IELTS Writing Task 2: Juvenile Justice (Agree Disagree) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

• IELTS Writing Task 2: Juvenile Justice – Band 8.0 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Traffic Congestion - Band 6.5 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Road Safety – Band 8.0 Sample with…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Juvenile Justice - Band 7.0 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Rehabilitation: Band 9.0 Sample Answer

The IELTS Writing Task 2 Prompt (Agree/Disagree)

Prompt:

Some people believe that young offenders should be punished just as severely as adults. Others argue that young people should be given a second chance. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Model Answers with Scoring Breakdowns

Band 6.0 Answer

Response:

It is often thought that young criminals should be punished like adults. I agree with this view.

Some people say that young criminals should be given a second chance. They believe that young people make mistakes and should be given the opportunity to change. However, I disagree with this opinion. Young people who commit crimes should be punished because it will teach them a lesson and prevent them from committing more crimes in the future.

Those who support this idea argue that young offenders should be treated differently because they are not fully mature. They say that punishment should be educational rather than harsh. However, I think that if young people are not punished severely, they will continue to commit crimes.

In conclusion, I believe that young offenders should be punished just as severely as adults. This will help them understand the seriousness of their actions and prevent them from repeating their mistakes.

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 5.0 – Presents a clear position but with limited development. Some ideas are relevant but lack depth.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 6.0 – Logical organization but with some repetition and lack of clear progression.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 – Uses a mix of appropriate and less accurate vocabulary. Some errors in word choice.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 – Attempts complex structures but with frequent errors. Sentences are mostly understandable.

Band 7.0 Answer

Response:

The debate surrounding the punishment of young offenders is a contentious one. While some advocate for leniency, I firmly believe that young criminals should face the same consequences as adults.

On one hand, proponents of leniency argue that young offenders are still developing and should be given the chance to reform. They contend that harsh punishments could have long-term negative effects on their psychological well-being. For instance, rehabilitation programs are often cited as a more effective alternative to imprisonment. However, this view overlooks the fact that leniency can send the wrong message to young offenders, potentially encouraging further criminal behavior.

On the other hand, those who support strict punishments assert that young offenders must understand the gravity of their actions. By imposing the same penalties as those given to adults, society can deter future crimes and maintain a sense of justice. For example, countries with stringent juvenile justice systems often report lower recidivism rates. This suggests that severe consequences can act as a deterrent.

In my opinion, young offenders should be held accountable for their actions just like adults. While rehabilitation is important, it should not come at the expense of justice. A balanced approach that combines strict punishments with opportunities for rehabilitation would be ideal.

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 7.0 – Presents a clear position with relevant, extended arguments. Covers both views but with some unevenness.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 7.0 – Logical organization with clear progression. Uses a mix of cohesive devices effectively.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 – Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary with some less common lexical items. Occasional errors in word choice and collocation.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 – Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. Some errors but generally understandable.

Band 8.0 Answer

Response:

The question of whether young offenders should be punished as severely as adults is a complex issue that elicits strong opinions on both sides. While some argue for leniency, I firmly believe that young criminals should face stringent penalties.

Those who advocate for leniency contend that young offenders are still in the process of maturation and should be given the opportunity to reform. They argue that harsh punishments could have detrimental effects on their psychological development and future prospects. For example, proponents of this view often cite successful rehabilitation programs that have helped young offenders reintegrate into society. However, this perspective fails to consider the potential for leniency to be misinterpreted as a lack of consequences, which could embolden further criminal behavior.

Conversely, those who support strict punishments assert that young offenders must be held accountable for their actions. By imposing the same penalties as those given to adults, society can send a clear message that crime will not be tolerated. For instance, research has shown that countries with rigorous juvenile justice systems often have lower rates of repeat offenses. This suggests that severe consequences can act as a powerful deterrent.

In my view, young offenders should be subject to the same penalties as adults. While rehabilitation is undoubtedly important, it should not be pursued at the expense of justice. A balanced approach that combines strict punishments with opportunities for rehabilitation would be the most effective solution.

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 8.0 – Presents a clear position with relevant, extended arguments. Covers both views with balanced development.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 8.0 – Logical organization with clear progression. Uses a wide range of cohesive devices effectively.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 – Uses a wide range of vocabulary with some less common lexical items. Occasional errors in word choice and collocation.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 – Uses a wide range of complex sentence forms. Some errors but generally accurate and sophisticated.

Band 9.0 Answer

Response:

The contentious issue of whether young offenders should be subjected to the same punitive measures as adults has sparked intense debate. While some advocates for leniency, I am firmly of the opinion that juvenile delinquents should be held to the same standards as adult criminals.

