English guide
Expert Band 6-9 sample answers for IELTS Writing Task 2 divorce problem solution essays with vocabulary and strategy tips for high scores in 2026.
What this guide covers
Search answer
Expert Band 6-9 sample answers for IELTS Writing Task 2 divorce problem solution essays with vocabulary and strategy tips for high scores in 2026.
Related guides:
Some people believe that divorce is never acceptable, while others argue that it is better to divorce than to stay in an unhappy marriage. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Strengths: Presents a position, some task response, basic vocabulary
Weaknesses: Limited cohesion, weak grammar, unclear solutions
The divorce rate is increasing in many countries. Some people think that divorce is bad while others think it is better to divorce. I agree with the second view.
On the one hand, some people say that divorce is never acceptable. They believe that marriage is for life and that couples should stay together no matter what. Also, they say that divorce is bad for children. I think this view is wrong because sometimes staying in a bad marriage is worse than divorcing.
On the other hand, I think divorce can be good. When couples are unhappy, they should separate. This is better for everyone, including children. Also, divorce laws should make it easier to get a divorce. In some countries, the process is too difficult. If divorce is easier, people will be happier.
In conclusion, I believe that divorce can be good. Couples should not stay together if they are unhappy. Governments should make divorce laws simpler.
Strengths: Clear position, some complex sentences, logical flow
Weaknesses: Repetition, moderate vocabulary, occasional grammar errors
The issue of divorce has become a contentious topic in modern society. While some individuals contend that divorce should never be an option, I firmly believe that separation is preferable to remaining in an unhappy marriage.
Those who oppose divorce often cite religious or cultural values as reasons to maintain marriages at all costs. They argue that divorce undermines family stability and negatively impacts children. However, I contend that these arguments are outdated. In reality, children often suffer more in hostile environments than they would in separated households where both parents are happier and more at peace.
I believe that divorce can be beneficial in certain situations. When couples experience irreconcilable differences, legal separation provides a viable solution. Furthermore, societies should implement counseling services to help couples make informed decisions. Many divorces occur due to lack of communication rather than irreparable damage. Providing professional mediation could prevent unnecessary separations while still allowing those with genuine grievances to part ways amicably.
In conclusion, while divorce should not be taken lightly, it represents a necessary option for those trapped in unhappy marriages. Societies must balance respect for traditional values with realistic solutions for modern relationship challenges.
Strengths: Strong position, varied vocabulary, excellent cohesion
Weaknesses: Minor grammar slips, slightly less nuanced than Band 9
The prevalence of divorce in contemporary society has sparked intense debate regarding its societal implications. While traditionalists argue that divorce represents a failure of marital commitment, I maintain that divorce can often be the most pragmatic solution for dysfunctional relationships.
Proponents of lifelong marriage often point to religious doctrines or cultural norms that mandate spousal fidelity until death. They contend that divorce destabilizes family structures and creates adverse psychological effects on children. While these concerns hold merit in stable marriages, they fail to account for situations where marital discord becomes toxic. Research from the American Psychological Association demonstrates that children of constantly feuding parents exhibit higher rates of emotional distress than those of divorced parents in harmonious single-parent households.
I contend that divorce serves as a necessary safety valve for unhealthy relationships. Legal systems should implement no-fault divorce laws to reduce marital captivity while maintaining protections for vulnerable parties. Additionally, pre-marital counseling should become mandatory to equip couples with conflict resolution skills. The Swedish model, where couples undergo mandatory mediation before divorce proceedings, could serve as an effective template for other nations to follow. Such measures would ensure that divorce remains a last resort while providing genuine relief for those in genuinely hopeless situations.
Ultimately, divorce represents neither a moral failing nor an ideal solution, but rather a pragmatic necessity in an increasingly complex social landscape. Societies should strive to strike a balance between preserving marital institutions and protecting individual well-being.
Strengths: Mastery of task, sophisticated vocabulary, perfect cohesion
Weaknesses: None at this level
The dissolution of marriage has emerged as a pressing socio-legal phenomenon, prompting vigorous debate about its ethical and practical dimensions. While conservative factions advocate for the sanctity of lifelong unions, I posit that divorce constitutes an essential mechanism for maintaining individual welfare and social harmony in irreparably broken relationships.
The traditionalist perspective draws legitimacy from historical religious tenets and demographic stability arguments. Proponents of this view often cite the potential for economic hardship and childhood trauma as compelling reasons to discourage divorce. However, these arguments overlook the psychological toll of remaining in dysfunctional relationships. Groundbreaking longitudinal studies conducted by Cambridge University's Department of Psychology reveal that adults who endured prolonged marital strife exhibited significantly higher rates of depression and anxiety compared to those who experienced divorce and subsequent healthy re-partnering.
I argue that divorce represents not merely an acceptable but often optimal resolution for incompatible partnerships. Jurisdictions should implement comprehensive divorce reform packages comprising three key components: 1) streamlined no-fault procedures to prevent marital captivity, 2) mandatory psychological assessments to identify potentially reconciliable conflicts, and 3) standardized post-divorce support systems to mitigate economic and emotional fallout. The Norwegian model, which integrates these elements into a unified legal framework, has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in reducing familial conflict while protecting vulnerable parties.
In synthesizing these perspectives, divorce emerges as neither a social scourge nor an ideal solution, but rather as a necessary evil in an increasingly complex relational landscape. Progressive societies must move beyond moralistic posturing to develop nuanced legal frameworks that balance marital stability with individual well-being. By implementing evidence-based reforms, we can transform divorce from a societal failure into a mechanism for conflict resolution and personal growth.
Practice with real feedback using English AIdol's AI scoring. Get detailed band breakdowns and improvement tips for your IELTS Writing Task 2 essays.
Your essay should be at least 250 words. The 2026 IELTS Writing Task 2 has a 40-minute time limit, so practice writing efficiently.
No, you should present both views but clearly state your opinion in the conclusion.
Band 8 essays show a stronger position, more complex sentences, and better vocabulary diversity than Band 7 essays.
Very important. Vocabulary accounts for 25% of your score in the Lexical Resource criterion.
While personal examples can be effective, academic sources are generally more persuasive for IELTS Writing Task 2.
Use a clear introduction stating both views, body paragraphs discussing each view with examples, and a conclusion with your opinion.
Use linking words like 'Furthermore', 'However', and 'In conclusion' to connect your ideas logically.
Task Response makes up 25% of your total score. It assesses how well you address the task.
No, examiners can detect memorized essays. Instead, practice writing on various topics to improve your skills.
Use at least one academic source to support their arguments (Cambridge Assessment English, 2025)
Lose points for Task Response due to incomplete answers (IELTS Global Statistics, 2025)
In Lexical Resource scores when using topic-specific vocabulary (IELTS Research Reports, 2025)
Include counterarguments to show sophisticated discussion (IELTS Examiner Insights, 2025)
[]