IELTS Writing Task 2: Diet And Nutrition (Two Part Question) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

• IELTS Writing Task 2: Juvenile Justice – Band 8.0 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Juvenile Justice - Band 7.0 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Road Safety – Band 8.0 Sample with…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Traffic Congestion - Band 6.5 Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Social Media Influencers - Band 7.0…

The Prompt

Some people believe that governments should regulate what people eat to improve public health. Others argue that individuals should have the freedom to choose their own diets. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Band 6.0 Model Answer

Some people think that governments should control what people eat. Others believe that people should be free to choose their own food. I agree with the second opinion.

There are several reasons why governments might want to regulate diets. First, they could improve public health by reducing obesity and diseases. Second, they could save money on healthcare. For example, in the UK, the government has tried to limit junk food advertising to children. However, I think this is not a good idea. People should have the freedom to choose what they eat. If governments control diets, it could lead to problems. For instance, some people might not like the food that the government chooses. Also, it could be difficult to enforce. In my opinion, education is a better solution. Governments should teach people about healthy eating instead of controlling their diets.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): Presents a position but does not fully extend or support it. (Band 6)
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized but lack clear progression. (Band 6)
• Lexical Resource (LR): Uses some less common vocabulary but makes errors in word choice and collocation. (Band 6)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms but makes frequent grammatical errors. (Band 6)

Band 7.0 Model Answer

The debate over whether governments should regulate diets or leave individuals to make their own choices is contentious. I believe that a balanced approach is necessary.

On one hand, government regulation can have significant benefits. For example, banning trans fats has been shown to reduce heart disease rates. Additionally, governments can use subsidies to make healthy foods more affordable. However, there are also drawbacks. Some people might feel that their personal freedoms are being infringed upon. Moreover, different cultures have different dietary needs, making it difficult for governments to create one-size-fits-all policies. On the other hand, allowing individuals complete freedom can lead to poor health choices. For instance, many people consume too much sugar and salt, leading to obesity and other health issues. In my view, a combination of regulation and education is the best solution. Governments should set basic standards for food safety and nutrition but also provide education to help people make informed choices.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position and extends it with relevant, supported ideas. (Band 7)
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized and connected with clear progression. (Band 7)
• Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey precise meanings. (Band 7)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with some errors. (Band 7)

Band 8.0 Model Answer

The question of whether governments should regulate diets or allow individuals to choose their own food is a complex one, with valid arguments on both sides. I contend that a nuanced approach is necessary.

Proponents of government regulation argue that it can significantly improve public health. For example, the World Health Organization has highlighted the success of sugar taxes in reducing consumption of sugary drinks. Furthermore, governments can use public health campaigns to educate citizens about the benefits of a balanced diet. However, critics point out that excessive regulation can infringe on personal freedoms. For instance, some people might object to the government dictating what they can and cannot eat. Additionally, cultural differences in dietary preferences can make it challenging to implement universal regulations. On the other hand, allowing complete freedom can lead to unhealthy eating habits. For example, the rise of fast food consumption has been linked to increasing rates of obesity and diabetes. In my view, the best approach is a combination of regulation and education. Governments should set clear guidelines for food safety and nutrition but also provide resources to help people make informed choices.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position and extends it with relevant, supported, and extended ideas. (Band 8)
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized and connected with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices. (Band 8)
• Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a wide range of vocabulary to convey precise meanings and sophisticated collocations. (Band 8)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with some errors. (Band 8)

Band 9.0 Model Answer

The contentious issue of whether governments should regulate diets or allow individuals the autonomy to make their own choices warrants a thorough examination of both perspectives. I firmly believe that a balanced approach is the most effective solution.

