IELTS Writing Task 2: Cycling Infrastructure (Advantages Disadvantages) — Band 6/7/8/9 Model Answers

Related guides:

• IELTS Writing Task 2 Renewable Energy Agree Disagree Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Recycling (Discussion) — Band 6/7/8/9…
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Deforestation Two Part Question Sample…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Climate Change Discussion Sample Band…
• IELTS Writing Task 2: Plastic Pollution (Advantages…

The Prompt (Paraphrased)

Some people believe governments should invest in cycling infrastructure to promote healthier lifestyles. Others argue this is a waste of public funds. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers and Scoring Breakdowns

Band 6.0 Answer

Some people say that governments should build more bicycle paths to help people be healthier. Others think this money could be used better. Both sides have good points, but I think building cycle paths is more important.

Paragraph 1: Some people think that governments should spend money on bicycle infrastructure. They say that this will make people exercise more and be healthier. For example, in cities like Amsterdam, people cycle everywhere and are generally fitter. Also, cycling reduces pollution, which is good for everyone.

Paragraph 2: However, others argue that this money could be spent on other things. They say that not everyone wants to cycle, so it is a waste of money. Also, building cycle paths takes time and can be expensive. Some people think that money should be spent on things like hospitals or schools instead.

Paragraph 3: In my opinion, I think governments should build more cycle paths. This is because the benefits are clear. People will be healthier, and the environment will be cleaner. Also, it encourages people to be more active, which can reduce problems like obesity.

Scoring:

• Task Response: Band 6 (Presents a position but with limited development)
• Cohesion and Cohesion: Band 6 (Uses some connecting words but with some mechanical use)
• Lexical Resource: Band 6 (Attempts a variety of vocabulary but with errors and limited range)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6 (Attempts complex sentences but with frequent errors)

Band 7.0 Answer

The debate over whether governments should invest in cycling infrastructure to promote healthier lifestyles is contentious. While some advocate for this expenditure, others contend it is an inefficient use of public funds. Both perspectives warrant examination.

Paragraph 1: Proponents of cycling infrastructure argue that it encourages physical activity and reduces health issues. For instance, cities with well-developed cycling networks, such as Copenhagen, report lower obesity rates and fewer heart problems. Additionally, cycling reduces traffic congestion and air pollution, benefiting the entire community.

Paragraph 2: Critics, however, assert that investing in cycling infrastructure is a poor use of resources. They point out that not everyone is inclined to cycle, making such investments ineffective for a significant portion of the population. Furthermore, the cost of constructing and maintaining cycle paths could be allocated to other critical areas like healthcare or education.

Paragraph 3: In my view, the advantages of investing in cycling infrastructure outweigh the disadvantages. The long-term health benefits and environmental improvements justify the initial costs. Moreover, promoting cycling can reduce the burden on public healthcare systems by decreasing obesity-related illnesses.

Scoring:

• Task Response: Band 7 (Presents a clear position with some development and extension)
• Cohesion and Cohesion: Band 7 (Uses a mix of cohesive devices effectively but with some inconsistencies)
• Lexical Resource: Band 7 (Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary with some less common lexical items but occasional errors)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 7 (Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with some errors)

Band 8.0 Answer

The proposition that governments should allocate funds to cycling infrastructure to foster healthier lifestyles has sparked considerable debate. While proponents highlight the health and environmental benefits, detractors argue that such investments are fiscally irresponsible. A balanced analysis reveals compelling arguments on both sides.

Paragraph 1: Advocates for cycling infrastructure contend that it promotes physical activity, which is crucial for combating sedentary lifestyles. Cities like Amsterdam and Portland have demonstrated that extensive cycling networks correlate with lower obesity rates and improved cardiovascular health. Furthermore, cycling reduces carbon emissions, mitigating the impact of climate change and enhancing urban air quality.

Paragraph 2: Conversely, opponents of this investment posit that it diverts funds from more pressing needs. They argue that not all citizens will utilize cycling infrastructure, rendering it an inefficient allocation of resources. Additionally, the initial costs of construction and ongoing maintenance could be better directed toward education, healthcare, or public transportation systems that serve a broader demographic.

Paragraph 3: In my opinion, the benefits of investing in cycling infrastructure are substantial and multifaceted. The long-term health advantages, coupled with environmental sustainability, justify the expenditure. Governments should prioritize initiatives that promote active lifestyles, as these investments yield significant returns in public health and environmental conservation.

Scoring:

• Task Response: Band 8 (Presents a clear position with thorough development and extension)
• Cohesion and Cohesion: Band 8 (Uses a wide range of cohesive devices effectively)
• Lexical Resource: Band 8 (Uses a wide range of vocabulary with some less common lexical items used appropriately)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 8 (Uses a wide range of complex sentence forms with frequent error-free sentences)

Band 9.0 Answer

The allocation of public funds to cycling infrastructure as a means to promote healthier lifestyles has become a contentious issue. While some advocate for this investment due to its health and environmental benefits, others contend that it is an inefficient use of limited resources. A critical examination of both perspectives is essential.

