AI-powered learning English

English guide

IELTS Writing Task 2:
Minimum Wage (Two Part Question) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Get Band 9 IELTS Writing Task 2 model answers for minimum wage two-part questions. Expert analysis, vocabulary, and scoring breakdowns.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Minimum Wage (Two Part Question) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers | English AIdol Blog

What this guide covers

Search answer

What this page helps you decide

Get Band 9 IELTS Writing Task 2 model answers for minimum wage two-part questions. Expert analysis, vocabulary, and scoring breakdowns.

Focus Quick answer
Includes 2026 update
Best for Practical checklist
Next step Related practice
  1. Scan the direct answer first.
  2. Check examples or score rules.
  3. Open the related practice page.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Minimum Wage (Two Part Question) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

The Prompt

IELTS Writing Task 2 Prompt (Paraphrased):

Some governments believe that increasing the minimum wage will reduce poverty and improve living standards. Others argue that it will lead to job losses and economic instability. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

The minimum wage is a controversial topic. Some people think it helps poor people, while others think it causes job losses. I agree with the first view.

Firstly, increasing the minimum wage can reduce poverty. When workers earn more, they can afford better housing, food, and education. This improves their quality of life. For example, in countries like Germany, the minimum wage has helped many people escape poverty. Secondly, it can boost the economy. When people have more money, they spend more, which helps businesses grow. This creates a positive cycle of economic growth.**

However, some people argue that increasing the minimum wage causes job losses. Employers may reduce their workforce to save money. This is a valid concern, but it is not always true. In many cases, businesses can afford to pay higher wages without laying off workers. In conclusion, I believe that increasing the minimum wage is beneficial. It helps poor people and boosts the economy. Governments should consider this carefully.

Scoring Breakdown

  • Task Response (TR): 5.0 - Presents a position but lacks development and clarity.
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 6.0 - Ideas are logically organized but with some repetition and lack of clear progression.
  • Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 - Uses some appropriate vocabulary but with errors and limited range.
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with frequent errors.

Band 7.0 Answer

The debate over minimum wage is complex, with valid arguments on both sides. While some contend that raising the minimum wage alleviates poverty, others warn of potential economic repercussions. I lean towards the former perspective.

Proponents of higher minimum wages argue convincingly that this measure can significantly reduce poverty. When wages increase, low-income individuals can better meet their basic needs, leading to improved living standards. For instance, studies from the United States have shown that minimum wage hikes have lifted many families out of poverty. Moreover, higher wages can stimulate economic growth by increasing consumer spending, which benefits businesses and the overall economy. Opponents, however, express legitimate concerns about the potential negative impacts. They argue that higher labor costs may force employers to cut jobs or reduce hiring, leading to unemployment. This is a valid point, as seen in some industries where automation has replaced human labor to cut costs.**

In conclusion, while the risks of job losses are real, the benefits of raising the minimum wage outweigh them. Governments should implement policies that protect workers while ensuring economic stability.

Scoring Breakdown

  • Task Response (TR): 7.0 - Presents a clear position and develops arguments with some examples.
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 7.0 - Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and some cohesive devices.
  • Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 - Uses a mix of appropriate and less precise vocabulary with some errors.
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with some errors.

Band 8.0 Answer

The issue of minimum wage is a contentious one, with compelling arguments on both sides. While some advocate for its increase to combat poverty, others caution against the potential economic fallout. I am inclined to support the former view.

Advocates of higher minimum wages present a persuasive case. They argue that increasing wages can lift people out of poverty by providing them with the means to afford better housing, nutrition, and education. For example, in countries like the UK, minimum wage increases have been linked to reduced poverty rates. Additionally, higher wages can stimulate economic growth by boosting consumer spending, which benefits businesses and the overall economy. However, critics raise valid concerns about the potential negative consequences. They contend that higher labor costs may lead employers to reduce their workforce or invest in automation, resulting in job losses. This is a legitimate concern, as evidenced by some industries where automation has replaced human labor to cut costs.**

In conclusion, while the risks of job losses are real, the benefits of raising the minimum wage are substantial. Governments should carefully consider these factors and implement policies that protect workers while ensuring economic stability.