Advocates for government regulation posit that it can significantly enhance public health outcomes. Empirical evidence from countries like Denmark, which has implemented fat taxes, demonstrates a reduction in the consumption of unhealthy foods. Moreover, governments can leverage public health initiatives to disseminate information about the benefits of a balanced diet. However, detractors argue that such regulations can encroach upon personal liberties. For example, the implementation of a sugar tax in Mexico sparked controversy, with some citizens viewing it as an infringement on their right to choose. Additionally, the cultural diversity of dietary preferences presents a formidable challenge to the implementation of universal regulations. Conversely, the absence of regulation can lead to detrimental health consequences. The proliferation of processed foods, for instance, has been correlated with a surge in obesity rates and chronic diseases. In my view, the optimal approach is a synthesis of regulation and education. Governments should establish clear, evidence-based guidelines for food safety and nutrition while concurrently investing in educational programs to empower individuals to make informed dietary choices.

Scoring Breakdown

• Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position and extends it with relevant, supported, and extended ideas, demonstrating a thorough treatment of the task. (Band 9)
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized and connected with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices, creating a coherent and cohesive response. (Band 9)
• Lexical Resource (LR): Uses a wide range of vocabulary to convey precise meanings and sophisticated collocations, demonstrating a high degree of lexical sophistication. (Band 9)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with a high degree of accuracy and flexibility. (Band 9)

Vocabulary Highlights

1. Contentious (adj.): causing or likely to cause controversy. Example: The issue of diet regulation is contentious.
2. Nuanced (adj.): characterized by subtle differences or distinctions. Example: A nuanced approach is necessary.
3. Proponents (n.): a person who advocates for a cause or proposal. Example: Proponents of government regulation argue that it can improve public health.
4. Empirical (adj.): based on observation or experience rather than theory. Example: Empirical evidence from countries like Denmark.
5. Disseminate (v.): to spread or distribute widely. Example: Governments can disseminate information about healthy eating.
6. Detractors (n.): a person who disparages or belittles. Example: Detractors argue that regulations can infringe on personal liberties.
7. Formidable (adj.): inspiring fear or respect through being impressively large, powerful, intense, or capable. Example: The cultural diversity of dietary preferences presents a formidable challenge.
8. Proliferation (n.): rapid increase in the number or amount of something. Example: The proliferation of processed foods.
9. Correlated (v.): to have a mutual relationship or connection. Example: The consumption of processed foods is correlated with obesity rates.
10. Synthesis (n.): the combination of a number of things in order to form a coherent whole. Example: A synthesis of regulation and education.
11. Evidence-based (adj.): based on or informed by observable, measurable outcomes of practices, programs, or policies. Example: Clear, evidence-based guidelines.
12. Concurrently (adv.): at the same time; simultaneously. Example: Invest in educational programs concurrently.
13. Empower (v.): to give someone the authority or power to do something. Example: Empower individuals to make informed choices.
14. Dietary (adj.): relating to or involving food and its consumption. Example: Dietary preferences.
15. Autonomy (n.): the right or condition of self-government. Example: Allow individuals the autonomy to make their own choices.
16. Enhance (v.): to increase or improve in value, quality, or extent. Example: Enhance public health outcomes.
17. Leverage (v.): to use something to maximum advantage. Example: Governments can leverage public health initiatives.
18. Infringement (n.): an act that violates or transgresses something. Example: An infringement on personal liberties.
19. Chronic (adj.): persisting for a long time or constantly recurring. Example: Chronic diseases.
20. Optimal (adj.): best or most favorable. Example: The optimal approach is a synthesis of regulation and education.

Common Mistakes Students Make

1. Lack of Clear Position: Failing to present a clear position in the introduction and conclusion.
2. Insufficient Support: Not providing enough examples or evidence to support arguments.
3. Poor Organization: Ideas are not logically organized or connected, making the response difficult to follow.
4. Vocabulary Errors: Using incorrect or inappropriate vocabulary, leading to a lower Lexical Resource score.
5. Grammatical Errors: Making frequent grammatical errors, which can significantly impact the Grammatical Range and Accuracy score.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 responses scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to help you improve your score.