English guide
Master IELTS Writing Task 1 table responses with expert-crafted samples across Bands 6-9. Learn key strategies for high scores with detailed scoring breakdowns.
What this guide covers
Search answer
Master IELTS Writing Task 1 table responses with expert-crafted samples across Bands 6-9. Learn key strategies for high scores with detailed scoring breakdowns.
Related guides:
The table below shows the percentage of different age groups in two cities, City A and City B, in 1990, 2000, and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table presents data about the percentage of different age groups in City A and City B for the years 1990, 2000, and 2010.
In general, we can observe that the percentage of young people decreased in both cities over this period, while the percentage of older people increased. In City A, the proportion of people aged under 20 fell from 30% in 1990 to 25% in 2010, while the proportion of people aged over 60 rose from 15% to 20%. In City B, the proportion of people aged under 20 dropped from 35% to 30%, and the proportion of people aged over 60 increased from 10% to 15%.
On the other hand, the percentage of people aged 20-39 remained relatively stable in both cities, with a slight decrease in City A and a slight increase in City B. The percentage of people aged 40-59 showed a small increase in both cities, from 25% to 28% in City A and from 20% to 23% in City B.
In conclusion, the data shows that both cities experienced a similar trend of aging population over the 20-year period.
The table illustrates the distribution of age groups in City A and City B across three decades: 1990, 2000, and 2010.
Overall, it is evident that both cities saw a decline in the percentage of young people (under 20) and an increase in the elderly population (over 60). In City A, the proportion of young people decreased by 5% from 1990 to 2010, while the elderly population grew by 5%. Similarly, in City B, the young population shrank by 5%, and the elderly population expanded by 5%.
For the 20-39 age group, City A experienced a minor reduction from 35% to 33%, whereas City B witnessed a slight rise from 30% to 32%. The 40-59 age group saw a modest increase in both cities, with City A rising from 25% to 28% and City B from 20% to 23%.
Notably, City A had a higher percentage of elderly people compared to City B in all three years, while City B consistently had a larger young population. This suggests differing demographic trends between the two cities.
The table compares the percentage distribution of various age groups in City A and City B over three decades: 1990, 2000, and 2010.
A striking trend is the aging population in both cities. In City A, the proportion of individuals under 20 years decreased significantly from 30% in 1990 to 25% in 2010, while those over 60 years increased from 15% to 20%. Similarly, City B experienced a decline in the young population from 35% to 30% and an increase in the elderly population from 10% to 15%.
The working-age population (20-39 years) remained relatively stable in City A, with a slight decrease from 35% to 33%. In contrast, City B saw a marginal increase from 30% to 32%. The 40-59 age group experienced a modest rise in both cities, with City A increasing from 25% to 28% and City B from 20% to 23%.
A notable pattern is that City A consistently had a higher elderly population compared to City B, while City B maintained a larger young population. This indicates that City A may be experiencing faster aging trends than City B.
The table presents the demographic distribution of age groups in City A and City B across three decades: 1990, 2000, and 2010, revealing significant trends in population aging.
The most prominent feature is the consistent decline in the percentage of individuals under 20 years in both cities. City A saw a reduction from 30% to 25%, while City B experienced a decrease from 35% to 30%. Conversely, the elderly population (over 60 years) increased notably, rising from 15% to 20% in City A and from 10% to 15% in City B. This suggests a shift towards an older demographic in both cities.
The working-age population (20-39 years) exhibited stability in City A, with a minor decrease from 35% to 33%, whereas City B saw a slight increase from 30% to 32%. The 40-59 age group experienced a modest growth in both cities, with City A increasing from 25% to 28% and City B from 20% to 23%.
A critical observation is that City A had a higher elderly population compared to City B throughout the period, while City B maintained a larger young population. This discrepancy may reflect differing socio-economic factors influencing demographic trends in each city.
Task Response: The answer presents a clear overview and main trends but lacks depth in analysis. Some comparisons are made, but they are not fully developed.
Coherence and Cohesion: The information is logically organized, but the use of cohesive devices is limited. Some sentences are awkwardly constructed.
Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is adequate but somewhat repetitive. There is a lack of sophistication in word choice.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The grammar is generally accurate but includes some errors. Sentence structures are simple and could be more varied.
Task Response: The answer provides a clear overview and identifies main trends. Comparisons are made, and the response is well-developed.
Coherence and Cohesion: The information is logically organized with effective use of cohesive devices. The response is easy to follow.
Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is varied and appropriate. There is some sophistication in word choice.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The grammar is generally accurate with a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. Some minor errors are present.
Task Response: The answer presents a clear overview and identifies main trends with detailed analysis. Comparisons are thoroughly developed.
Coherence and Cohesion: The information is logically organized with effective use of cohesive devices. The response is well-structured and easy to follow.
Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is varied and sophisticated. There is a wide range of appropriate word choices.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The grammar is generally accurate with a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. Only minor errors are present.
Task Response: The answer presents a clear overview and identifies main trends with thorough analysis. Comparisons are fully developed and insightful.
Coherence and Cohesion: The information is logically organized with effective use of cohesive devices. The response is well-structured and easy to follow.
Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is varied and sophisticated. There is a wide range of appropriate and precise word choices.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The grammar is generally accurate with a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. Only minor errors are present.
Practice makes perfect. Submit your own IELTS Writing Task 1 response to our AI scoring system and get detailed feedback on how to improve your score. Start practicing today!