Proponents of leniency argue that young offenders are still in the formative stages of their development and should be afforded the chance to rectify their mistakes. They posit that harsh punishments could have enduring negative repercussions on the offenders' psychological well-being and future prospects. For instance, they often cite the success of rehabilitation programs that have facilitated the reintegration of young offenders into society. However, this viewpoint disregards the potential for leniency to be misconstrued as a lack of accountability, which could inadvertently encourage further delinquent behavior.

Conversely, proponents of stringent punishments maintain that young offenders must be made to answer for their actions. By enforcing the same penalties as those meted out to adults, society can convey a unambiguous message that criminal behavior will not be condoned. For example, empirical data from countries with stringent juvenile justice systems indicate lower recidivism rates, suggesting that severe consequences can serve as a potent deterrent.

In my estimation, young offenders should be held accountable to the same degree as adults. While the importance of rehabilitation cannot be overstated, it should not be pursued at the expense of justice. An equitable approach that amalgamates stringent punishments with opportunities for rehabilitation would be the most efficacious solution.

Scoring Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 9.0 – Presents a clear position with relevant, extended arguments. Covers both views with balanced and in-depth development.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 9.0 – Logical organization with clear progression. Uses a wide range of cohesive devices effectively and naturally.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 9.0 – Uses a wide range of vocabulary with high precision and sophistication. No errors in word choice and collocation.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 9.0 – Uses a wide range of complex sentence forms with high accuracy and sophistication. No errors.

Vocabulary Highlights

Useful Words and Phrases for Discussing Juvenile Justice

1. Delinquent (noun/adj.) – A young person who commits crimes or behaves badly.

• Example: Juvenile delinquents often come from disadvantaged backgrounds.

1. Rehabilitation (noun) – The process of helping someone to return to normal life after a period of crime or illness.

• Example: Rehabilitation programs aim to reintegrate young offenders into society.

1. Recidivism (noun) – The tendency of a convicted criminal to reoffend.

• Example: Countries with strict juvenile justice systems often report lower recidivism rates.

1. Lenient (adj.) – Showing or characterized by tolerance of behavior that is considered wrong or immoral.

• Example: Some argue for a more lenient approach to juvenile justice.

1. Stringent (adj.) – Strict, precise, and exacting.

• Example: Stringent punishments can act as a deterrent for young offenders.

1. Deterrent (noun) – A thing that discourages or is intended to discourage someone from doing something.

• Example: Severe consequences can serve as a potent deterrent.

1. Accountability (noun) – The fact or condition of being accountable or to which a person is to be held accountable.

• Example: Young offenders must be held accountable for their actions.

1. Repercussion (noun) – An unintended consequence of an event or action, especially an unfavorable one.

• Example: Harsh punishments could have enduring negative repercussions.

1. Formative (adj.) – Influencing the early stages of someone's development.

• Example: Young offenders are still in the formative stages of their development.

1. Condone (verb) – Accept and allow (behavior that is considered morally wrong or offensive) to continue.

• Example: Society must not condone criminal behavior.

1. Reintegrate (verb) – To integrate or restore (someone) into a social group.

• Example: Rehabilitation programs aim to reintegrate young offenders into society.

1. Empirical (adj.) – Based on observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic.

• Example: Empirical data from countries with stringent juvenile justice systems indicate lower recidivism rates.

1. Punitive (adj.) – Intended as punishment.

• Example: Punitive measures should be enforced to deter young offenders.

1. Amalgamate (verb) – Combine or merge a number of things into one coherent whole.

• Example: An equitable approach amalgamates stringent punishments with rehabilitation.

1. Efficacious (adj.) – (Of something inanimate or abstract) producing a decided, decisive, or desired effect.

• Example: An equitable approach would be the most efficacious solution.

Common Mistakes Students Make

1. Lack of Clarity in Position: Many students fail to clearly state their opinion, leading to a lower score in Task Response.
2. Inadequate Development of Arguments: Some students present their ideas but do not develop them sufficiently, resulting in a weaker response.
3. Repetition of Ideas: Repeating the same points without adding new information can lower the score in Coherence and Cohesion.
4. Grammar and Vocabulary Errors: Frequent grammatical mistakes and inappropriate word choices can affect the Grammatical Range and Accuracy and Lexical Resource scores.
5. Poor Organization: A disorganized essay can make it difficult for the examiner to follow the arguments, impacting the overall score.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Submit your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response to English AIdol's AI scoring engine to get instant feedback on your Task Response, Cohesion and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. Identify your strengths and areas for improvement with detailed analytics.