AI-powered learning English

English guide

نمونه رایتینگ آیلتس Task 2:
Family — نمره ۹ با توضیح فارسی

نمونه رایتینگ آیلتس Task 2: Family با نمره ۹ و توضیحات کامل. یادگیری رایتینگ آیلتس تسک ۲ با نمونه‌های مختلف نمره.

نمونه رایتینگ آیلتس Task 2: Family — نمره ۹ با توضیح فارسی | English AIdol Blog

What this guide covers

Search answer

What this page helps you decide

نمونه رایتینگ آیلتس Task 2: Family با نمره ۹ و توضیحات کامل. یادگیری رایتینگ آیلتس تسک ۲ با نمونه‌های مختلف نمره.

Focus Quick answer
Includes 2026 update
Best for Practical checklist
Next step Related practice
  1. Scan the direct answer first.
  2. Check examples or score rules.
  3. Open the related practice page.

نمونه رایتینگ آیلتس Task 2: Family — نمره ۹ با توضیح فارسی

نمونه سوالات IELTS Writing Task 2: Family

  1. Some people believe that it is wrong to keep wild animals in zoos, while others think that zoos are both educational and entertaining. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
  2. In many countries today, people in large cities rather than small towns do not know their neighbors. What are the causes of this? What are the effects on society?
  3. Some people think that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the local environment). To what extent do you agree or disagree?

نمونه پاسخ‌ها

نمونه پاسخ نمره ۶.۰

The question of whether people should live with their parents or move out to live independently is a contentious one. While some argue that living with parents is beneficial, others believe that moving out is necessary for personal growth.

Living with parents has its advantages. Firstly, it can save money, as living independently can be expensive. Secondly, parents can provide emotional support and guidance. However, there are also disadvantages. For instance, living with parents may limit personal freedom and independence. Additionally, conflicts may arise due to differences in opinions and lifestyles.

On the other hand, moving out to live independently can foster personal growth. It teaches responsibility and self-reliance. However, it can also be challenging, as it requires managing finances, household chores, and other responsibilities. Moreover, it can be lonely and isolating.

In conclusion, both living with parents and moving out have their pros and cons. It ultimately depends on individual circumstances and personal preferences.

Scoring Breakdown:

  • Task Response (TR): ۵.۰ - Addresses the task but may not fully cover all parts of the question.
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): ۶.۰ - Ideas are presented in a logical order, but there may be some lapses in cohesion.
  • Lexical Resource (LR): ۶.۰ - Uses a mix of simple and complex vocabulary but may make some errors.
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): ۶.۰ - Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures but may make some grammatical errors.

نمونه پاسخ نمره ۷.۰

The issue of whether people should prioritize family obligations over personal goals is a complex one. While some argue that family should come first, others believe that personal goals are equally important.

Prioritizing family obligations has its merits. Family members often rely on each other for emotional and financial support. Neglecting family duties can lead to strained relationships and feelings of guilt. For example, a person who consistently puts their career ahead of family responsibilities may find themselves isolated from their loved ones.

However, personal goals are also crucial. Pursuing one's passions and ambitions can lead to a sense of fulfillment and self-worth. For instance, an individual who dedicates themselves to their career may achieve professional success and financial stability. Balancing family obligations and personal goals is essential for overall well-being.

In conclusion, both family obligations and personal goals are important. It is crucial to find a balance between the two to lead a fulfilling life.

Scoring Breakdown:

  • Task Response (TR): ۷.۰ - Fully addresses the task and covers all parts of the question.
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): ۷.۰ - Ideas are presented in a clear and logical manner with effective use of cohesive devices.
  • Lexical Resource (LR): ۷.۰ - Uses a range of vocabulary appropriately but may make some minor errors.
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): ۷.۰ - Uses a variety of sentence structures with good control of grammar but may make some minor errors.

نمونه پاسخ نمره ۸.۰

The debate over whether traditional family structures are better than modern family dynamics is a contentious one. While some argue that traditional family structures provide stability and security, others believe that modern family dynamics offer more flexibility and individuality.

Traditional family structures, characterized by clearly defined roles and responsibilities, have been the norm for centuries. These structures provide a sense of stability and security. For example, in many cultures, the father is the primary breadwinner, while the mother is the primary caregiver. This division of labor can create a stable and predictable environment for children.

However, modern family dynamics are more fluid and diverse. Single-parent families, blended families, and same-sex parent families are becoming increasingly common. These family structures offer more flexibility and individuality. For instance, in a single-parent family, the parent may need to take on multiple roles, such as breadwinner and caregiver. This can foster resilience and adaptability in children.

Moreover, modern family dynamics often prioritize open communication and emotional support. This can lead to stronger and more meaningful relationships. For example, in a blended family, step-siblings may form close bonds through shared experiences and mutual support.

