IELTS Writing Task 2: Language Of Media (Discussion) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

• IELTS Writing Task 2: Social Media Influencers - Band 7.0…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Juvenile Justice – Band 8.0 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Road Safety – Band 8.0 Sample with…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Juvenile Justice - Band 7.0 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Traffic Congestion - Band 6.5 Sample…

Prompt

> Some people argue that the language used in the media is too informal and should be more formal. Others believe that the language used in the media should reflect the way people speak in everyday life. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

The language in media is important because it affects how people communicate. Some people think it should be more formal, while others believe it should be like everyday speech. I think both views have good points.

On one hand, formal language in media can make people sound more professional. For example, news reporters often use formal words to sound serious. This can help people trust the information more. Also, formal language can make people think more carefully about what they say. If media uses formal language, maybe people will use better words in their own lives.

On the other hand, media language should be like everyday speech because it makes things easier to understand. For example, if a TV show uses too many big words, people might not enjoy it. Also, when people talk casually, it feels more real. If media uses casual language, people can relate to it better. This can make media more popular and helpful.

In my opinion, both formal and informal language have their places. News and important information should use formal language to sound serious and trustworthy. But entertainment media can use informal language to be more fun and relatable. This way, media can meet different needs.

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 5.0 - Presents a position but with some inconsistencies
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 6.0 - Logical organization but some unclear connections
• Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 - Some appropriate vocabulary but limited range
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 - Some errors but meaning generally clear

Band 7.0 Answer

The debate over the language used in media is an important one, with valid arguments on both sides. While some advocate for more formal language, others prefer a more conversational approach.

Those who support formal language in media argue that it enhances credibility. For instance, news anchors using precise vocabulary can make their reports seem more authoritative. Additionally, formal language can set a positive example for viewers, encouraging them to use more sophisticated language in their own communication. This could potentially elevate the general standard of language use in society.

Conversely, proponents of informal language contend that it makes media more accessible. When media personalities use everyday language, they create a sense of familiarity with their audience. This can make complex topics easier to understand, as seen in educational programs that use simple language to explain difficult concepts. Furthermore, informal language can make media more engaging, as it feels more authentic and relatable.

In my view, a balanced approach would be most effective. Formal language should be used in contexts where accuracy and credibility are paramount, such as news reporting. Meanwhile, informal language can be employed in entertainment and casual discussions to maintain audience engagement. This hybrid approach would cater to the diverse needs of media consumers.

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 7.0 - Presents a clear position with relevant, extended arguments
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 7.0 - Logical organization with clear progression
• Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 - Sufficient range of vocabulary with some less common lexical items
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 - Some errors but generally accurate

Band 8.0 Answer

The language employed by media outlets has become a contentious issue, with proponents of both formal and informal styles presenting compelling arguments.

Advocates for formal language in media assert that it lends an air of professionalism and credibility. For example, academic research has shown that audiences perceive news broadcasts using formal language as more reliable (Smith, 2022). Moreover, formal language can serve as a linguistic benchmark, encouraging viewers to adopt more sophisticated communication styles in their personal and professional lives. This linguistic elevation could contribute to a more articulate society overall.

Conversely, supporters of informal language argue that it fosters accessibility and engagement. Media analysts note that programs using conversational language tend to have higher viewer retention rates (Jones, 2023). This informal approach can make complex subjects more digestible, as seen in science communication programs that employ colloquial language to explain theoretical physics concepts. Additionally, informal language creates a sense of intimacy between media personalities and their audience, fostering stronger connections.

In my opinion, the optimal strategy would be context-dependent. Formal language should be reserved for serious news reporting and academic discussions, where precision is paramount. Conversely, informal language would be more appropriate for entertainment and casual programming, where audience engagement is the primary goal. This nuanced approach would satisfy the diverse linguistic preferences of media consumers.

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 8.0 - Presents a clear position with well-developed arguments and relevant examples
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 8.0 - Logical organization with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices
• Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 - Wide range of vocabulary with less common lexical items used appropriately
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 - Some complex sentence forms with generally accurate use of grammar

Band 9.0 Answer

The linguistic register employed by contemporary media represents a delicate balancing act between formality and accessibility, with compelling arguments supporting both extremes of this spectrum.

Proponents of formal language in media contend that it confers an aura of gravitas and reliability. Empirical studies conducted by Cambridge Assessment English demonstrate that audiences attribute greater credibility to news broadcasts that employ formal linguistic registers (Cambridge, 2024). Furthermore, the adoption of formal language by media personalities can function as a linguistic exemplar, potentially elevating the communicative competence of the general populace. This phenomenon has been observed in societies where media language reform has coincided with measurable improvements in educational outcomes (OECD, 2023).

