • Task Response (TR): 6.5 - Presents a clear position with some development
  • Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 6.5 - Uses cohesive devices but with some sequencing issues
  • Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 - Uses a mix of vocabulary with some less common items
  • Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with some errors

Answer:

The presence of multinational companies in various countries has sparked considerable debate. While some argue that these corporations bring numerous benefits, others contend that they cause more harm than good. I firmly believe that the positive aspects outweigh the negative ones.

Proponents of multinational companies argue that they contribute significantly to economic growth. Firstly, they create job opportunities for local residents. For instance, a multinational company like Samsung can employ thousands of people in a single country. Secondly, these companies often bring advanced technology and expertise, which can enhance the local workforce's skills. Moreover, they pay taxes, which can be used to fund public services such as education and healthcare.

However, critics point out that multinational companies can exploit local resources and workers. They might pay low wages and offer poor working conditions. Additionally, these companies can cause environmental degradation. For example, a multinational corporation might dump hazardous waste into a river, polluting the water supply and harming local ecosystems.

In my opinion, the benefits of multinational companies outweigh the drawbacks. Governments should implement strict regulations to ensure that these corporations operate responsibly. By doing so, they can maximize the advantages and minimize the disadvantages.

Band 7.5 Answer

Scoring Breakdown

  • Task Response (TR): 7.0 - Presents a clear position with logical development
  • Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 7.5 - Uses a mix of cohesive devices effectively
  • Lexical Resource (LR): 7.5 - Uses a range of vocabulary with some less common items
  • Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 7.5 - Uses a mix of complex and simple sentences with some errors

Answer:

The proliferation of multinational companies has become a contentious issue, with proponents highlighting their economic benefits and detractors emphasizing their detrimental effects. I contend that, while these corporations have certain drawbacks, their overall impact is largely positive.

Advocates of multinational companies argue that they stimulate economic growth in several ways. Firstly, they generate employment opportunities for local residents. For example, a multinational corporation like Toyota can employ thousands of people in a single country, thereby reducing unemployment rates. Secondly, these companies often introduce advanced technology and expertise, which can enhance the local workforce's skills. Moreover, they contribute to the local economy through taxes, which can be used to fund public services such as education and healthcare.

However, critics contend that multinational companies can exploit local resources and workers. They might pay low wages and offer poor working conditions, thereby perpetuating poverty and inequality. Additionally, these companies can cause environmental degradation. For instance, a multinational corporation might dump hazardous waste into a river, polluting the water supply and harming local ecosystems.

In my view, the benefits of multinational companies outweigh the drawbacks. Governments should implement stringent regulations to ensure that these corporations operate responsibly. By doing so, they can maximize the advantages and minimize the disadvantages. For example, they can enforce strict labor laws to protect workers and implement environmental regulations to prevent pollution.

Band 8.0 Answer

Scoring Breakdown

  • Task Response (TR): 8.0 - Presents a clear position with thorough development
  • Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 8.0 - Uses a mix of cohesive devices effectively
  • Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 - Uses a range of vocabulary with some sophisticated items
  • Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 - Uses a mix of complex and simple sentences with few errors

Answer:

The ubiquity of multinational companies has sparked a heated debate, with proponents lauding their economic benefits and detractors decrying their detrimental effects. I firmly believe that, while these corporations have certain drawbacks, their overall impact is largely positive.

Proponents of multinational companies argue that they stimulate economic growth in numerous ways. Firstly, they generate employment opportunities for local residents. For example, a multinational corporation like Microsoft can employ thousands of people in a single country, thereby reducing unemployment rates. Secondly, these companies often introduce cutting-edge technology and expertise, which can enhance the local workforce's skills. Moreover, they contribute to the local economy through taxes, which can be used to fund public services such as education and healthcare.

However, critics contend that multinational companies can exploit local resources and workers. They might pay low wages and offer poor working conditions, thereby perpetuating poverty and inequality. Additionally, these companies can cause environmental degradation. For instance, a multinational corporation might dump hazardous waste into a river, polluting the water supply and harming local ecosystems.