In conclusion, both traditional family structures and modern family dynamics have their advantages. The key is to find a balance that works for each individual family.

Scoring Breakdown:

  • Task Response (TR): ۸.۰ - Fully addresses the task and presents a clear position with relevant examples.
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): ۸.۰ - Ideas are presented in a well-organized and coherent manner with effective use of cohesive devices.
  • Lexical Resource (LR): ۸.۰ - Uses a wide range of vocabulary appropriately with good control of collocation and idiomatic language.
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): ۸.۰ - Uses a variety of complex sentence structures with good control of grammar.

نمونه پاسخ نمره ۹.۰

The notion that family bonds are weakening in modern society has been a topic of much debate. While some attribute this to the fast-paced nature of contemporary life, others argue that it is a result of shifting cultural values.

The erosion of family bonds in modern society can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, the fast-paced nature of contemporary life leaves little time for family interactions. With both parents often working full-time, there is less opportunity for quality family time. Secondly, the rise of individualism has led to a focus on personal goals and ambitions, often at the expense of family responsibilities. For instance, young adults may prioritize their careers over spending time with their parents.

Moreover, technological advancements have changed the way we communicate. While technology has made it easier to stay connected, it has also led to a decline in face-to-face interactions. For example, family members may prefer to communicate via social media rather than spending time together in person.

However, it is essential to recognize that family bonds are not inherently weakening. Rather, they are evolving. Modern families are finding new ways to stay connected and support each other. For instance, regular family gatherings and virtual meetings can help maintain strong family ties.

In conclusion, while it is true that family bonds are changing in modern society, it is not accurate to say that they are weakening. Instead, they are adapting to the demands of contemporary life. It is crucial to find ways to maintain and strengthen family connections in the face of these changes.

Scoring Breakdown:

  • Task Response (TR): ۹.۰ - Fully addresses the task and presents a clear, supported position with relevant, extended, and supported ideas.
  • Coherence and Cohesion (CC): ۹.۰ - Ideas are presented in a logical and coherent manner with effective use of cohesive devices.
  • Lexical Resource (LR): ۹.۰ - Uses a wide range of vocabulary appropriately with good control of collocation and idiomatic language.
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy (GRA): ۹.۰ - Uses a variety of complex sentence structures with good control of grammar.

واژگان مفید

  1. Contentious (adj.): متقارن
  • مثال: This is a contentious issue.
  1. Beneficial (adj.): مفید
  • مثال: Living with parents can be beneficial.
  1. Independence (n.): استقلال
  • مثال: Moving out fosters independence.
  1. Isolating (adj.): انزوا
  • مثال: Living alone can be isolating.
  1. Duties (n.): وظایف
  • مثال: Family duties include supporting each other.
  1. Fulfillment (n.): رضایت
  • مثال: Pursuing personal goals can lead to fulfillment.
  1. Strained (adj.): تیره
  • مثال: Neglecting family can lead to strained relationships.
  1. Resilience (n.): مقاومت
  • مثال: Single-parent families can foster resilience.
  1. Adaptability (n.): سازگاری
  • مثال: Modern families require adaptability.
  1. Erosion (n.): تضعیف
  • مثال: The erosion of family bonds is a concern.
  1. Individualism (n.): فردگرایی
  • مثال: The rise of individualism affects family dynamics.
  1. Ambitions (n.): آرزوهای بزرگ
  • مثال: Young adults may prioritize their ambitions.
  1. Advancements (n.): پیشرفت‌ها
  • مثال: Technological advancements change communication.
  1. Interactions (n.): interactions
  • مثال: Quality family interactions are important.
  1. Gatherings (n.): اجتماعات
  • مثال: Regular family gatherings maintain strong ties.

5 خطای شایع در رایتینگ آیلتس Task 2: Family

  1. نوشتن بدون ساختار: بسیاری از دانش آموزان بدون ساختار واضح می‌نویسند که باعث می‌شود متن آنها غیر متقارن و بدون منطق باشد.
  2. استفاده از واژگان محدود: استفاده از واژگان محدود باعث می‌شود که پاسخ شما کم رنگ و تکراری باشد.
  3. نوشتن بدون مثال: بدون ارائه مثال‌های concrete، پاسخ شما ممکن است ضعیف و نامناسبی باشد.
  4. نوشتن بیش از حد: برخی دانش آموزان به دلیل تلاش برای افزایش طول متن، به نوشتن بی‌معنی می‌پردازند.
  5. نوشتن بدون مراجعه به سوالات: برخی از دانش آموزان به جای پاسخ دادن به سوال، به موضوعات دیگر می‌پردازند.

Get your own response scored by AI on English AIdol