English guide
Band 9 model answers for IELTS Writing Task 2 junk food tax two-part question. Get sample responses for Bands 6-9 with scoring breakdowns.
What this guide covers
Search answer
Band 9 model answers for IELTS Writing Task 2 junk food tax two-part question. Get sample responses for Bands 6-9 with scoring breakdowns.
Related guides:
Paraphrased IELTS Writing Task 2 Question: Some governments propose implementing taxes on junk food to improve public health. Others believe this approach is ineffective. What is your opinion? Additionally, discuss the potential consequences of such a tax for both individuals and society.
**Junk food taxes are not a good solution because they unfairly target people. Many cannot afford healthy food and will still eat junk food. Governments should focus on education about healthy eating instead. A junk food tax could make people poorer while not really improving health.
For society, this tax might reduce obesity slightly but make people angry. Businesses selling junk food would suffer, causing job losses. Individuals would spend more money on food, which is unfair. Education about healthy eating would be better because it teaches people to make good choices without extra costs.**
**The implementation of taxes on junk food has sparked considerable debate regarding their effectiveness in promoting public health. While I believe such taxes can be beneficial, they should be accompanied by comprehensive educational campaigns.
From an individual perspective, junk food taxes can discourage consumption of unhealthy products. However, these taxes disproportionately affect lower-income individuals who may not have access to affordable healthy alternatives. For society, a well-publicized tax could raise significant revenue for healthcare systems, though it might also lead to job losses in the food industry. To mitigate these effects, governments should invest the tax revenue in subsidizing healthy foods and nutritional education programs.**
**The proposition of taxing junk food as a public health measure has garnered significant attention. In my view, while such taxes can be effective, their implementation must be carefully managed to avoid unintended consequences.
On an individual level, junk food taxes can incentivize healthier eating habits by increasing the cost of unhealthy options. However, these taxes may place an undue financial burden on low-income households, who already struggle with food affordability. Society-wide, the revenue generated from such taxes could be channeled into public health initiatives, though there is a risk of job losses in the food industry. To ensure fairness, governments should consider tiered tax systems that account for income levels and invest in education campaigns to promote long-term behavioral change.**
**The debate surrounding the implementation of junk food taxes to mitigate public health concerns is multifaceted. While I contend that such taxes can be an effective tool, their success hinges on thoughtful execution and complementary policies.
From an individual perspective, a well-designed junk food tax can serve as a disincentive for the consumption of unhealthy products. However, it is imperative to consider the regressive nature of such taxes, which disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. Society stands to benefit from the revenue generated, which could be allocated to public health programs. Nevertheless, potential job losses in the food industry and the risk of a black market for unhealthy foods must be addressed. To maximize the efficacy of junk food taxes, governments should implement them in conjunction with subsidies for healthy foods, nutritional education, and targeted support for affected industries.**
Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 responses scored by AI on English AIdol. Our AI-powered platform provides instant feedback to help you improve your score.
Junk food topics appear approximately 3-4 times per year in IELTS Writing Task 2, according to Cambridge Assessment English data.
The ideal length is 250-270 words. Responses under 250 words may lose marks for Task Response.
Vocabulary accounts for 25% of your score. Using a range of appropriate and sophisticated words can significantly boost your Lexical Resource score.
Yes, personal examples can strengthen your arguments, but they should be relevant and well-developed.
Dedicate one paragraph to each part of the question, ensuring both parts are addressed equally. Use clear topic sentences to introduce each idea.
Common mistakes include ignoring one part of the question, lack of specific examples, overgeneralizing, poor paragraph structure, and repetition.
Use a variety of cohesive devices such as conjunctions, transition words, and referencing to create a logical flow between ideas.
A Band 8 response demonstrates more sophisticated vocabulary, complex sentence structures, and better development of ideas compared to a Band 7 response.
Practice regularly using past exam questions, get feedback from teachers or AI tools, and review model answers to understand what examiners look for.
Label: 40% of test-takers Value: Use limited vocabulary Source: Cambridge Assessment English
Label: 25% of test-takers Value: Score below Band 6 Source: Cambridge Assessment English