Scoring Breakdown

  • Task Response (TR): 8.0 - Presents a clear position and develops arguments with relevant examples.
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 8.0 - Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices.
  • Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 - Uses a range of appropriate vocabulary with some less precise words and occasional errors.
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with some errors.

Band 9.0 Answer

The debate surrounding the minimum wage is multifaceted, with compelling arguments on both sides. While some advocate for its increase to alleviate poverty, others warn of potential economic repercussions. I firmly believe that the benefits of raising the minimum wage outweigh the risks.

Proponents of higher minimum wages present a compelling case. They argue that increasing wages can significantly reduce poverty by providing individuals with the means to afford better housing, nutrition, and education. For instance, in countries like Canada, minimum wage hikes have been linked to reduced poverty rates and improved living standards. Moreover, higher wages can stimulate economic growth by increasing consumer spending, which benefits businesses and the overall economy. Critics, however, raise valid concerns about the potential negative impacts. They contend that higher labor costs may lead employers to reduce their workforce or invest in automation, resulting in job losses. This is a legitimate concern, as evidenced by some industries where automation has replaced human labor to cut costs.**

In conclusion, while the risks of job losses are real, the benefits of raising the minimum wage are substantial. Governments should carefully consider these factors and implement policies that protect workers while ensuring economic stability. By striking a balance between worker welfare and economic pragmatism, societies can achieve a more equitable and prosperous future.

Scoring Breakdown

  • Task Response (TR): 9.0 - Presents a clear position and develops arguments with relevant, extended, and supported examples.
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 9.0 - Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices.
  • Lexical Resource (LR): 9.0 - Uses a wide range of appropriate vocabulary with precise and sophisticated words.
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 9.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with minimal errors.

Vocabulary Highlights

  1. Controversial (adjective): Debatable or likely to cause disagreement.
  • Example: The minimum wage is a controversial topic.
  1. Allevate (verb): To make something less severe or less intense.
  • Example: Raising the minimum wage can alleviate poverty.
  1. Repercussions (noun): An unintended consequence of an event or action.
  • Example: Others warn of potential economic repercussions.
  1. Persuasive (adjective): Good at persuading someone to do or believe something.
  • Example: Advocates of higher minimum wages present a persuasive case.
  1. Stimulate (verb): To encourage or prompt something to happen or develop.
  • Example: Higher wages can stimulate economic growth.
  1. Automation (noun): The use of machines or computers to do work that is usually done by people.
  • Example: Some industries have replaced human labor with automation.
  1. Equitable (adjective): Fair and reasonable.
  • Example: Societies can achieve a more equitable future.
  1. Prosperous (adjective): Successful in material terms; wealthy.
  • Example: A more equitable and prosperous future.
  1. Pragmatism (noun): The quality of dealing with things sensibly and realistically.
  • Example: Striking a balance between worker welfare and economic pragmatism.
  1. Welfare (noun): The health, happiness, and fortunes of a person or group.
  • Example: Governments should consider the welfare of workers.
  1. Striking a balance (phrase): To find a middle ground between two opposing views or situations.
  • Example: Striking a balance between worker welfare and economic pragmatism.
  1. Multifaceted (adjective): Having many different aspects or features.
  • Example: The debate surrounding the minimum wage is multifaceted.
  1. Legitimate (adjective): Able to be defended with logic or justification; valid.
  • Example: Critics raise legitimate concerns.
  1. Substantial (adjective): Of considerable importance, size, or worth.
  • Example: The benefits of raising the minimum wage are substantial.
  1. Implement (verb): To put a plan, law, or program into effect; to carry out.
  • Example: Governments should implement policies that protect workers.

Common Mistakes

  1. Lack of Clear Position: Many students fail to present a clear position in their introduction, leading to a lower Task Response score.
  2. Inadequate Development of Arguments: Students often present arguments without sufficient development or examples, resulting in a lower score for Task Response.
  3. Poor Coherence and Cohesion: Some students struggle with organizing their ideas logically and using cohesive devices effectively.
  4. Limited Vocabulary: Using a limited range of vocabulary can result in a lower Lexical Resource score. Students should aim to use a wide range of appropriate and sophisticated words.
  5. Grammatical Errors: Frequent grammatical errors can lower the Grammatical Range and Accuracy score. Students should proofread their work to minimize errors.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your score.