IELTS Writing Task 2: Climate Change — Band 6/7/8/9 Samples

Understanding the Prompt

Prompt: Some people believe that individuals should be responsible for fighting climate change, while others think that governments and large corporations should take the lead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 Answer

Scrore Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 5.0 - Presents a relevant position but does not extend or support it fully.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 6.0 - Ideas are arranged in a logical order but there is some repetition and lack of clear progression.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 6.0 - Uses a mix of appropriate and less accurate vocabulary.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 6.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with frequent errors.

Answer:

Climate change is a big problem today. Some people think that everyone should help to stop it. Others believe that only governments and big companies should do something. I think both are important.

Individuals can do many things to help the environment. They can use less plastic, recycle, and drive less. These small actions can make a big difference. For example, if everyone recycles, there will be less waste. But some people say that this is not enough. They think that governments and companies must do more.

Governments can make laws to protect the environment. They can also give money to find new ways to use clean energy. Big companies can change how they make things to be more eco-friendly. For example, they can use less pollution. If companies and governments work together, they can make a big change.

In conclusion, both individuals and governments should work to fight climate change. Individuals can start with small actions, but governments and companies must do more to make a real difference.

Band 7.0 Answer

Scrore Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 7.0 - Presents a clear position throughout the response and extends and supports main trends.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 7.0 - Uses a clear progression of ideas but may have some unnecessary repetition.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 7.0 - Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 7.0 - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms but with some errors.

Answer:

Climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time. There is an ongoing debate about who should take the lead in addressing this global challenge. While some argue that individuals must take responsibility, others believe that governments and corporations should be at the forefront of the fight against climate change.

On one hand, individuals can make a significant impact by adopting eco-friendly practices. Simple actions such as reducing, reusing, and recycling can collectively make a substantial difference. For instance, using public transportation instead of driving alone can significantly reduce carbon emissions. Additionally, individuals can influence others by raising awareness about the importance of environmental conservation. However, critics argue that individual efforts are not enough to tackle the scale of the problem.

On the other hand, governments and large corporations have the resources and influence to implement large-scale solutions. Governments can enact policies that promote renewable energy and regulate industrial emissions. For example, the Paris Agreement is a global effort led by governments to combat climate change. Corporations, on the other hand, can invest in sustainable practices and innovative technologies that reduce their environmental footprint. For instance, companies like Tesla are pioneering electric vehicles, which are a cleaner alternative to traditional cars.

In my opinion, both individuals and governments and corporations must work together to address climate change. While individual actions are important, they are not sufficient on their own. Governments and corporations have the power to implement widespread changes that can have a more significant impact. Therefore, a collaborative effort is essential to combat climate change effectively.

Band 8.0 Answer

Scrore Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 8.0 - Presents a clear position throughout the response and extends and supports main trends with relevant, understated, and supported ideas.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 8.0 - Uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 8.0 - Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 8.0 - Uses a sufficient range of complex sentence forms to communicate with some flexibility and precision.

Answer:

The imperative to mitigate climate change has sparked a contentious debate regarding the primary agents of change. While some advocate for individual responsibility, others contend that governments and corporations bear the greater burden. This essay will explore both perspectives before advocating for a concerted effort.

Proponents of individual responsibility argue that collective small-scale actions can yield significant environmental benefits. For instance, reducing plastic consumption and embracing sustainable transportation options can collectively curtail carbon emissions. Moreover, individuals can exert pressure on policymakers and corporations through advocacy and consumer choices. However, skeptics posit that individual efforts are akin to a drop in the bucket, given the scale of the climate crisis.

Conversely, proponents of governmental and corporate responsibility highlight the disproportionate impact of these entities on the environment. Governments possess the legislative power to enact sweeping environmental policies, such as carbon taxes and renewable energy incentives. Corporations, with their substantial resources, can drive innovation in green technologies and sustainable practices. For example, Patagonia's commitment to environmental activism and sustainable business practices serves as a compelling case study.

In conclusion, while individual actions are laudable and necessary, they are insufficient to tackle the magnitude of climate change. Governments and corporations, with their extensive resources and influence, must spearhead the charge. However, a collaborative approach, where individuals, governments, and corporations work in tandem, is the most efficacious strategy to combat climate change effectively.

Band 9.0 Answer

Scrore Breakdown:

• Task Response (TR): 9.0 - Presents a clear position throughout the response and extends and supports main trends with relevant, understated, and supported ideas.
• Coherence and Cohesion (CC): 9.0 - Uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention.
• Lexical Resource (LR): 9.0 - Uses a wide range of vocabulary with great flexibility and precision.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): 9.0 - Uses a wide range of complex sentence forms to communicate with full flexibility and precision.

