IELTS Writing Task 2: Drug Legalization - Band 7.0 Sample with Full Breakdown

Related guides:

• IELTS Writing Task 2: Road Safety – Band 8.0 Sample with…
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Rehabilitation: Band 9.0 Sample Answer
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Juvenile Justice – Band 8.0 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Traffic Congestion - Band 6.5 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Social Media Influencers - Band 7.0…

Prompt

Some people argue that governments should legalize drugs to reduce crime and improve public health. Others believe that drug legalization would lead to increased drug use and social problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sample Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

The legalization of drugs is a controversial issue. Some people think that legalizing drugs can reduce crime and improve health, while others believe it will cause more problems. I think both sides have valid points.

On one hand, legalizing drugs might reduce crime. If drugs are legal, people won't need to buy them from criminals. This could make society safer. Also, legal drugs can be controlled, so they might be safer for users. For example, in countries where drugs are legal, the government can control the quality and sell them in safe places.

On the other hand, legalizing drugs could cause more problems. If drugs are legal, more people might use them. This could lead to health problems and social issues. For instance, if more people use drugs, there might be more accidents and less productivity at work. Also, families might suffer if their loved ones become addicted.

In my opinion, the government should be careful about legalizing drugs. They should think about the risks and benefits before making a decision. Maybe they can start by legalizing some drugs in small areas and see what happens.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): Presents a position but with limited development. Both views are mentioned but not fully explored.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized but with some repetition and lack of clear progression.
• Lexical Resource (LR): Uses some relevant vocabulary but with some errors and limited range.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentences but with frequent errors.

Band 7.0 Answer

The debate over drug legalization is complex, with valid arguments on both sides. While some advocate for legalization to curb crime and enhance public health, others fear it would exacerbate drug use and social issues. I believe a balanced approach is necessary.

Proponents of legalization argue that it could significantly reduce crime. By removing the illegal drug trade, governments can dismantle criminal networks and redirect law enforcement resources. Additionally, regulated drugs could be safer, as seen in countries like Portugal, where decriminalization has led to better health outcomes. Legalization also allows for quality control and taxation, which can fund education and treatment programs.

However, opponents highlight the potential risks. Legal drugs might become more accessible, leading to increased use and addiction. This could strain healthcare systems and reduce workplace productivity. Moreover, social problems such as family breakdowns and accidents might rise. For example, in some U.S. states where marijuana is legal, there has been a rise in drug-related accidents.

In my view, governments should approach drug legalization cautiously. They should consider pilot programs in specific regions and monitor the outcomes before making nationwide decisions. Education and rehabilitation programs should also be prioritized to mitigate potential negative effects.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with some development. Both views are addressed with relevant examples.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and some use of cohesive devices.
• Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a mix of relevant vocabulary with some less precise language and occasional errors.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with some errors but generally effective communication.

Band 8.0 Answer

The legalization of drugs is a contentious issue that elicits strong opinions. While some contend that legalization can mitigate crime and bolster public health, others caution that it could exacerbate drug abuse and societal problems. I firmly believe that a nuanced approach is essential.

Advocates for legalization posit that it could drastically reduce crime rates. By eliminating the black market, governments can dismantle criminal syndicates and reallocate law enforcement resources. Furthermore, regulated drugs can be produced under strict quality control, ensuring safer consumption. For instance, in Portugal, decriminalization has led to a decline in drug-related deaths and HIV infections. Legalization also enables taxation, which can fund education and treatment initiatives.

Conversely, critics argue that legalization could lead to a surge in drug use and addiction. Increased accessibility might result in higher rates of substance abuse, placing a burden on healthcare systems. Additionally, social issues such as family disintegration and workplace absenteeism could escalate. For example, in some U.S. states where marijuana is legal, there has been a notable increase in drug-related accidents and workplace injuries.

In my opinion, governments should adopt a cautious and evidence-based approach to drug legalization. They should implement pilot programs in controlled environments and rigorously evaluate the outcomes. Concurrently, investing in education and rehabilitation programs is crucial to address the root causes of drug abuse.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with thorough development. Both views are addressed with relevant examples and a clear opinion.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices.
• Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a wide range of relevant vocabulary with precise and sophisticated language.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a variety of complex sentence structures with minimal errors and effective communication.

Vocabulary Highlights

1. Controversial (adjective): Debatable or likely to cause disagreement.

• Example: The legalization of drugs is a controversial issue.

1. Curb (verb): To restrain or control something.

• Example: Legalization could curb crime rates.

