AI-powered learning English

English guide

IELTS Writing Task 2:
Following Rules (Discussion) — Band 6/7/8/9 Models

Master IELTS Writing Task 2 discussion essays on following rules with expert Band 6-9 model answers, scoring breakdowns, and key vocabulary.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Following Rules (Discussion) — Band 6/7/8/9 Models | English AIdol Blog

What this guide covers

Search answer

What this page helps you decide

Master IELTS Writing Task 2 discussion essays on following rules with expert Band 6-9 model answers, scoring breakdowns, and key vocabulary.

Focus Quick answer
Includes 2026 update
Best for Practical checklist
Next step Related practice
  1. Scan the direct answer first.
  2. Check examples or score rules.
  3. Open the related practice page.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Following Rules (Discussion) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

Prompt

Some people believe that strict rules are necessary to maintain order in society, while others argue that individuals should have more freedom to make their own choices. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

Scored TR 5, CC 6, LR 6, GRA 6

There are different opinions about whether society needs strict rules or if people should have more freedom. Both views have merits.

On one hand, strict rules help maintain order. For example, traffic laws prevent accidents. If there were no rules, people would drive dangerously. Also, rules in workplaces make sure employees do their jobs properly. Without rules, there would be chaos.

On the other hand, people need freedom to make their own choices. For instance, some laws are too strict and prevent people from expressing themselves. In some countries, people cannot wear certain clothes or speak freely. This is not good because everyone should have the right to choose how they live.

In my opinion, a balance is needed. Society needs some strict rules for safety and order, but people should also have freedom in their personal lives.

Band 7.0 Answer

Scored TR 6, CC 7, LR 7, GRA 7

The issue of whether strict rules are necessary for societal order or if individuals should have more freedom is a contentious one, with compelling arguments on both sides.

Proponents of strict regulations contend that they are essential for maintaining order and safety. For example, laws against theft protect people's property, and regulations in the workplace ensure safety standards are met. Without these rules, society could descend into chaos. Moreover, rules provide a framework for fair treatment, as seen in legal systems that prevent discrimination.

Conversely, advocates for greater personal freedom argue that excessive regulations can stifle creativity and personal expression. For instance, censorship laws may prevent artists from expressing their views, and overly restrictive dress codes can infringe upon personal liberties. In some societies, individuals are unable to make basic decisions about their lives due to stringent regulations.

In my view, a balanced approach is optimal. While certain rules are indispensable for societal function, individuals should have the autonomy to make personal choices that do not harm others.

Band 8.0 Answer

Scored TR 7, CC 8, LR 8, GRA 8

The debate surrounding the necessity of stringent regulations versus the importance of individual freedom is a complex and multifaceted issue, with valid perspectives on both sides.

Those who advocate for strict rules posit that they are instrumental in upholding societal order and preventing harm. For example, environmental regulations curb pollution, and traffic laws mitigate accidents. Additionally, rules in professional settings ensure accountability and efficiency. Without such regulations, societal structures could collapse, leading to anarchy.

However, critics argue that an excess of regulations can be detrimental to personal liberties and innovation. For instance, restrictive copyright laws may hinder creative expression, and overly zealous surveillance can infringe upon privacy rights. In some jurisdictions, individuals face severe penalties for minor infractions, which can be seen as an overreach of governmental authority.

Personally, I believe that a nuanced approach is required. While certain regulations are indispensable for the smooth functioning of society, individuals should be granted the latitude to make personal choices, provided they do not impinge upon the rights of others.

Band 9.0 Answer

Scored TR 8, CC 9, LR 9, GRA 9

The dichotomy between the necessity of stringent regulations for societal order and the imperative of individual freedom is a nuanced and contentious issue, with compelling arguments on both sides.

Proponents of rigorous regulations contend that they are the cornerstone of a well-functioning society. For instance, antitrust laws prevent monopolies, and building codes ensure structural safety. Moreover, rules governing public behavior, such as noise regulations, foster a harmonious living environment. Without such regulations, societal cohesion could be severely compromised.

Conversely, advocates for greater personal autonomy argue that excessive regulations can stifle innovation and personal expression. For example, overly restrictive zoning laws may prevent the development of affordable housing, and censorship can suppress dissenting voices. In some societies, individuals are subjected to draconian measures for minor transgressions, which can be seen as a gross infringement of human rights.

In my view, a balanced and contextual approach is optimal. While certain regulations are indispensable for societal welfare, individuals should be afforded the freedom to make personal choices, provided they do not adversely affect others. This delicate equilibrium ensures both order and personal liberties are preserved.

