English guide
Explore Band 6, 7, 8, and 9 model answers for IELTS Writing Task 2 on automation and jobs. Learn key strategies for high scores.
What this guide covers
Search answer
Explore Band 6, 7, 8, and 9 model answers for IELTS Writing Task 2 on automation and jobs. Learn key strategies for high scores.
Related guides:
Alfie Lim, TESOL-certified English educator, English AIdol
Some people believe that automation and artificial intelligence will create more jobs than they displace. Others argue that automation will lead to significant job losses. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Scoring Breakdown
Answer
Automation and AI are changing jobs. Some people say it will make more jobs. Others say it will take jobs away. I think both are true.
On one hand, automation can create jobs. For example, robots need people to fix them. Also, new jobs like AI trainers are appearing. This is good because it gives people work.
On the other hand, automation can take jobs. Factories use robots instead of people. Drivers might lose jobs to self-driving cars. This is bad because people need jobs to live.
In my opinion, automation will create more jobs than it takes. But we need to help people who lose jobs. Governments should give training for new jobs. This way, everyone can benefit from automation.
Scoring Breakdown
Answer
The impact of automation and AI on jobs is a hot topic. Some argue that these technologies will generate more employment opportunities, while others contend that they will result in significant job losses. I believe that while automation may displace some jobs, it will ultimately create more.
Proponents of automation argue that it will create new jobs. For instance, the rise of AI has led to the creation of jobs such as AI trainers and data analysts. Additionally, automation can increase productivity, leading to economic growth and more job opportunities. Moreover, automation can reduce the need for dangerous or repetitive jobs, improving working conditions.
However, critics point out that automation can lead to job losses. For example, self-driving cars could replace millions of drivers. Similarly, automated factories can operate with fewer workers. This can lead to unemployment and economic inequality.
In my view, the benefits of automation outweigh the drawbacks. Governments and businesses should invest in education and training to help workers adapt to the changing job market. This way, everyone can benefit from the advancements in technology.
Scoring Breakdown
Answer
The debate surrounding the impact of automation and AI on employment is multifaceted. While some advocate that these technological advancements will engender more job opportunities, others contend that they will precipitate significant job losses. I am inclined to believe that automation will ultimately create more jobs than it displaces.
Advocates of automation posit that it will engender new employment opportunities. For example, the proliferation of AI has led to the creation of jobs such as AI trainers, data scientists, and robotics engineers. Furthermore, automation can enhance productivity, leading to economic growth and the creation of ancillary jobs. Additionally, automation can mitigate the need for hazardous or monotonous jobs, thereby improving working conditions and job satisfaction.
Conversely, detractors argue that automation can result in job losses. For instance, self-driving vehicles could render millions of drivers obsolete. Similarly, automated manufacturing plants can operate with a skeletal workforce. This can exacerbate unemployment and economic disparity, particularly in sectors that are heavily reliant on manual labor.
In my view, the benefits of automation outweigh the drawbacks. Governments and corporations should invest in education and vocational training to equip workers with the skills necessary to thrive in the evolving job market. By doing so, we can ensure that the benefits of automation are equitably distributed.
Scoring Breakdown
Answer
The impact of automation and AI on employment is a contentious issue. While some assert that these technological advancements will engender a plethora of job opportunities, others contend that they will precipitate significant job losses. I am inclined to believe that automation will ultimately create more jobs than it displaces, provided that appropriate measures are taken to mitigate its adverse effects.
Proponents of automation argue that it will engender new employment opportunities. For example, the proliferation of AI has led to the creation of jobs such as AI trainers, data scientists, and robotics engineers. Furthermore, automation can enhance productivity, leading to economic growth and the creation of ancillary jobs. Additionally, automation can mitigate the need for hazardous or monotonous jobs, thereby improving working conditions and job satisfaction.
However, critics posit that automation can result in job losses. For instance, self-driving vehicles could render millions of drivers obsolete. Similarly, automated manufacturing plants can operate with a skeletal workforce. This can exacerbate unemployment and economic disparity, particularly in sectors that are heavily reliant on manual labor. Moreover, the transition to an automated workforce can be disruptive, leading to social and economic instability.
In my view, the benefits of automation outweigh the drawbacks. Governments and corporations should invest in education and vocational training to equip workers with the skills necessary to thrive in the evolving job market. By doing so, we can ensure that the benefits of automation are equitably distributed. Additionally, policies should be implemented to support workers who are displaced by automation, such as unemployment benefits and retraining programs. This way, we can harness the potential of automation while minimizing its adverse effects.