AI-powered learning English

English guide

IELTS Writing Task 2:
Competition Vs Cooperation - Band 7.5 Sample with Full Breakdown

Get a Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer on competition vs cooperation. Full scoring breakdown, vocabulary, and expert analysis.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Competition Vs Cooperation - Band 7.5 Sample with Full Breakdown | English AIdol Blog

What this guide covers

Search answer

What this page helps you decide

Get a Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer on competition vs cooperation. Full scoring breakdown, vocabulary, and expert analysis.

Focus Quick answer
Includes 2026 update
Best for Practical checklist
Next step Related practice
  1. Scan the direct answer first.
  2. Check examples or score rules.
  3. Open the related practice page.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Competition Vs Cooperation - Band 7.5 Sample with Full Breakdown

Related guides:

The Prompt

Some people believe that competition is the best way to succeed in life, while others argue that cooperation is more effective. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

Competition and cooperation are two different ways to achieve success. Some people think that competition is the best way to succeed, while others believe that cooperation is more effective.

Competition can motivate people to work harder and achieve their goals. For example, in sports, athletes compete to win medals and set records. This drive to be the best can push them to train harder and improve their skills. However, competition can also have negative effects. It can create stress and tension, and sometimes people may use unfair methods to win.

On the other hand, cooperation can lead to better results. When people work together, they can share ideas and support each other. For instance, in team projects at school or work, cooperation helps to complete tasks more efficiently. However, cooperation may not always be effective if people do not communicate well or have different goals.

In my opinion, both competition and cooperation have their advantages and disadvantages. It depends on the situation. For example, competition is good in sports, but cooperation is better in team projects.

Band 7.0 Answer

The debate between competition and cooperation as the optimal path to success is a contentious one. Proponents of competition argue that it drives innovation and personal growth, while advocates for cooperation contend that collective effort yields superior outcomes.

Competition, undeniably, fuels progress. In the corporate world, for instance, companies vie for market dominance, leading to advancements in technology and services. This rivalry can spur individuals to surpass their limits, as seen in academic settings where students strive for top grades. However, competition can foster a cutthroat environment, potentially harming mental health and promoting unethical behavior.

Conversely, cooperation fosters a supportive atmosphere. In collaborative projects, diverse skills and perspectives converge, often resulting in more comprehensive solutions. For example, open-source software development thrives on the collective input of global contributors. Yet, cooperation requires effective communication and shared goals, which can be challenging to maintain.

In my view, the ideal approach hinges on the context. Competition excels in individualistic pursuits, while cooperation shines in collective endeavors. A balanced blend of both, tailored to the situation, is likely the most effective strategy.

Band 7.5 Answer

The dichotomy between competition and cooperation as catalysts for success is a nuanced one, with compelling arguments on both sides. While competition is often lauded for its ability to drive ambition, cooperation is equally praised for its capacity to foster collective achievement.

Competition, as a motivator, is unparalleled. In the realm of athletics, the pursuit of victory propels athletes to train rigorously and push their physical limits. Similarly, in the academic sphere, the desire to outperform peers can inspire students to delve deeper into their studies. However, this relentless pursuit of success can sometimes lead to unhealthy levels of stress and anxiety, as well as unethical practices to gain an edge.

On the other hand, cooperation harnesses the power of collective effort. In the workplace, teams that collaborate effectively can tackle complex problems more efficiently than individuals working in isolation. For instance, the development of the COVID-19 vaccines was a testament to global cooperation, with scientists and researchers from around the world working together to achieve a common goal. Nevertheless, cooperation requires a high degree of communication and mutual respect, which can be challenging to sustain.

In my opinion, the most effective approach is a synthesis of both competition and cooperation. In individualistic pursuits, such as sports or academic achievements, competition can be a powerful motivator. However, in collective endeavors, like team projects or global challenges, cooperation is indispensable. By striking a balance between the two, we can maximize our potential for success.

Band 8.0 Answer

The interplay between competition and cooperation in the pursuit of success is a complex and multifaceted issue, with each approach offering distinct advantages and drawbacks. While competition is often heralded as the engine of progress, cooperation is increasingly recognized as a catalyst for collective achievement.

Competition, as a driving force, is undeniably potent. In the corporate landscape, the rivalry between companies fuels innovation and drives economic growth. For example, the tech industry's rapid advancements can be attributed to the fierce competition among giants like Apple, Google, and Microsoft. This competitive spirit can also inspire individuals to strive for excellence, as seen in the academic world where students compete for top honors. However, the pressure to succeed can sometimes lead to burnout and unethical behavior, such as cheating or sabotage.

Conversely, cooperation embodies the power of unity. In scientific research, collaborative efforts often yield groundbreaking discoveries. The Human Genome Project, for instance, was a monumental achievement made possible by the cooperation of thousands of researchers worldwide. Similarly, in the arts, collaborative projects can result in innovative and inspiring works. Yet, cooperation demands a high level of trust and effective communication, which can be challenging to establish and maintain.

