IELTS Writing Task 2: Rehabilitation — Band 6-9 Samples

IELTS Writing Task 2 Rehabilitation Prompt

Many people think that governments should spend money on restoring historic buildings, while others believe that they should invest more in modern infrastructure. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

This is a common IELTS Writing Task 2 topic that tests your ability to discuss both sides of an argument and present a clear opinion. Below are sample answers at different band levels.

Band 6.0 Sample Answer

The government should spend money on both historic buildings and modern infrastructure.

Some people say that governments should spend money on restoring old buildings. They argue that historic buildings are important for the culture of a country. If we don’t take care of them, they will disappear. For example, in India, many old forts and palaces are falling apart. If the government doesn’t fix them, future generations won’t be able to see them.

On the other hand, others believe that governments should invest in modern infrastructure. They say that roads, hospitals, and schools are more important. For instance, in small towns, there are not enough good hospitals. If the government builds more hospitals, people will be healthier. Additionally, modern infrastructure can help the economy grow.

In my opinion, the government should spend money on both. Historic buildings are important for culture, but modern infrastructure is important for daily life. A balance is needed.

Scoring Breakdown (Band 6.0)

• Task Response (TR): The response presents a position but the arguments are not fully developed. (Band 6.0)
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): The ideas are organized but there is some repetition and lack of clear progression. (Band 6.0)
• Lexical Resource (LR): There is a mix of appropriate and less precise vocabulary. (Band 6.0)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): There are frequent grammatical errors that may hinder understanding. (Band 6.0)

Band 7.0 Sample Answer

Balancing the Restoration of Historic Buildings and Modern Infrastructure Development

The debate over whether governments should allocate funds to restore historic buildings or invest in modern infrastructure is a contentious one. Both perspectives have merit and should be considered.

Proponents of restoring historic buildings argue that these structures are integral to a nation’s cultural heritage. For instance, the Taj Mahal in Agra is not only a symbol of India’s rich history but also a significant source of revenue through tourism. Neglecting such monuments could lead to their deterioration and eventual loss. Furthermore, preserving historic buildings can foster a sense of national pride and identity.

Conversely, advocates for modern infrastructure contend that contemporary needs should take precedence. In rapidly urbanizing cities, the demand for efficient public transportation, healthcare facilities, and educational institutions is growing. For example, the Delhi Metro has revolutionized urban commuting, reducing traffic congestion and pollution. Investing in such projects can enhance the quality of life and boost economic productivity.

In my view, a balanced approach is essential. Governments should prioritize the restoration of historic buildings that hold significant cultural value while simultaneously investing in modern infrastructure to meet the evolving needs of society.

Scoring Breakdown (Band 7.0)

• Task Response (TR): The response presents a clear position with relevant arguments and examples. (Band 7.0)
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): The ideas are logically organized with clear progression. (Band 7.0)
• Lexical Resource (LR): There is a good range of vocabulary with some less common lexical items. (Band 7.0)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): There are some grammatical errors but they do not impede communication. (Band 7.0)

Band 8.0 Sample Answer

The Dilemma of Historic Preservation vs. Modern Infrastructure Development

The allocation of government funds for the restoration of historic buildings versus the development of modern infrastructure is a complex issue that requires careful consideration. Both options have significant implications for societal progress and cultural preservation.

Those who advocate for the restoration of historic buildings emphasize their cultural and historical significance. These structures often serve as tangible links to a nation’s past, fostering a sense of continuity and identity. For example, the Red Fort in Delhi is not only a UNESCO World Heritage Site but also a powerful symbol of India’s struggle for independence. Preserving such landmarks is crucial for maintaining cultural heritage and attracting tourism, which can stimulate economic growth.

On the other hand, proponents of modern infrastructure argue that contemporary societal needs must be addressed. Rapid urbanization and population growth necessitate the development of efficient public transportation systems, healthcare facilities, and educational institutions. For instance, the construction of high-speed rail networks has significantly reduced travel time and enhanced connectivity between major cities, facilitating economic development and social integration.

In my opinion, a balanced approach is necessary. Governments should prioritize the restoration of historic buildings that hold immense cultural value while simultaneously investing in modern infrastructure to meet the evolving needs of society. This dual approach ensures that both cultural heritage and contemporary progress are safeguarded.

