IELTS Writing Task 2: Diet And Nutrition Discussion - Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers
Related guides:
The Prompt
Discussion Prompt: Some people believe that governments should play a major role in regulating people's diets to combat obesity and malnutrition. Others argue that individuals should have the freedom to choose their own diets. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Model Answers
Band 6.0 Answer
Scoring Breakdown:
- Task Response (TR): 5.0 - Presents a position but with limited development
- Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 6.0 - Logical but with some unclear progression
- Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 - Adequate range but some errors and repetition
- Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 - Frequent errors affect clarity
Answer:
The government should help people eat healthy because many people are fat. Some people say that the government should not tell people what to eat. I think the government should help because many people don't know how to eat healthy. Fast food is very popular and it is not good for health. The government can make rules about food in schools and restaurants. They can also teach people about healthy food on TV. Some people say that they should choose their own food. This is true but many people make bad choices. The government can help them make better choices. In conclusion, the government should help people eat healthy food.
Band 7.0 Answer
Scoring Breakdown:
- Task Response (TR): 7.0 - Presents a clear position with some development
- Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 7.0 - Logical flow with some unclear transitions
- Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 - Sufficient range but some errors and repetition
- Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 - Some errors but generally clear
Answer:
The role of governments in regulating diets is a contentious issue. On one hand, governments can implement policies to promote healthy eating. For example, they can subsidize fruits and vegetables or tax unhealthy foods. This can help combat obesity and malnutrition. On the other hand, some people argue that individuals should have the freedom to choose their own diets. They believe that personal responsibility is important and that governments should not interfere. In my opinion, governments should play a role in promoting healthy eating, but they should not impose strict regulations. Education and incentives are more effective than strict rules. For instance, schools can teach students about nutrition and restaurants can offer healthy options. In conclusion, a balanced approach is necessary.
Band 8.0 Answer
Scoring Breakdown:
- Task Response (TR): 8.0 - Presents a clear position with thorough development
- Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 8.0 - Logical flow with clear transitions
- Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 - Wide range with some sophisticated vocabulary
- Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 - Few errors and generally clear
Answer:
The debate surrounding government intervention in dietary choices is multifaceted. Proponents of government regulation argue that obesity and malnutrition are significant public health issues that require collective action. Governments can implement policies such as nutrition labeling, subsidies for healthy foods, and restrictions on unhealthy foods. These measures can create an environment that encourages healthier eating habits. Conversely, opponents of government intervention emphasize individual freedom and personal responsibility. They argue that individuals should have the right to choose their own diets and that excessive government regulation can infringe upon personal liberties. In my view, a balanced approach is optimal. Governments should provide education and incentives to promote healthy eating, but they should avoid overly restrictive measures. For example, public awareness campaigns and nutrition education in schools can be effective without compromising personal freedom. In conclusion, a collaborative effort between governments and individuals is essential for addressing dietary issues.
Band 9.0 Answer
Scoring Breakdown:
- Task Response (TR): 9.0 - Presents a clear position with thorough development and insightful analysis
- Coherence & Cohesion (CC): 9.0 - Logical flow with clear transitions and progression
- Lexical Resource (LR): 9.0 - Wide range with sophisticated and precise vocabulary
- Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA): 9.0 - Minimal errors and generally clear
Answer:
The role of governments in regulating diets to combat obesity and malnutrition is a complex and contentious issue. Advocates of government intervention posit that public health crises necessitate collective action. Governments can implement a range of policies, including nutrition labeling, subsidies for healthy foods, and restrictions on unhealthy foods. These measures can create an environment that fosters healthier eating habits and mitigates the prevalence of diet-related illnesses. Conversely, proponents of individual freedom argue that personal responsibility and choice are paramount. They contend that excessive government regulation can infringe upon personal liberties and that individuals should have the autonomy to make their own dietary choices. In my view, a balanced and nuanced approach is optimal. Governments should prioritize education and incentives to promote healthy eating, such as public awareness campaigns and nutrition education in schools. These measures can effectively encourage healthier choices without compromising personal freedom. Additionally, governments can collaborate with the food industry to improve the availability and affordability of healthy foods. In conclusion, a collaborative effort between governments and individuals, grounded in education and incentives, is essential for addressing dietary issues and promoting public health.