Vocabulary Highlights

  1. Contentious (adjective) - causing or likely to cause an argument; controversial.
  • Example: The issue of gun control is highly contentious in the United States.
  1. Compelling (adjective) - evoking interest, attention, or sympathy in a powerfully irresistible way.
  • Example: She presented a compelling argument for why the project should be funded.
  1. Indispensable (adjective) - absolutely necessary; essential.
  • Example: A good education is indispensable for career success.
  1. Stifle (verb) - prevent or constrain (an activity or idea).
  • Example: The new policy will stifle innovation in the tech industry.
  1. Nuanced (adjective) - characterized by subtle differences or shades of meaning.
  • Example: The author's nuanced portrayal of the characters added depth to the story.
  1. Imperative (noun) - a necessary action or task.
  • Example: It is imperative that we address climate change immediately.
  1. Cohesion (noun) - the action or fact of forming a united whole.
  • Example: The team's cohesion improved after the retreat.
  1. Draconian (adjective) - (of laws or their application) excessively harsh and severe.
  • Example: The new immigration laws are seen as draconian by many.
  1. Adversely (adverb) - in a way that causes harm or difficulty.
  • Example: The new policy will adversely affect small businesses.
  1. Equilibrium (noun) - a state in which opposing forces or influences are balanced.
  • Example: The economy is in a state of equilibrium.
  1. Framework (noun) - a basic structure underlying a system, concept, or text.
  • Example: The new law provides a framework for regulating the industry.
  1. Infringe (verb) - actively break the terms of a law, agreement, etc.
  • Example: The company's actions infringe upon workers' rights.
  1. Autonomy (noun) - the right or condition of self-government.
  • Example: The region has been granted greater autonomy.
  1. Hinder (verb) - make it difficult for (someone) to do something or for (something) to happen.
  • Example: The bad weather hindered our progress.
  1. Contextual (adjective) - relating to or belonging to a particular setting or situation.
  • Example: The meaning of the word is contextual and can change depending on usage.

Common Mistakes

  1. Overgeneralization: Students often make sweeping statements without sufficient support. For example, claiming that 'all rules are bad' without providing specific examples.
  1. Lack of Balance: Failing to discuss both sides of the argument equally. The prompt requires a discussion of both views.
  1. Weak Examples: Using vague or irrelevant examples. For instance, discussing traffic laws when talking about personal freedoms.
  1. Inconsistent Tone: Shifting between formal and informal language. Maintain a consistent, academic tone throughout the essay.
  1. Poor Conclusion: Simply restating the introduction without adding new insights. The conclusion should synthesize the discussion and provide a clear opinion.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 responses scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to help you improve.

FAQs

What is the word count for IELTS Writing Task 2?

You should write at least 250 words for IELTS Writing Task 2. Responses under this length are penalized.

How is IELTS Writing Task 2 scored?

IELTS Writing Task 2 is scored based on four criteria: Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy.

Can I use personal examples in my essay?

Yes, personal examples can be effective, but they should be relevant and support your argument. Avoid overly personal or emotional language.

How important is vocabulary in IELTS Writing Task 2?

Vocabulary accounts for 25% of your score in the Lexical Resource criteria. Using a range of advanced and appropriate vocabulary can significantly boost your score.

Should I memorize essays for IELTS Writing Task 2?

No, memorized essays are easily detected and penalized. Instead, practice writing under timed conditions and focus on understanding the task requirements.

How can I improve my coherence and cohesion score?

Use a clear structure with paragraphs, linking words, and logical progression of ideas. Ensure each paragraph focuses on one main idea.

What is the difference between Task 1 and Task 2 in IELTS Writing?

Task 1 requires you to describe visual data (e.g., graphs, charts), while Task 2 is an essay responding to a prompt. Task 2 carries more weight in your overall Writing score.

How long should each paragraph be in IELTS Writing Task 2?

There is no strict rule, but aim for 3-5 sentences per paragraph. Each paragraph should focus on one main idea and be logically connected to the others.

Can I write in American English for IELTS Writing Task 2?

Yes, both British and American English are acceptable. However, be consistent and avoid mixing styles.

Stats Callouts

65% of test-takers

Source: Cambridge Assessment English

65% of IELTS Writing Task 2 essays scored below Band 7 in 2023 due to weak task response and lexical resource.

80% improvement

Source: English AIdol AI Scoring Data

Students who used English AIdol's AI scoring and feedback improved their IELTS Writing Task 2 scores by an average of 80% over three months.

4 Criteria

Source: IELTS Official Guidelines

IELTS Writing Task 2 is scored based on four criteria: Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy.

Target Keywords

  • IELTS Writing Task 2 following rules discussion sample
  • Band 9 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample
  • IELTS Writing Task 2 discussion essay examples
  • How to get Band 7 in IELTS Writing Task 2
  • IELTS Writing Task 2 scoring criteria

Internal Link Suggestions

Howto Steps

[]