1. Exacerbate (verb): To make a problem worse.

• Example: Legalization might exacerbate drug use.

1. Decriminalization (noun): The act of making something no longer illegal.

• Example: Portugal's decriminalization policy has led to better health outcomes.

1. Strain (noun): A situation that causes stress or pressure.

• Example: Increased drug use could strain healthcare systems.

1. Mitigate (verb): To make something less severe or serious.

• Example: Education programs can mitigate the negative effects of drug use.

1. Syndicates (noun): Groups of people working together for a common purpose, often illegal.

• Example: Legalization can dismantle criminal syndicates.

1. Rehabilitation (noun): The process of helping someone to return to normal life after a problem.

• Example: Rehabilitation programs are crucial for addressing drug abuse.

1. Nuanced (adjective): Having subtle differences or shades of meaning.

• Example: A nuanced approach is essential for drug legalization.

1. Rigorous (adjective): Extremely thorough and careful.

• Example: Governments should conduct rigorous evaluations of pilot programs.

1. Concurrent (adjective): Happening at the same time.

• Example: Investing in education and rehabilitation programs concurrently is crucial.

1. Elicits (verb): To draw out a reaction or response.

• Example: The debate over drug legalization elicits strong opinions.

1. Bolster (verb): To support or strengthen something.

• Example: Legalization can bolster public health.

1. Disintegration (noun): The process of breaking down or falling apart.

• Example: Drug use can lead to family disintegration.

1. Absenteeism (noun): The practice of staying away from work or school without good reason.

• Example: Increased drug use might lead to higher absenteeism rates.

1. Syndicates (noun): Groups of people working together for a common purpose, often illegal.

• Example: Legalization can dismantle criminal syndicates.

1. Rehabilitation (noun): The process of helping someone to return to normal life after a problem.

• Example: Rehabilitation programs are crucial for addressing drug abuse.

1. Nuanced (adjective): Having subtle differences or shades of meaning.

• Example: A nuanced approach is essential for drug legalization.

1. Rigorous (adjective): Extremely thorough and careful.

• Example: Governments should conduct rigorous evaluations of pilot programs.

1. Concurrent (adjective): Happening at the same time.

• Example: Investing in education and rehabilitation programs concurrently is crucial.

1. Elicits (verb): To draw out a reaction or response.

• Example: The debate over drug legalization elicits strong opinions.

1. Bolster (verb): To support or strengthen something.

• Example: Legalization can bolster public health.

1. Disintegration (noun): The process of breaking down or falling apart.

• Example: Drug use can lead to family disintegration.

1. Absenteeism (noun): The practice of staying away from work or school without good reason.

• Example: Increased drug use might lead to higher absenteeism rates.

1. Strain (noun): A situation that causes stress or pressure.

• Example: Increased drug use could strain healthcare systems.

1. Mitigate (verb): To make something less severe or serious.

• Example: Education programs can mitigate the negative effects of drug use.

1. Syndicates (noun): Groups of people working together for a common purpose, often illegal.

• Example: Legalization can dismantle criminal syndicates.

1. Rehabilitation (noun): The process of helping someone to return to normal life after a problem.

• Example: Rehabilitation programs are crucial for addressing drug abuse.

1. Nuanced (adjective): Having subtle differences or shades of meaning.

• Example: A nuanced approach is essential for drug legalization.

1. Rigorous (adjective): Extremely thorough and careful.

• Example: Governments should conduct rigorous evaluations of pilot programs.

1. Concurrent (adjective): Happening at the same time.

• Example: Investing in education and rehabilitation programs concurrently is crucial.

1. Elicits (verb): To draw out a reaction or response.

• Example: The debate over drug legalization elicits strong opinions.

1. Bolster (verb): To support or strengthen something.

• Example: Legalization can bolster public health.

1. Disintegration (noun): The process of breaking down or falling apart.

• Example: Drug use can lead to family disintegration.

1. Absenteeism (noun): The practice of staying away from work or school without good reason.

• Example: Increased drug use might lead to higher absenteeism rates.

Common Mistakes

1. Overgeneralizing: Making broad statements without sufficient evidence or examples.
2. Lack of Clarity: Failing to clearly state a position or present a well-organized argument.
3. Repetition: Repeating ideas or phrases without adding new information.
4. Inadequate Vocabulary: Using limited or incorrect vocabulary, which can reduce the overall quality of the response.
5. Grammatical Errors: Making frequent grammatical mistakes that hinder understanding.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your score.