Scoring Breakdown (Band 8.0)

• Task Response (TR): The response presents a clear and supported position with relevant arguments and examples. (Band 8.0)
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): The ideas are logically organized with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices. (Band 8.0)
• Lexical Resource (LR): There is a wide range of vocabulary with some sophisticated and less common lexical items. (Band 8.0)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): There are some grammatical errors but they are rare and do not impede communication. (Band 8.0)

Band 9.0 Sample Answer

Striking a Balance Between Cultural Heritage and Modern Development

The question of whether governments should prioritize the restoration of historic buildings or the development of modern infrastructure is a multifaceted issue that demands a nuanced approach. Both options offer distinct advantages and challenges that must be carefully weighed.

Advocates for the restoration of historic buildings highlight their invaluable cultural and historical significance. These structures often embody the artistic and architectural achievements of past civilizations, serving as vital educational resources and tourist attractions. For instance, the Qutub Minar in Delhi is not only a magnificent example of Indo-Islamic architecture but also a significant source of revenue through tourism. Preserving such landmarks is essential for maintaining cultural heritage and fostering national identity.

Conversely, proponents of modern infrastructure argue that contemporary societal needs must be addressed to ensure sustainable development. Rapid urbanization and technological advancements necessitate the development of efficient public transportation systems, healthcare facilities, and educational institutions. For example, the construction of smart cities equipped with advanced infrastructure can enhance the quality of life and boost economic productivity.

In my view, a balanced approach is imperative. Governments should allocate funds to restore historic buildings that hold immense cultural value while simultaneously investing in modern infrastructure to meet the evolving needs of society. This dual approach ensures that both cultural heritage and contemporary progress are safeguarded, fostering a harmonious and sustainable future.

Scoring Breakdown (Band 9.0)

• Task Response (TR): The response presents a clear and supported position with relevant arguments and examples. (Band 9.0)
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): The ideas are logically organized with clear progression and effective use of cohesive devices. (Band 9.0)
• Lexical Resource (LR): There is a wide range of vocabulary with sophisticated and less common lexical items used appropriately. (Band 9.0)
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): There are few grammatical errors and they do not impede communication. (Band 9.0)

Vocabulary Highlights

1. Restore (verb): to bring something back to its original state. Example: The government plans to restore the historic monument.
2. Infrastructure (noun): the basic physical and organizational structures and facilities needed for the operation of a society. Example: Modern infrastructure includes roads, bridges, and public transportation systems.
3. Cultural heritage (noun): the legacy of physical artifacts and intangible attributes of a group or society inherited from past generations. Example: The historic buildings are part of our cultural heritage.
4. Preserve (verb): to keep something in its original state or protect it from harm. Example: It is important to preserve historic sites for future generations.
5. Urbanization (noun): the process of developing an area to accommodate many residents in a relatively small area. Example: Rapid urbanization has led to a demand for better infrastructure.
6. Efficient (adjective): working or operating quickly and effectively in an organized way. Example: The new public transportation system is very efficient.
7. Economic productivity (noun): the ability of an economy to produce goods and services. Example: Investing in infrastructure can boost economic productivity.
8. Significant (adjective): important or noticeable. Example: The historic building has significant cultural value.
9. Sustainable (adjective): able to be maintained at a certain level without depleting natural resources. Example: Sustainable development is essential for the future.
10. Tourism (noun): the activity of traveling for pleasure. Example: Tourism is a major source of revenue for many countries.

Common Mistakes Students Make

1. Lack of Clear Position: Some students fail to present a clear opinion, making their response vague and unfocused.
2. Insufficient Examples: Providing only general statements without specific examples can weaken the argument.
3. Poor Organization: A disorganized response can make it difficult for the examiner to follow the argument.
4. Grammatical Errors: Frequent grammatical mistakes can lower the overall band score.
5. Overuse of Simple Vocabulary: Using basic vocabulary repeatedly can limit the lexical resource score.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect! Submit your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response to English AIdol’s AI scoring engine and get instant feedback on your Band score. Identify your strengths and areas for improvement with detailed metrics and actionable tips.