English guide
Get Band 9 model answers for IELTS Writing Task 2 language preservation two-part questions. Expert analysis of Band 6, 7, 8, and 9 responses with detailed scoring breakdowns.
What this guide covers
Search answer
Get Band 9 model answers for IELTS Writing Task 2 language preservation two-part questions. Expert analysis of Band 6, 7, 8, and 9 responses with detailed scoring breakdowns.
Related guides:
IELTS Writing Task 2 (Academic and General Training) Two-Part Question
Some people believe that it is important to preserve local languages and dialects, while others argue that the spread of major world languages is inevitable and beneficial. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Scored primarily at Band 6.0
Task Response (TR): 6.0 - Presents a position but the arguments are not sufficiently developed. Some aspects of the task are addressed. Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 6.0 - Uses cohesion well enough to manage to connect ideas but there may be some unclear referencing. The organization is clear overall but may become unclear occasionally. Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 - Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision. There are some inappropriate choices of vocabulary. Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. Has limited control of grammar and punctuation but makes frequent errors. Error correction typically affects meaning.
People have different opinions about preserving local languages. Some think it's important, while others think it's better to use major world languages. I agree with the first group.
Firstly, preserving local languages is important because it helps maintain culture. For example, in Wales, the Welsh language is very important to their culture. If people stop speaking Welsh, their culture will disappear. Secondly, local languages can help people understand their history better. For instance, some old stories and songs are only in local languages.
On the other hand, some people say that major world languages are better. They think that using languages like English or Spanish makes communication easier. For example, business people from different countries can talk to each other using English. Also, learning major languages can help people get better jobs.
In conclusion, I think preserving local languages is more important. Even if major languages are useful, local languages are part of our history and culture.
Scored primarily at Band 7.0
Task Response (TR): 7.0 - Presents a clear position throughout the response with relevant, extended, and supported ideas. Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 7.0 - Uses cohesion well to manage to connect ideas. The organization is clear overall with some unclear referencing. Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 - Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow flexibility and precision. There may be some less precise vocabulary. *Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. Has limited control of grammar and punctuation but attempts complex structures.
The preservation of local languages is a contentious issue. While some advocate for maintaining these languages, others believe the spread of major world languages is inevitable and beneficial. I firmly believe that preserving local languages is crucial.
Proponents of preserving local languages argue that these languages are integral to cultural identity. For instance, the Māori language in New Zealand is deeply tied to the Māori culture. The loss of the Māori language would mean the loss of a significant part of New Zealand's cultural heritage. Moreover, local languages often contain unique knowledge and perspectives that are invaluable. For example, some indigenous languages have specific terms for natural phenomena that are not found in major languages.
Conversely, some people contend that the spread of major world languages facilitates global communication and economic growth. English, for example, is widely used in international business and diplomacy. Proficiency in major languages can open up job opportunities and foster international cooperation. Additionally, the use of major languages can simplify education and administration in multilingual societies.
In my opinion, the benefits of preserving local languages far outweigh the advantages of using major world languages. While global communication is important, the loss of cultural and linguistic diversity would be detrimental. Therefore, efforts should be made to preserve and promote local languages.
Scored primarily at Band 8.0
Task Response (TR): 8.0 - Presents a clear position throughout the response with fully extended and supported ideas. Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 8.0 - Uses cohesion effectively to manage to connect ideas. The organization is clear and logical with some unclear referencing. Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 - Uses a wide range of vocabulary with some less common lexical items. There may be occasional less precise vocabulary. Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. Has a good control of grammar and punctuation but still makes some errors.
The debate surrounding the preservation of local languages versus the spread of major world languages is multifaceted. While some individuals champion the cause of linguistic preservation, others contend that the proliferation of major languages is an inevitable and advantageous phenomenon. I am inclined to support the former perspective.
Advocates for the preservation of local languages posit that these languages are indispensable to the maintenance of cultural diversity. For example, the Basque language in Spain is a unique linguistic entity that has survived for centuries, embodying the distinct cultural identity of the Basque people. The erosion of such languages would result in the loss of cultural heritage and historical continuity. Furthermore, local languages often encapsulate unique worldviews and knowledge systems. For instance, the Inuit language has numerous terms for different types of snow, reflecting the intricate relationship between the Inuit people and their environment.
Conversely, proponents of major world languages argue that these languages promote global connectivity and economic prosperity. The widespread use of English, for example, facilitates international trade and cooperation. Proficiency in major languages can enhance career prospects and foster cross-cultural understanding. Additionally, the adoption of major languages can streamline education and governance in linguistically diverse regions.
In my view, the preservation of local languages is paramount. While the practical benefits of major languages are undeniable, the loss of linguistic diversity would impoverish the cultural landscape. Therefore, concerted efforts should be undertaken to safeguard and revitalize local languages.
Scored primarily at Band 9.0
Task Response (TR): 9.0 - Presents a clear position throughout the response with fully extended and supported ideas. Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 9.0 - Uses cohesion effectively to manage to connect ideas. The organization is clear and logical with some unclear referencing. Lexical Resource (LR): 9.0 - Uses a wide range of vocabulary with precise and sophisticated lexical items. *Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 9.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. Has a full control of grammar and punctuation.
The preservation of local languages and dialects is a topic of considerable contention. While some individuals assert the necessity of maintaining these languages, others contend that the global domination of major languages is an inevitable and beneficial development. I am firmly convinced that the preservation of local languages is of paramount importance.
Those who advocate for the preservation of local languages argue that these languages are intrinsic to the preservation of cultural identity. For instance, the Welsh language is not merely a means of communication but a cornerstone of Welsh culture. The loss of the Welsh language would signify the erosion of a unique cultural heritage. Moreover, local languages often contain invaluable knowledge and perspectives that are not found in major languages. For example, the Native American language of the Hopi contains specific terms for natural phenomena that are not present in English.
Conversely, proponents of major world languages posit that these languages facilitate global communication and economic growth. The widespread use of English, for example, has revolutionized international business and diplomacy. Proficiency in major languages can enhance career opportunities and foster international cooperation. Additionally, the adoption of major languages can simplify education and administration in multilingual societies.
In my opinion, the preservation of local languages is crucial. While the practical advantages of major languages are evident, the loss of linguistic diversity would be a profound cultural loss. Therefore, concerted efforts should be made to preserve and promote local languages.
Preservation (noun): the act of keeping something in its original state; example: The preservation of ancient texts is essential for understanding our cultural heritage. Inevitable (adjective): impossible to avoid or prevent; example: The spread of major languages is seen as inevitable in a globalized world. Beneficial (adjective): resulting in good; example: The use of major languages is often seen as beneficial for international communication. Maintain (verb): to keep in an existing state; example: It is important to maintain local languages to preserve cultural diversity. Facilitate (verb): to make easier; example: The widespread use of English facilitates international trade. Prosperity (noun): a successful, flourishing, or thriving condition; example: The use of major languages is often associated with economic prosperity. Streamline (verb): to make more efficient and effective by employing faster and simpler working methods; example: The adoption of major languages can streamline education and governance. Intrinsic (adjective): belonging naturally; essential; example: Local languages are intrinsic to the preservation of cultural identity. Erosion (noun): the process of being gradually worn away; example: The erosion of local languages would result in the loss of cultural heritage. Invaluable (adjective): extremely useful; priceless; example: Local languages often contain invaluable knowledge and perspectives. Profound (adjective): very great or intense; example: The loss of linguistic diversity would be a profound cultural loss.
Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 responses scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to help you improve.