English guide
See a Band 9.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer about endangered species. Get step-by-step analysis, vocabulary, and expert scoring breakdown.
What this guide covers
Search answer
See a Band 9.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer about endangered species. Get step-by-step analysis, vocabulary, and expert scoring breakdown.
Related guides:
> Some people believe that protecting endangered species is a waste of money. They argue that resources should be spent on human needs instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
This is a classic IELTS Writing Task 2 opinion essay prompt. You must take a clear position and support it with reasons and examples. The prompt tests your ability to present a balanced argument while maintaining a consistent viewpoint.
Task Response (TR): 5.0 - Presents a position but with limited development. Ideas are simplistic and underdeveloped. Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 6.0 - Uses some cohesive devices but frequently disrupts flow with unnatural transitions. Lexical Resource (LR): 5.0 - Vocabulary is limited and repetitive. Some errors in word choice and collocation. Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 - Makes frequent grammatical errors that hinder communication.
While protecting endangered species is important, I think we should focus more on human needs. Many people are poor and don't have enough food or clean water. Governments should spend money on hospitals and schools instead of animals. For example, in some countries, there are not enough doctors, but they spend money on protecting rare animals. This is not fair. Animals are important, but humans are more important. Also, some endangered species might become extinct even if we protect them. So, it is better to spend money on things that can help people live better lives. In conclusion, I agree that protecting endangered species is not as important as solving human problems.
Task Response (TR): 7.0 - Presents a clear position with some development. Extends and supports ideas, though some points are not fully developed. Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 7.0 - Uses cohesive devices effectively but with some overuse and occasional awkward transitions. Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 - Uses a mix of appropriate and less precise vocabulary. Some errors in word choice and collocation. Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 - Makes some grammatical errors but generally communicates clearly.
I strongly believe that protecting endangered species is crucial, despite what some people think. These species are part of our natural heritage and play important roles in ecosystems. For instance, predators help control populations of other animals, and some plants are used in medicine. Spending money on conservation can also create jobs and support local economies. However, I understand that human needs are important. Governments should balance these priorities. One way to do this is by investing in sustainable development, which can protect both humans and wildlife. For example, reforestation projects can provide jobs while also helping endangered animals. In conclusion, I disagree with the idea that protecting endangered species is a waste of money. We need to find ways to support both human needs and conservation efforts.
Task Response (TR): 8.0 - Presents a clear position with thorough development. Extends and supports ideas with relevant examples and explanations. Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 8.0 - Uses cohesive devices effectively with mostly natural transitions. Maintains a clear progression of ideas. Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 - Uses a wide range of vocabulary with mostly appropriate and precise word choices. Some minor errors in collocation. Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 - Makes occasional grammatical errors but generally communicates clearly with varied sentence structures.
While some argue that protecting endangered species is a waste of money, I firmly believe that conservation efforts are vital for both ecological and economic reasons. Endangered species contribute to biodiversity, which is essential for healthy ecosystems. For example, bees are crucial pollinators for many crops, and their decline could lead to food shortages. Furthermore, protecting wildlife can boost ecotourism, creating jobs and supporting local communities. However, I acknowledge that human needs must also be addressed. Governments should prioritize sustainable development, such as investing in renewable energy and efficient agriculture. This approach can reduce environmental damage while improving living standards. In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the notion that protecting endangered species is unnecessary. Instead, we should strive to balance conservation with human development.
Task Response (TR): 9.0 - Presents a clear, informed, and supported position. Extends arguments with insightful examples and explanations. Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 9.0 - Uses cohesive devices skillfully with natural transitions. Maintains a clear progression of ideas throughout. Lexical Resource (LR): 9.0 - Uses a wide range of sophisticated vocabulary with precise word choices and appropriate collocations. Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 9.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures accurately and effectively.
Protecting endangered species is not a waste of money but a critical investment in our planet's future. These species are indicators of ecosystem health, and their loss can trigger ecological collapse. For instance, the extinction of apex predators can lead to overpopulation of herbivores, disrupting entire food webs. Moreover, many endangered species have significant cultural and economic value. Ecotourism, for example, generates billions of dollars annually while promoting conservation. While it is true that human needs must be prioritized, this does not necessitate neglecting wildlife conservation. Integrated approaches, such as sustainable agriculture and renewable energy, can address both human development and environmental protection. Governments should allocate resources strategically, fostering partnerships between conservation organizations and local communities. In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the notion that protecting endangered species is frivolous. Instead, it is a moral imperative and a practical necessity for ensuring a sustainable future.
Practice makes perfect! Submit your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response about endangered species and get instant AI scoring and feedback on English AIdol. Our advanced AI evaluates your response based on the official IELTS criteria and provides detailed insights to help you improve.