English guide
Get a Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample on air pollution with scoring breakdown, vocabulary, and common mistakes to avoid. Master Task 2 today!
What this guide covers
Search answer
Get a Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample on air pollution with scoring breakdown, vocabulary, and common mistakes to avoid. Master Task 2 today!
Related guides:
Some people believe that environmental problems should be addressed by individuals, while others think that governments and large corporations should take responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Scoring Breakdown:
Answer:
Air pollution is very serious problem in many countries. Some people say that individuals should solve this, while others think governments and big companies should be responsible.
On one hand, individuals can do some things. They can use public transport instead of cars, which makes less pollution. Also, they can turn off lights when not needed. These small actions can help the environment. However, not everyone knows about these things or cares enough to do them.
On the other hand, governments and corporations have more power. Governments can make laws to control pollution, like taxing factories that pollute too much. Big companies can spend money on new technology to make less pollution. They have more money and resources than individuals.
In my opinion, both should work together. Individuals can start by changing their habits, and governments and companies can support them with better laws and technology. This way, air pollution can be reduced more quickly.
Scoring Breakdown:
Answer:
The issue of air pollution has become a pressing concern in many parts of the world. While some argue that individuals should take responsibility for addressing this problem, others believe that governments and large corporations should bear the burden.
Those who advocate for individual responsibility point out that small changes in daily habits can make a significant difference. For instance, using reusable bags instead of plastic ones, reducing water consumption, and opting for energy-efficient appliances can all contribute to a cleaner environment. Moreover, individuals can influence others by setting a good example and promoting sustainable practices within their communities. However, it is important to note that the impact of these individual actions may be limited without broader systemic changes.
On the other hand, proponents of government and corporate responsibility argue that these entities have the resources and influence to enact meaningful change. Governments can implement policies and regulations that encourage businesses to adopt cleaner technologies and reduce emissions. Large corporations, with their substantial financial resources, can invest in research and development of environmentally friendly solutions. Furthermore, they can set an example for smaller businesses and consumers to follow. Nevertheless, relying solely on governments and corporations may lead to a lack of accountability and delayed action.
In my view, a combination of individual efforts and systemic changes is necessary to effectively tackle air pollution. While individuals can make a difference through their daily choices, governments and corporations must take the lead in implementing large-scale solutions. By working together, we can create a more sustainable future for all.
Scoring Breakdown:
Answer:
Air pollution has emerged as one of the most critical environmental challenges of our time, prompting a debate on who should take responsibility for addressing it. While some contend that individuals should be primarily accountable, others argue that governments and corporations must shoulder this responsibility.
Proponents of individual responsibility highlight the power of personal choices in mitigating air pollution. By adopting eco-friendly practices such as carpooling, using energy-efficient devices, and reducing waste, individuals can significantly decrease their carbon footprint. Furthermore, collective action through community initiatives and advocacy can amplify the impact of these efforts. However, critics argue that relying solely on individual actions may not be sufficient to address the scale and complexity of the problem.
Conversely, those who advocate for government and corporate responsibility emphasize the need for systematic changes. Governments can enact and enforce regulations that limit emissions, promote renewable energy, and incentivize sustainable practices. Large corporations, with their extensive resources and influence, can invest in clean technologies, reduce their environmental impact, and set industry standards. Nevertheless, the slow pace of policy implementation and corporate accountability issues can hinder progress.
In my opinion, a collaborative approach is essential to effectively combat air pollution. Individuals should continue to adopt sustainable practices and advocate for change, while governments and corporations must take decisive action to implement and support these efforts. By combining individual responsibility with systemic changes, we can make significant strides in reducing air pollution and creating a healthier environment for future generations.
Scoring Breakdown:
Answer:
The pervasive issue of air pollution has sparked a contentious debate regarding the primary stakeholders responsible for its mitigation. While some assert that individuals should take the lead in addressing this environmental scourge, others contend that governments and corporations must assume greater responsibility.
Advocates for individual responsibility argue that personal choices can collectively make a substantial impact. For instance, opting for public transportation, reducing energy consumption, and minimizing waste can significantly lower one's carbon footprint. Furthermore, individuals can influence their social networks and communities to adopt similar practices, creating a ripple effect of positive change. However, skeptics point out that the scale of the problem may outweigh the collective impact of individual actions.
Conversely, proponents of government and corporate responsibility emphasize the need for policy interventions and institutional changes. Governments can implement stringent regulations on industrial emissions, invest in renewable energy infrastructure, and promote public awareness campaigns. Corporations, with their vast resources, can pioneer innovative technologies, adopt sustainable business practices, and drive market trends towards environmental responsibility. Nevertheless, the political and economic complexities often impede swift and effective action.
In my view, a multifaceted approach is indispensable for tackling air pollution. Individuals should continue to embrace sustainable lifestyles and advocate for change, while governments and corporations must enact and support comprehensive policies and initiatives. By fostering a collaborative effort, we can not only mitigate the adverse effects of air pollution but also pave the way for a more sustainable and equitable future.
Want to know your IELTS Writing Task 2 score? Get your own response scored by AI on English AIdol. Upload your essay and receive an instant score breakdown with personalized feedback.