IELTS Writing Task 2: Disability Rights (Discussion) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers
Related guides:
Prompt
Some people believe that governments should spend more money on supporting people with disabilities, while others argue that this responsibility should lie with families and charities. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Model Answers
Band 6.0 Answer
Main Body Paragraph 1
Governments should help disabled people because they have more money than families. For example, in many countries, the government provides special schools and hospitals for disabled children. Families cannot afford this. Also, governments can create laws to protect disabled people's rights. Without these laws, disabled people might be treated badly.
Main Body Paragraph 2
However, some people think families should take care of disabled members. They say that families know their disabled members better and can give more personal care. Also, charities can help, but they do not have much money. If governments spend too much money on disabled people, there might not be enough money for other important things like education and healthcare.
Opinion Paragraph
In my opinion, governments should help, but families should also take some responsibility. Governments can provide money and support, but families should take care of their disabled members at home. This way, disabled people can get the best care.
Scoring Breakdown
- Task Response (TR): Presents a position but does not always sustain it; presents, extends and supports main ideas but linked points not always logically developed.
- Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Uses some cohesive devices but these are mechanically used or repetitive.
- Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a mix of appropriate and less appropriate vocabulary; makes some attempts at less common vocabulary but these are often incorrect or inappropriate.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms; makes frequent errors in grammar and punctuation.
Band 7.0 Answer
Main Body Paragraph 1
There are compelling reasons why governments should allocate more funds to support individuals with disabilities. Primarily, governments possess greater financial resources compared to individual families or charities. For instance, many developed nations operate specialized institutions equipped with advanced facilities for disabled individuals. These institutions provide comprehensive care, including medical treatment, education, and vocational training, which families may struggle to afford. Furthermore, governmental intervention ensures the implementation of protective legislation, safeguarding the rights and welfare of disabled persons.
Main Body Paragraph 2
Conversely, proponents of family and charitable responsibility argue that familial bonds foster a more personalized and empathetic care environment. Families, being intimately acquainted with the unique needs and preferences of their disabled members, can offer tailored support. Additionally, charities often operate with a high degree of flexibility and community engagement. However, it is important to acknowledge that charities typically operate on limited budgets, and over-reliance on them may lead to inadequate support for disabled individuals.
Opinion Paragraph
In my view, a balanced approach is optimal. While governments should indeed bear the primary responsibility for funding and policy-making, families should actively participate in the care and support of disabled members. This collaborative effort ensures that disabled individuals receive both professional and personalized care, enhancing their overall quality of life.
Scoring Breakdown
- Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position throughout the response; presents, extends, and supports main ideas, but there may be a tendency to overgeneralize and/or support ideas by repetition.
- Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty at times.
- Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision; may use less common lexis with some awareness of style and collocation, with occasional errors in word choice.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms; makes occasional errors in grammar and punctuation but they do not impede communication.
Band 8.0 Answer
Main Body Paragraph 1
The argument for increased governmental expenditure on disability support is grounded in several pragmatic considerations. Governments, as the primary custodians of public funds, are better positioned to finance large-scale initiatives aimed at improving the lives of disabled individuals. For example, the establishment of specialized rehabilitation centers and the provision of assistive technologies are costly endeavors that surpass the financial capabilities of most families. Moreover, governments can enact and enforce comprehensive policies that promote inclusivity and prohibit discrimination, thereby fostering a more equitable society.
Main Body Paragraph 2
On the other hand, those who advocate for familial and charitable responsibility contend that intimate familial relationships facilitate a more nuanced understanding of an individual's needs. Families can provide a supportive and loving environment that is often difficult to replicate in institutional settings. Furthermore, charities frequently excel in delivering targeted, community-based support services. However, it is essential to recognize that charities are often constrained by limited funding and operational capacities, which can result in inconsistent support for disabled individuals.
Opinion Paragraph
In my opinion, while familial and charitable support play vital roles, the primary responsibility for disability support should rest with governments. This is because governments possess the necessary resources and authority to implement comprehensive and sustainable support systems. However, families and charities should be encouraged to complement these efforts, thereby creating a multi-faceted support network that caters to the diverse needs of disabled individuals.
Scoring Breakdown
- Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position throughout the response; presents, extends, and supports main ideas; provides relevant, extended, and supported ideas, but there may be a tendency to overgeneralize.
- Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention; uses paragraphing, but there may be occasional inconsistent paragraphing.
- Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision; uses less common lexis with some awareness of style and collocation, with only very occasional errors in word choice.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms; makes occasional errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely impede communication.
Band 9.0 Answer
Main Body Paragraph 1
The imperative for governments to augment their investment in disability support is underscored by their unique capacity to mobilize substantial resources and enact far-reaching policies. By channeling public funds towards the establishment of specialized institutions and the procurement of cutting-edge assistive technologies, governments can significantly enhance the quality of life for disabled individuals. Furthermore, governmental initiatives aimed at promoting inclusivity and eradicating discriminatory practices are instrumental in cultivating a society that values and respects the rights of all its members. These efforts are often beyond the reach of individual families or charitable organizations, which typically operate with limited financial and operational resources.
Main Body Paragraph 2
Conversely, the proponents of familial and charitable responsibility posit that the intimate bonds shared within families facilitate a more personalized and empathetic care environment. Families, being acutely attuned to the unique needs and preferences of their disabled members, can offer bespoke support that is often difficult to replicate in institutional settings. Additionally, charities frequently excel in delivering targeted, community-based support services that are tailored to the specific needs of local disabled individuals. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the efficacy of these efforts is often constrained by limited funding and operational capacities.