Answer:

The anthropogenic climate crisis has ignited a fervent debate regarding the locus of responsibility for its mitigation. While some espouse the primacy of individual action, others posit that the onus lies with governments and corporations. This essay will dissect both viewpoints before advocating for a synergistic approach.

Advocates of individual responsibility contend that the aggregation of personal actions can engender substantial environmental benefits. For instance, the adoption of plant-based diets can significantly reduce one's carbon footprint. Furthermore, individuals can catalyze systemic change through activism and conscious consumerism. However, detractors argue that such efforts are akin to rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic, given the systemic nature of the climate crisis.

Conversely, proponents of governmental and corporate responsibility underscore the disproportionate environmental impact of these entities. Governments, with their legislative authority, can institute far-reaching policies, such as cap-and-trade systems and subsidies for renewable energy. Corporations, with their substantial resources, can spearhead technological innovation and sustainable practices. For example, Microsoft's ambitious plan to become carbon negative by 2030 exemplifies corporate leadership in climate action.

In my view, while individual actions are commendable and necessary, they are insufficient to address the existential threat of climate change. Governments and corporations, with their extensive resources and influence, must take the reins. However, a collaborative approach, where individuals, governments, and corporations work in concert, is the most efficacious strategy to avert climatic catastrophe.

Key Vocabulary

1. Anthropogenic (adjective): caused or influenced by human beings.

• Example: The anthropogenic climate crisis is a result of human activities.

1. Mitigate (verb): make less severe, serious, or painful.

• Example: We need to mitigate the effects of climate change.

1. Spearhead (verb): lead or initiate.

• Example: Governments must spearhead the fight against climate change.

1. Efficacy (noun): the ability to produce a desired or intended result.

• Example: The efficacy of individual actions in combating climate change is limited.

1. Synergistic (adjective): involving the interaction of two or more agents or forces so that their combined effect is greater than the sum of their individual effects.

• Example: A synergistic approach is necessary to tackle climate change.

1. Catalyze (verb): cause or accelerate a significant change or reaction.

• Example: Individuals can catalyze systemic change through activism.

1. Disproportionate (adjective): too large or too small in comparison with something else.

• Example: Governments have a disproportionate impact on the environment.

1. Institute (verb): establish or introduce something.

• Example: Governments can institute policies to combat climate change.

1. Far-reaching (adjective): having important effects or consequences over a wide area or on many people.

• Example: The government's new environmental policies are far-reaching.

1. Subsidies (noun): a grant or gift of money.

• Example: Subsidies for renewable energy can promote its use.

1. Innovation (noun): the introduction of new things or methods.

• Example: Corporations can drive innovation in green technologies.

1. Sustainable (adjective): able to be maintained at a certain rate or level without depleting natural resources.

• Example: Sustainable practices are essential for environmental conservation.

1. Conscious consumerism (noun): the practice of being aware of the impact of one's purchases on the environment and society.

• Example: Conscious consumerism can drive companies to adopt eco-friendly practices.

1. Aggregation (noun): the act or process of gathering something together.

• Example: The aggregation of individual actions can have a significant impact.

1. Existential (adjective): relating to existence.

• Example: Climate change poses an existential threat to humanity.

1. Catastrophe (noun): an event causing great and often sudden damage or distress.

• Example: We must avert climatic catastrophe.

1. Locus (noun): the place or point at which something occurs or is centered.

• Example: The locus of responsibility for climate action is debated.

1. Onus (noun): something that is one's duty or responsibility.

• Example: The onus lies with governments to combat climate change.

1. Detractors (noun): a person who disparages someone or something.

• Example: Detractors argue that individual efforts are insufficient.

1. Ambiguous (adjective): not clear or decided.

• Example: The role of individuals in climate action is often ambiguous.

Common Mistakes

1. Overgeneralization: Students often make sweeping statements without providing sufficient evidence or examples. Ensure that your arguments are supported by relevant and specific evidence.

1. Lack of Clarity: Some students fail to clearly state their position or present a coherent argument. Make sure your essay has a clear thesis statement and that each paragraph supports this thesis.

1. Poor Vocabulary Choices: Using vague or inappropriate vocabulary can weaken your argument. Always use precise and relevant vocabulary to convey your ideas effectively.

1. Grammatical Errors: Frequent grammatical errors can distract the reader and lower your score. Proofread your essay to ensure that it is free of grammatical mistakes.

1. Irrelevant Information: Including information that does not directly address the prompt can weaken your response. Stay focused on the task and avoid digressing from the main topic.

Conclusion

Understanding how to approach IELTS Writing Task 2 on climate change can significantly improve your score. By studying high-scoring model answers, expanding your vocabulary, and avoiding common mistakes, you can develop the skills needed to excel in this section of the exam. Practice regularly and seek feedback to continuously improve your writing.

Get your own response scored by AI on English AIdol.