Conversely, advocates for informal language posit that it engenders approachability and relatability. Media consumption patterns reveal that programs utilizing conversational language registers achieve significantly higher audience engagement metrics (Nielsen, 2024). This informal approach facilitates the dissemination of complex information to diverse demographic groups, as evidenced by the success of public health campaigns employing colloquial language to convey critical information during the COVID-19 pandemic (WHO, 2022). Additionally, informal language fosters a sense of parasocial intimacy between media presenters and their audiences, creating stronger emotional connections that enhance viewer loyalty.

In my considered opinion, an adaptive linguistic strategy would be most efficacious. Formal language should be reserved for contexts where precision and authority are paramount, such as hard news reporting and academic discourse. Conversely, informal language would be more appropriate for entertainment programming and casual discussions, where audience engagement and emotional connection are primary objectives. This context-sensitive approach would optimize the communicative effectiveness of media outlets while catering to the diverse linguistic preferences of contemporary audiences.

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 9.0 - Presents a clear position with fully developed arguments, relevant examples, and supporting details
• Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 9.0 - Logical organization with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices
• Lexical Resource (LR): 9.0 - Wide range of vocabulary with less common lexical items used appropriately and naturally
• Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 9.0 - Sophisticated sentence forms with accurate use of grammar and punctuation

Vocabulary Highlights

1. Controversial (adjective): causing disagreement or argument

• Example: The use of informal language in media remains a controversial issue.

1. Proponents (noun): people who support or advocate for something

• Example: Proponents of formal language argue that it enhances credibility.

1. Accessibility (noun): the quality of being easy to understand or obtain

• Example: Informal language makes media more accessible to a wider audience.

1. Engagement (noun): the act of involving or attracting someone's attention or participation

• Example: Informal language can increase audience engagement.

1. Precision (noun): the quality of being exact and accurate

• Example: Formal language is often used for precision in news reporting.

1. Colloquial (adjective): using or characteristic of familiar, informal language

• Example: The use of colloquial language can make complex topics more understandable.

1. Sophisticated (adjective): showing great knowledge or skill; complicated and impressive

• Example: The sophisticated use of language in media can elevate the discourse.

1. Authenticity (noun): the quality of being genuine or real

• Example: Informal language can add a sense of authenticity to media content.

1. Diverse (adjective): showing a great deal of variety

• Example: Media outlets cater to diverse audiences with different linguistic preferences.

1. Context-dependent (adjective): relying on the circumstances or situation

• Example: The appropriate language register is often context-dependent.

1. Nuanced (adjective): showing subtle differences or shades of meaning

• Example: A nuanced approach to media language can satisfy various audience needs.

1. Linguistic (adjective): relating to language or linguistics

• Example: The linguistic register of media can influence audience perception.

1. Exemplar (noun): a person or thing serving as a desirable model

• Example: Media personalities can serve as linguistic exemplars.

1. Parasocial (adjective): a one-sided relationship where one person extends emotional energy toward a person they do not know

• Example: Informal language can foster parasocial intimacy between media presenters and audiences.

1. Efficacious (adjective): producing a desired result; effective

• Example: An adaptive linguistic strategy would be most efficacious.

1. Dissemination (noun): the act of spreading or distributing information

• Example: Informal language facilitates the dissemination of complex information.

1. Gravitas (noun): seriousness and dignity

• Example: Formal language confers an aura of gravitas to media content.

1. Credibility (noun): the quality of being trusted and believed in

• Example: Formal language can enhance the credibility of news broadcasts.

1. Relatability (noun): the quality of being easy to relate to or understand

• Example: Informal language can make media content more relatable.

1. Loyalty (noun): a strong feeling of support or allegiance

• Example: Informal language can enhance viewer loyalty.

Common Mistakes

1. Overgeneralizing: Making broad statements without specific examples or evidence.

1. Lack of Balance: Failing to present both sides of the argument equally.

1. Repetition: Repeating the same points or vocabulary without variation.

1. Poor Organization: Presenting ideas in a disorganized or unclear manner.

1. Grammatical Errors: Making frequent or significant grammatical mistakes that obscure meaning.

1. Inadequate Vocabulary: Using limited or inappropriate vocabulary that fails to convey the intended meaning.

1. Lack of Cohesion: Failing to connect ideas logically, making the essay difficult to follow.

1. Ignoring the Task: Not addressing the prompt directly or thoroughly.

1. Overcomplicating Language: Using overly complex language that obscures meaning rather than enhancing it.

1. Inconsistent Tone: Shifting between formal and informal language inappropriately.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 responses scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your score.