Vocabulary Highlights
- Contentious (adj.): Controversial or disputed
- Example: The role of governments in regulating diets is a contentious issue.
- Subsidize (v.): To provide financial support or assistance
- Example: Governments can subsidize fruits and vegetables to make them more affordable.
- Incentives (n.): Measures that encourage or motivate people to do something
- Example: Education and incentives are more effective than strict rules.
- Autonomy (n.): The right or condition of self-government
- Example: Individuals should have the autonomy to make their own dietary choices.
- Mitigate (v.): To make less severe or less intense
- Example: These measures can mitigate the prevalence of diet-related illnesses.
- Proponent (n.): A person who advocates for a particular cause or proposal
- Example: Proponents of individual freedom argue that personal responsibility is important.
- Collaborative (adj.): Involving cooperation or teamwork
- Example: A collaborative effort between governments and individuals is essential.
- Nuanced (adj.): Characterized by subtle distinctions or variations
- Example: A balanced and nuanced approach is optimal.
- Prevalence (n.): The fact or condition of being prevalent or widespread
- Example: These measures can mitigate the prevalence of diet-related illnesses.
- Infringe (v.): To violate or encroach upon something
- Example: Excessive government regulation can infringe upon personal liberties.
- Collective (adj.): Done by people acting as a group
- Example: Public health crises necessitate collective action.
- Paramount (adj.): Above all others in importance
- Example: Personal responsibility and choice are paramount.
- Foster (v.): To encourage or promote the development of something
- Example: These measures can foster healthier eating habits.
- Affordability (n.): The quality of being affordable or within one's financial means
- Example: Governments can improve the affordability of healthy foods.
- Grounded (adj.): Based on or derived from a particular foundation or principle
- Example: A collaborative effort grounded in education and incentives is essential.
- Autonomy (n.): The right or condition of self-government
- Example: Individuals should have the autonomy to make their own dietary choices.
- Incentives (n.): Measures that encourage or motivate people to do something
- Example: Education and incentives are more effective than strict rules.
- Mitigate (v.): To make less severe or less intense
- Example: These measures can mitigate the prevalence of diet-related illnesses.
- Proponent (n.): A person who advocates for a particular cause or proposal
- Example: Proponents of individual freedom argue that personal responsibility is important.
- Collaborative (adj.): Involving cooperation or teamwork
- Example: A collaborative effort between governments and individuals is essential.
- Nuanced (adj.): Characterized by subtle distinctions or variations
- Example: A balanced and nuanced approach is optimal.
- Prevalence (n.): The fact or condition of being prevalent or widespread
- Example: These measures can mitigate the prevalence of diet-related illnesses.
- Infringe (v.): To violate or encroach upon something
- Example: Excessive government regulation can infringe upon personal liberties.
- Collective (adj.): Done by people acting as a group
- Example: Public health crises necessitate collective action.
- Paramount (adj.): Above all others in importance
- Example: Personal responsibility and choice are paramount.
- Foster (v.): To encourage or promote the development of something
- Example: These measures can foster healthier eating habits.
- Affordability (n.): The quality of being affordable or within one's financial means
- Example: Governments can improve the affordability of healthy foods.
- Grounded (adj.): Based on or derived from a particular foundation or principle
- Example: A collaborative effort grounded in education and incentives is essential.
Common Mistakes
- Lack of Clear Position: Many students fail to present a clear position on the issue, resulting in a lower Task Response score.
- Poor Vocabulary Choices: Using repetitive or inappropriate vocabulary can negatively impact the Lexical Resource score.
- Grammatical Errors: Frequent grammatical errors can make the response difficult to understand, affecting the Grammatical Range and Accuracy score.
- Inadequate Development: Providing insufficient development of ideas can result in a lower score for Task Response and Coherence and Cohesion.
- Weak Transitions: Poorly constructed transitions can make the response difficult to follow, impacting the Coherence and Cohesion score.
Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol
Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 responses scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to improve your scores.