In my view, the optimal strategy is a dynamic interplay of competition and cooperation. In individualistic pursuits, competition can be a powerful motivator. However, in collective endeavors, cooperation is essential. By integrating both approaches, we can harness their respective strengths and mitigate their weaknesses, ultimately enhancing our potential for success.

Scoring Breakdown

Band 6.0 Answer

  • Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position but lacks depth and development. Ideas are somewhat repetitive.
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized but with limited use of cohesive devices.
  • Lexical Resource (LR): Vocabulary is adequate but lacks sophistication. Some errors in word choice and collocation.
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Sentence structures are simple with some errors in grammar and punctuation.

Band 7.0 Answer

  • Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with some development. Ideas are logically connected but could be more detailed.
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are well-organized with a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. Cohesive devices are used effectively.
  • Lexical Resource (LR): Vocabulary is varied and appropriate. Some sophisticated words are used accurately.
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Sentence structures are varied with a few errors in grammar and punctuation.

Band 7.5 Answer

  • Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with logical development. Ideas are well-supported with relevant examples.
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized with a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. Cohesive devices are used effectively.
  • Lexical Resource (LR): Vocabulary is varied and sophisticated. Words are used accurately with some errors in collocation.
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Sentence structures are varied with a few errors in grammar and punctuation.

Band 8.0 Answer

  • Task Response (TR): Presents a clear position with thorough development. Ideas are well-supported with relevant and specific examples.
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): Ideas are logically organized with a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. Cohesive devices are used effectively.
  • Lexical Resource (LR): Vocabulary is varied and sophisticated. Words are used accurately with minimal errors in collocation.
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): Sentence structures are varied with minimal errors in grammar and punctuation.

Vocabulary Highlights

  1. Dichotomy: A division or contrast between two things. Example: The dichotomy between competition and cooperation is evident in team sports.
  2. Catalyst: A person or event that quickly speeds up a process or reaction. Example: Competition can act as a catalyst for innovation.
  3. Proponents: People who support or advocate for a particular idea or cause. Example: Proponents of cooperation argue that it fosters a supportive atmosphere.
  4. Collective: Done by people acting as a group. Example: Collective effort can lead to better results.
  5. Converge: To come together from different directions. Example: In collaborative projects, diverse skills and perspectives converge.
  6. Tailored: Made or adapted for a particular purpose or person. Example: A balanced blend of both competition and cooperation is tailored to the situation.
  7. Relentless: Continuing without pause or rest. Example: The relentless pursuit of success can lead to unhealthy levels of stress.
  8. Indispensable: Absolutely necessary. Example: Cooperation is indispensable in collective endeavors.
  9. Synthesis: The combination of a number of things into a whole. Example: The most effective approach is a synthesis of both competition and cooperation.
  10. Potent: Having great power, influence, or effect. Example: Competition, as a driving force, is undeniably potent.
  11. Heralded: To announce or indicate something, especially the approach of a significant or imminent event. Example: Competition is often heralded as the engine of progress.
  12. Fierce: Showing a heartfelt and powerful intensity. Example: The tech industry's rapid advancements can be attributed to the fierce competition among giants.
  13. Burnout: Physical or mental collapse caused by overwork or stress. Example: The pressure to succeed can sometimes lead to burnout.
  14. Sabotage: Deliberately destroy, damage, or obstruct something. Example: Unethical behavior, such as cheating or sabotage, can result from competition.
  15. Unity: The state of being united or joined as a whole. Example: Cooperation embodies the power of unity.
  16. Trust: Firm belief in the reliability, truth, ability, or strength of someone or something. Example: Cooperation demands a high level of trust.
  17. Dynamic: Characterized by constant change, activity, or progress. Example: The optimal strategy is a dynamic interplay of competition and cooperation.
  18. Harness: To control and use something, especially natural forces or resources, in a way that benefits humankind. Example: By integrating both approaches, we can harness their respective strengths.
  19. Mitigate: To make something less severe, violent, or painful. Example: By integrating both approaches, we can mitigate their weaknesses.
  20. Potential: Having or showing the capacity to develop into something in the future. Example: By integrating both approaches, we can enhance our potential for success.

Common Mistakes

  1. Lack of Depth: Many students present a clear position but fail to develop their ideas thoroughly. They often provide only one or two examples and do not explore the nuances of the topic.
  2. Repetitive Ideas: Some students repeat the same ideas in different paragraphs without adding new information or perspectives. This makes their essays seem shallow and unengaging.
  3. Poor Vocabulary: Students often use basic vocabulary and fail to incorporate sophisticated words. This limits their ability to express complex ideas and can result in lower scores for Lexical Resource.
  4. Grammatical Errors: Many students make errors in grammar and punctuation, which can detract from the overall quality of their writing. Common mistakes include subject-verb agreement errors, incorrect use of tenses, and missing commas.
  5. Lack of Cohesion: Some students struggle to connect their ideas logically. They may use cohesive devices incorrectly or not at all, making their essays difficult to follow.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Ready to see how you measure up? Get your own response scored by AI on English AIdol. Our advanced AI provides instant feedback and personalized tips to help you improve your writing skills and achieve your target band score.