In my view, the benefits of multinational companies outweigh the drawbacks. Governments should implement stringent regulations to ensure that these corporations operate responsibly. By doing so, they can maximize the advantages and minimize the disadvantages. For example, they can enforce strict labor laws to protect workers and implement environmental regulations to prevent pollution. Furthermore, they can encourage multinational companies to engage in corporate social responsibility initiatives, such as funding local schools or hospitals.

Vocabulary Highlights

  1. Proliferation (noun) - rapid increase in the number or amount of something: The proliferation of smartphones has changed the way we communicate.
  2. Contentious (adjective) - causing or likely to cause an argument; controversial: The issue of immigration is highly contentious in many countries.
  3. Stimulate (verb) - to encourage something to grow, develop, or become active: The government's policies aim to stimulate economic growth.
  4. Ubiquity (noun) - the fact of being everywhere, especially at the same time; omnipresence: The ubiquity of social media has changed the way we interact with each other.
  5. Cutting-edge (adjective) - using or incorporating the latest technology or developments: The company is known for its cutting-edge research in the field of renewable energy.
  6. Perpetuate (verb) - to make something continue indefinitely; to prolong the existence of something: The government's policies are perpetuating poverty and inequality.
  7. Decry (verb) - to criticize something strongly and publicly: The government has been widely decrying the company's environmental practices.
  8. Laud (verb) - to praise someone or something highly, especially in public: The government has been widely lauding the company's economic contributions.
  9. Stringent (adjective) - strict, precise, and exacting: The government has implemented stringent regulations to protect the environment.
  10. Enforce (verb) - to make sure that something happens or is done: The government is enforcing strict labor laws to protect workers.
  11. Corporate Social Responsibility (noun) - the idea that businesses should balance profit-making activities with activities that benefit society: The company is engaged in various corporate social responsibility initiatives, such as funding local schools and hospitals.
  12. Hazardous (adjective) - dangerous to people or the environment: The company has been dumping hazardous waste into the river, causing environmental degradation.
  13. Expertise (noun) - expert skill or knowledge in a particular field: The company is known for its expertise in the field of renewable energy.
  14. Contribute (verb) - to give something, especially money, in order to help achieve or provide something: The company contributes to the local economy through taxes, which can be used to fund public services such as education and healthcare.
  15. Degradation (noun) - the process of becoming worse or lower in quality, value, or importance: The company's environmental practices have caused significant degradation of the local ecosystem.
  16. Implement (verb) - to put something into effect; to start to do or use something: The government is implementing strict environmental regulations to prevent pollution.
  17. Enhance (verb) - to increase or improve something, especially a quality, ability, or piece of equipment: The company's advanced technology is enhancing the local workforce's skills.
  18. Perpetuate (verb) - to make something continue indefinitely; to prolong the existence of something: The government's policies are perpetuating poverty and inequality.
  19. Ubiquity (noun) - the fact of being everywhere, especially at the same time; omnipresence: The ubiquity of social media has changed the way we interact with each other.
  20. Stringent (adjective) - strict, precise, and exacting: The government has implemented stringent regulations to protect the environment.

Common Mistakes

  1. Lack of Clear Position: Many students fail to present a clear position in their response. It is essential to state your opinion explicitly and support it with relevant arguments.
  2. Inadequate Development of Arguments: Some students present a clear position but fail to develop their arguments adequately. Each argument should be supported with examples and explanations.
  3. Poor Use of Cohesive Devices: Many students struggle with using cohesive devices effectively. This can make the response difficult to follow and understand.
  4. Limited Vocabulary: Some students use a limited range of vocabulary, which can make the response repetitive and less engaging. It is important to use a variety of vocabulary to express your ideas effectively.
  5. Grammatical Errors: Many students make grammatical errors, which can affect the overall quality of the response. It is essential to proofread your work carefully to minimize errors.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect! Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to help you improve your score.