AI-powered learning English

English guide

IELTS Writing Task 2:
Multinational Companies - Band 7.0 Sample with Full Breakdown

Get a Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer about multinational companies with full scoring breakdown and expert analysis. Ace your test prep today.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Multinational Companies - Band 7.0 Sample with Full Breakdown | English AIdol Blog

What this guide covers

Search answer

What this page helps you decide

Get a Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer about multinational companies with full scoring breakdown and expert analysis. Ace your test prep today.

Focus Quick answer
Includes 2026 update
Best for Practical checklist
Next step Related practice
  1. Scan the direct answer first.
  2. Check examples or score rules.
  3. Open the related practice page.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Multinational Companies - Band 7.0 Sample with Full Breakdown

Related guides:

The Prompt

Many people believe that multinational companies are beneficial to the countries where they operate. Others, however, disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

Task Response: The answer presents a position but lacks development. The arguments are simplistic and not fully extended. Coherence and Cohesion: The ideas are organized but with some repetition and lack of clear progression. Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is limited and sometimes inappropriate. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The grammar is mostly simple with frequent errors.

Multinational companies are very common in the world today. Some people think they are good for the countries where they operate. I agree with this view.

Firstly, multinational companies bring jobs to the local people. For example, a company like Coca-Cola needs many workers to make and sell its products. This is good because it reduces unemployment. Secondly, these companies pay taxes to the government. The government can use this money to build schools and hospitals. This helps the country develop.

However, some people disagree. They say that multinational companies exploit workers. They pay low wages and make workers do overtime. This is true in some cases, but not all. Companies like Apple and Microsoft treat their workers well and pay good salaries.

In conclusion, I believe that multinational companies are beneficial to the countries where they operate. They create jobs and contribute to the economy. The negative aspects are not as significant as the positive ones.

Band 7.0 Answer

Task Response: The answer presents a clear position with some development. The arguments are extended and supported with examples. Coherence and Cohesion: The ideas are organized logically with clear progression. Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is sufficient for the task with some less common lexical items. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The grammar is varied with some complex sentence forms and frequent but not persistent errors.

The role of multinational companies in today's globalized world is a contentious issue. While some argue that these corporations bring economic benefits to host countries, others contend that they exploit local resources and labor. I firmly believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

On the one hand, multinational companies contribute significantly to the economic growth of host countries. They create employment opportunities for local people, which helps to reduce unemployment rates. For instance, companies like Samsung and Toyota have established manufacturing plants in various countries, providing jobs to thousands of locals. Moreover, these corporations pay taxes to the host governments, which can be used to fund public services such as education and healthcare. Additionally, multinational companies often introduce advanced technology and management practices, which can enhance the productivity and competitiveness of local industries.

On the other hand, critics argue that multinational companies exploit local resources and labor. They point out that these corporations often pay low wages to local workers and extract natural resources without adequate compensation. For example, some mining companies have been accused of causing environmental degradation and displacing local communities. Furthermore, the profits generated by these companies often flow back to their home countries, depriving host countries of potential economic benefits.

In my view, the positive impacts of multinational companies outweigh the negative ones. While it is true that some corporations may engage in unethical practices, many others operate responsibly and contribute positively to the host countries. Governments should enact and enforce regulations to prevent exploitation and ensure that multinational companies operate in a manner that benefits both the corporations and the host countries.

Band 8.0 Answer

Task Response: The answer presents a clear position with thorough development. The arguments are extended, supported, and illustrated with relevant examples. Coherence and Cohesion: The ideas are organized logically with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices. Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is varied and precise, with a good range of less common lexical items. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The grammar is varied and flexible with complex sentence forms and minimal errors.

The proliferation of multinational corporations in the contemporary global economy has sparked intense debate regarding their impact on host countries. Proponents argue that these entities foster economic development, while detractors contend that they perpetuate exploitation. I am inclined to support the former perspective, as the benefits of multinational companies are manifold and well-documented.

Proponents of multinational companies assert that these entities stimulate economic growth and development in host countries. Firstly, they create employment opportunities for local populations, thereby reducing unemployment rates and alleviating poverty. For example, companies like Microsoft and IBM have established research and development centers in various countries, providing high-skilled jobs to local professionals. Secondly, multinational corporations pay taxes to host governments, which can be used to fund public services and infrastructure projects. Moreover, these companies often transfer technology and management expertise to local firms, enhancing their productivity and competitiveness. Lastly, multinational companies facilitate cultural exchange and understanding, promoting global integration and cooperation.