Paragraph 1: Proponents of cycling infrastructure argue that it encourages physical activity, which is instrumental in combating the global obesity epidemic. Cities such as Copenhagen and Utrecht have successfully implemented extensive cycling networks, resulting in lower rates of chronic diseases and improved overall public health. Additionally, cycling reduces traffic congestion and air pollution, contributing to cleaner and more livable urban environments.

Paragraph 2: Critics, however, assert that investing in cycling infrastructure is a misallocation of public funds. They argue that not all citizens will utilize these facilities, rendering the investment ineffective for a significant portion of the population. Furthermore, the substantial costs associated with construction and maintenance could be better directed toward critical sectors such as education, healthcare, or public transportation, which have a broader impact on society.

Paragraph 3: In my view, the advantages of investing in cycling infrastructure are manifold and justify the expenditure. The long-term health benefits, coupled with environmental sustainability, make it a prudent investment. Governments should prioritize initiatives that promote active lifestyles, as these investments yield significant returns in public health and environmental conservation. By allocating funds to cycling infrastructure, policymakers can create healthier, more sustainable communities that benefit current and future generations.

Scoring:

• Task Response: Band 9 (Presents a clear position with thorough, relevant, and extended development)
• Cohesion and Cohesion: Band 9 (Uses a wide range of cohesive devices with precision and flexibility)
• Lexical Resource: Band 9 (Uses a wide range of vocabulary with full flexibility and precision, including less common lexical items)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 9 (Uses a wide range of complex sentence forms with full flexibility and accuracy)

Vocabulary Highlights

1. Contentious (adj.) – Controversial; causing disagreement. Example: The issue of cycling infrastructure is highly contentious among policymakers.
2. Allocate (v.) – To distribute resources for a specific purpose. Example: Governments must allocate funds wisely to maximize public benefits.
3. Combat (v.) – To take action to reduce or prevent something. Example: Cycling infrastructure helps combat sedentary lifestyles.
4. Correlate (v.) – To have a mutual relationship or connection. Example: Extensive cycling networks correlate with lower obesity rates.
5. Mitigate (v.) – To make less severe, serious, or painful. Example: Cycling reduces carbon emissions, mitigating climate change.
6. Fiscally (adv.) – Relating to government revenue, especially taxes. Example: Critics argue that investing in cycling is fiscally irresponsible.
7. Divert (v.) – To turn aside or away from a path or course. Example: Funds are diverted from healthcare to less critical projects.
8. Substantial (adj.) – Considerable in importance, size, or extent. Example: The benefits of cycling infrastructure are substantial.
9. Instrumental (adj.) – Serving as a means of achieving a purpose or result. Example: Cycling is instrumental in promoting physical activity.
10. Instrumental (adj.) – Serving as a means of achieving a purpose or result. Example: Cycling is instrumental in promoting physical activity.
11. Chronic (adj.) – Persisting for a long time or constantly recurring. Example: Cities with cycling networks report lower rates of chronic diseases.
12. Livable (adj.) – Suitable or comfortable for living in. Example: Cycling contributes to cleaner, more livable urban environments.
13. Misallocation (n.) – The act of allocating something in a wrong or inefficient way. Example: Critics argue that investing in cycling is a misallocation of funds.
14. Substantial (adj.) – Considerable in importance, size, or extent. Example: The benefits of cycling infrastructure are substantial.
15. Pruedent (adj.) – Acting with or showing care and thought for the future. Example: Investing in cycling infrastructure is a prudent decision.
16. Policymakers (n.) – People who are responsible for making decisions about public policy. Example: Policymakers should prioritize initiatives that promote active lifestyles.
17. Sustainability (n.) – The ability to be maintained at a certain rate or level without depleting natural resources. Example: Cycling promotes environmental sustainability.
18. Expenditure (n.) – The act of spending money. Example: The expenditure on cycling infrastructure is justified by its benefits.
19. Instrumental (adj.) – Serving as a means of achieving a purpose or result. Example: Cycling is instrumental in promoting physical activity.
20. Contentious (adj.) – Controversial; causing disagreement. Example: The issue of cycling infrastructure is highly contentious among policymakers.

Common Mistakes Students Make

1. Lack of Clear Position: Many students fail to present a clear opinion, resulting in a lower Task Response score. Always state your position explicitly in the introduction and conclusion.
2. Insufficient Development: Some answers present ideas but do not develop them adequately. Use examples, data, or explanations to support your points.
3. Overuse of Simple Sentences: Complex sentences demonstrate a higher level of language proficiency. Practice using a variety of sentence structures to improve your Grammatical Range and Accuracy score.
4. Inconsistent Cohesion: Some students use cohesive devices mechanically or inconsistently. Ensure that your ideas flow logically and that your transitions are smooth.
5. Limited Vocabulary: Using a narrow range of vocabulary can lower your Lexical Resource score. Expand your vocabulary by learning synonyms and less common lexical items.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect! Submit your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response to our AI scoring system and get detailed feedback on how to improve your score. Join thousands of successful test-takers who have used English AIdol to achieve their target bands.