Opinion Paragraph
In my view, while the contributions of families and charities are invaluable, the onus of providing comprehensive and sustainable support for disabled individuals should primarily lie with governments. This is because governments possess the necessary resources, authority, and strategic vision to implement large-scale initiatives that can effect meaningful and enduring change. However, a collaborative approach that integrates the efforts of families, charities, and governments is likely to yield the most holistic and effective support network for disabled individuals.
Scoring Breakdown
- Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position throughout the response; presents, extends, and supports ideas with relevant, extended, and supported ideas.
- Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention; uses paragraphing effectively to organize information logically.
- Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a wide range of vocabulary with high degree of flexibility and precision; uses less common lexis with full awareness of style and collocation; uses idiomatic language naturally.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a wide range of complex sentence forms; makes only very occasional errors in grammar and punctuation, and these do not impede communication.
Key Vocabulary
- Allocate (verb) - to give or assign something to a particular purpose: Governments should allocate more funds to support disabled individuals.
- Comprehensive (adjective) - complete; including all or nearly all elements: The government implemented comprehensive policies to support the disabled community.
- Equitable (adjective) - fair and just: Governmental policies should promote an equitable society where everyone's rights are respected.
- Inclusivity (noun) - the practice of including all individuals, regardless of their differences: Promoting inclusivity is essential for creating a supportive environment for disabled individuals.
- Intimate (adjective) - closely acquainted; familiar: Familial relationships offer an intimate understanding of a disabled individual's needs.
- Mobilize (verb) - to gather and organize resources for a specific purpose: Governments can mobilize substantial resources to support disability initiatives.
- Nuanced (adjective) - having subtle differences or distinctions: Families provide a nuanced understanding of their disabled members' needs.
- Operational (adjective) - relating to the way something is done or operates: Charities often face operational constraints that limit their support capabilities.
- Procure (verb) - to obtain something, especially with care or effort: Governments should procure advanced assistive technologies for disabled individuals.
- Tailored (adjective) - made to fit a particular person or purpose: Charities deliver targeted, tailored support services to local communities.
- Augment (verb) - to make something greater by adding to it: Governments should augment their investment in disability support.
- Bespoke (adjective) - made for a particular customer or user: Families can offer bespoke support that meets the unique needs of their disabled members.
- Cultivating (verb) - to try to develop something: Governmental initiatives aimed at promoting inclusivity are essential for cultivating a supportive society.
- Holistic (adjective) - relating to the whole of something or to the total system rather than to its parts: A holistic approach to disability support integrates the efforts of families, charities, and governments.
- Instrumental (adjective) - very important in achieving a result: Governmental policies are instrumental in fostering an inclusive society.
- Mobilize (verb) - to bring together resources or people for a specific purpose: Governments can mobilize substantial resources to support disability initiatives.
- Sustainable (adjective) - able to be maintained at a certain level without causing harm: Governments should implement sustainable support systems for disabled individuals.
- Tailored (adjective) - made to fit a particular person or purpose: Charities deliver targeted, tailored support services to local communities.
- Underscore (verb) - to emphasize something: The imperative for increased governmental investment in disability support is underscored by their unique capacity to mobilize resources.
- Vision (noun) - the ability to plan for the future with imagination or intelligence: Governments possess the strategic vision to implement large-scale initiatives for disability support.
- Far-reaching (adjective) - having a great effect or influence: Governmental policies can have far-reaching effects on the lives of disabled individuals.
- Procurement (noun) - the action of obtaining something: The procurement of advanced assistive technologies is essential for supporting disabled individuals.
- Substantial (adjective) - of considerable importance, size, or worth: Governments possess substantial resources to support disability initiatives.
- Tailored (adjective) - made to fit a particular person or purpose: Charities deliver targeted, tailored support services to local communities.
- Yield (verb) - to produce or provide something: A collaborative approach is likely to yield the most effective support network for disabled individuals.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Overgeneralizing: Avoid making broad statements without sufficient evidence or examples. For instance, instead of saying "Governments should help disabled people," specify how they can help and provide examples.
- Repetition: Do not repeat the same ideas or phrases excessively. Vary your vocabulary and sentence structures to maintain reader engagement.
- Lack of Cohesion: Ensure that your ideas flow logically from one to the next. Use transition words and phrases to connect your sentences and paragraphs.
- Inadequate Vocabulary: Avoid using simple or repetitive vocabulary. Instead, use a range of words and phrases that are appropriate for an academic essay.
- Grammatical Errors: Pay attention to grammar and punctuation. Common errors include subject-verb agreement, tense consistency, and article usage.
- Ignoring the Task: Make sure you address both sides of the argument and provide a clear opinion. Failing to do so can result in a lower score for Task Response.
- Poor Paragraphing: Use paragraphs to organize your ideas. Each paragraph should focus on one main idea and be supported by relevant examples or evidence.
- Lack of Balance: Ensure that you discuss both views equally before presenting your opinion. Focusing too much on one side can result in an imbalanced essay.
- Insufficient Support: Provide enough evidence to support your ideas. Use examples, statistics, or quotes to strengthen your arguments.
- Informal Language: Avoid using informal language or contractions in your essay. Use formal, academic language appropriate for an IELTS Writing Task 2 essay.
Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol
Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 responses scored by AI on English AIdol, the AI-powered test prep platform that provides instant feedback and personalized study plans.