However, critics argue that multinational companies exploit local resources and labor. They contend that these corporations pay low wages to local workers and extract natural resources without adequate compensation. For instance, some oil companies have been accused of causing environmental pollution and displacing local communities. Furthermore, the profits generated by these companies often flow back to their home countries, depriving host countries of potential economic benefits. Additionally, multinational corporations may undermine local cultures and traditions, imposing foreign values and practices on host societies.

In my view, the positive impacts of multinational companies outweigh the negative ones. While it is true that some corporations may engage in unethical practices, many others operate responsibly and contribute positively to the host countries. Governments should enact and enforce regulations to prevent exploitation and ensure that multinational companies operate in a manner that benefits both the corporations and the host countries. Furthermore, host countries should strive to attract high-quality foreign investment and negotiate favorable terms with multinational companies to maximize the benefits and minimize the costs.

Vocabulary Highlights

  1. Contentious (adjective): causing or likely to cause disagreement or argument. Example: The role of multinational companies is a contentious issue.
  2. Exploit (verb): make full use of and derive benefit from (a resource). Example: Critics argue that multinational companies exploit local resources.
  3. Enact (verb): make (a bill or other proposal) law. Example: Governments should enact regulations to prevent exploitation.
  4. Proponent (noun): a person who advocates a theory, proposal, or course of action. Example: Proponents of multinational companies assert that they foster economic growth.
  5. Detractor (noun): a person who disparages someone or something. Example: Detractors contend that multinational companies perpetuate exploitation.
  6. Allevate (verb): make (suffering, deficiency, or a problem) less severe. Example: Multinational companies alleviate poverty by creating employment opportunities.
  7. Facilitate (verb): make (an action or process) easy or easier. Example: Multinational companies facilitate cultural exchange and understanding.
  8. Undermine (verb): lessen the effectiveness, power, or ability of, especially gradually or insidiously. Example: Multinational companies may undermine local cultures and traditions.
  9. Negotiate (verb): obtain or bring about by discussion and agreement. Example: Host countries should negotiate favorable terms with multinational companies.
  10. Proliferation (noun): rapid increase in the number or amount of something. Example: The proliferation of multinational corporations has sparked intense debate.
  11. Deprave (verb): make morally corrupt or pervert. Example: Multinational companies may deprave local cultures and traditions.
  12. Stimulate (verb): encourage or arouse interest or activity in. Example: Multinational companies stimulate economic growth and development.
  13. Transfer (verb): move (something) from one place to another. Example: Multinational companies transfer technology and management expertise to local firms.
  14. Enhance (verb): increase or improve in value, quality, or extent. Example: Technology transfer enhances the productivity and competitiveness of local industries.
  15. Integrate (verb): combine (one thing) with another to form a whole. Example: Multinational companies promote global integration and cooperation.
  16. Extract (verb): obtain (something) from a specified source. Example: Multinational companies extract natural resources from host countries.
  17. Deprive (verb): prevent (a person or place) from having or using something. Example: Multinational companies deprive host countries of potential economic benefits.
  18. Allegation (noun): a claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong, typically one that is not proven. Example: Some mining companies have been accused of causing environmental degradation and displacing local communities.
  19. Compensation (noun): something, typically money, awarded to someone in recognition of loss, suffering, or injury. Example: Multinational companies should compensate local communities for the extraction of natural resources.
  20. Enforce (verb): cause (something) to happen imperatively. Example: Governments should enforce regulations to prevent exploitation by multinational companies.

Common Mistakes

  1. Lack of Clear Position: Some students fail to present a clear position on the issue, making their arguments weak and unfocused.
  2. Inadequate Development of Arguments: Students often present simplistic arguments without sufficient development or support.
  3. Poor Organization: Some responses lack clear organization and logical progression, making them difficult to follow.
  4. Limited Vocabulary: Students may use limited vocabulary, repeating the same words and phrases throughout the response.
  5. Grammatical Errors: Frequent grammatical errors can detract from the overall quality of the response, making it difficult to understand.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to help you improve your score.