English guide
IELTS Writing Task 2の「Wildlife Conservation」テーマでBand 6/7/8/9のサンプルエッセイを提示。各バンドの特徴とスコアリングのポイントを詳細に分析。高得点を目指すための具体的なアドバイスを提供。
What this guide covers
Search answer
IELTS Writing Task 2の「Wildlife Conservation」テーマでBand 6/7/8/9のサンプルエッセイを提示。各バンドの特徴とスコアリングのポイントを詳細に分析。高得点を目指すための具体的なアドバイスを提供。
課題文:
> Some people argue that wildlife conservation is a waste of money and resources. Others believe that it is essential for the future of our planet. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
エッセイ:
Some people think that wildlife conservation is not important. They say that we should spend money on other things like education or health. However, I think that wildlife conservation is very important.
There are several reasons why people think conservation is a waste of money. First, they say that animals are not as important as humans. Second, they believe that we can use the money for other things. For example, some people think that we should spend more money on hospitals or schools.
On the other hand, I believe that wildlife conservation is essential. First, animals are part of our ecosystem. If we lose them, it will affect us. Second, many animals are endangered. If we do not protect them, they will disappear forever.
In conclusion, I think that wildlife conservation is important. We should spend money on it because it will help us in the future.
スコアリングのポイント:
エッセイ:
The issue of wildlife conservation has been a topic of debate for many years. While some argue that it is a waste of money and resources, others believe it is crucial for the future of our planet. This essay will discuss both views.
On one hand, those who oppose wildlife conservation argue that the money spent on it could be better used elsewhere. They point out that human needs, such as education and healthcare, are more pressing. Additionally, they believe that wildlife conservation efforts are often ineffective and do not achieve their goals. For instance, some conservation programs have failed to prevent the extinction of certain species.
On the other hand, supporters of wildlife conservation argue that it is essential for maintaining the balance of ecosystems. They contend that the loss of even one species can have a ripple effect on the entire ecosystem. Furthermore, many endangered species play crucial roles in their habitats, and their extinction could lead to the collapse of entire ecosystems. For example, the extinction of bees could have devastating effects on agriculture.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides, I believe that wildlife conservation is crucial. The benefits of preserving biodiversity far outweigh the costs, and we have a moral responsibility to protect the planet's wildlife.
スコアリングのポイント:
エッセイ:
The debate surrounding wildlife conservation has intensified in recent years, with proponents and opponents presenting compelling arguments. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting a personal stance.
Opponents of wildlife conservation often cite economic considerations as their primary concern. They argue that the funds allocated to conservation efforts could be more effectively utilized in other areas, such as healthcare or education. Moreover, they contend that many conservation programs are ineffectual, failing to achieve their intended objectives. For example, despite significant investments, several species continue to face the threat of extinction.
Conversely, advocates for wildlife conservation emphasize the ecological importance of preserving biodiversity. They assert that each species plays a vital role in maintaining the balance of ecosystems. The loss of a single species can trigger a chain reaction, leading to the collapse of entire ecosystems. For instance, the decline of predator populations can result in an overpopulation of prey species, which in turn can deplete their food sources and disrupt the ecological balance.
In my view, the benefits of wildlife conservation are manifold. Beyond the ecological advantages, there are also economic and ethical considerations. Ecotourism, for example, generates substantial revenue and employment opportunities. Furthermore, we have a moral obligation to protect the planet's wildlife, as we are the primary cause of their decline.
スコアリングのポイント:
エッセイ:
The contentious issue of wildlife conservation has garnered significant attention in recent years, with proponents and detractors presenting persuasive arguments. This discourse will delve into both viewpoints before advocating a personal stance.
Those who oppose wildlife conservation often highlight the economic implications of such endeavors. They posit that the financial resources allocated to conservation could be more judiciously employed in other sectors, such as healthcare or education. Additionally, they argue that many conservation initiatives are inefficacious, failing to achieve their intended outcomes. For instance, despite considerable investments, several species remain on the brink of extinction.
Conversely, proponents of wildlife conservation underscore the ecological significance of preserving biodiversity. They contend that each species fulfills a crucial role in maintaining the equilibrium of ecosystems. The extinction of a single species can precipitate a domino effect, leading to the collapse of entire ecosystems. For example, the decimation of apex predators can result in the overpopulation of prey species, which in turn can exhaust their food sources and disrupt the ecological balance.
In my opinion, the advantages of wildlife conservation are multifaceted. Apart from the ecological benefits, there are also economic and ethical considerations. Ecotourism, for instance, generates substantial revenue and employment opportunities. Moreover, we have a moral imperative to safeguard the planet's wildlife, as we are the primary architects of their decline.
スコアリングのポイント:
English AIdolであなたのエッセイをAIで採点し、具体的なフィードバックを受け取りましょう。高得点を目指すための具体的なアドバイスを提供します。