English guide
Get a Band 9.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer on social inequality with detailed scoring breakdowns and expert tips. Ace your essay!
What this guide covers
Search answer
Get a Band 9.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer on social inequality with detailed scoring breakdowns and expert tips. Ace your essay!
Related guides:
Some people believe that the government should address social inequality by providing free education and healthcare for all. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Response:
The government should help poor people by giving them free education and healthcare. This is good because poor people cannot afford these things, and it will help them get better jobs. If people are healthy and educated, they can work hard and make more money. Also, when people are sick, they might not be able to work, so free healthcare is important. Some people say that this costs too much money, but I think it is worth it because everyone should have the same chances. In countries where this happens, like some in Europe, people are generally happier and healthier. So, I agree that the government should do this.
Scoring Breakdown:
Response:
While some argue that addressing social inequality through free education and healthcare is an overreach of government responsibility, I firmly believe these measures are essential for creating a more equitable society. Education is a fundamental right that empowers individuals to escape poverty cycles. For instance, countries with robust public education systems, such as Finland, demonstrate higher social mobility and lower income disparities. Similarly, universal healthcare ensures that illness does not disproportionately affect the poor, who often lack financial safety nets. Critics may claim these policies are financially unsustainable, but the long-term benefits—such as a healthier, more productive workforce—outweigh the costs. Governments have a moral obligation to reduce inequality, and free access to education and healthcare are proven strategies to achieve this.
Scoring Breakdown:
Response:
The notion that governments should mitigate social inequality through free education and healthcare is a contentious one, but I contend that these policies are not only feasible but also morally imperative. Education serves as the great equalizer, providing individuals with the tools to compete in the job market on a level playing field. Research indicates that nations investing heavily in public education, such as South Korea, exhibit lower income inequality and stronger economic growth. Healthcare, similarly, is a fundamental human right that should not be contingent on one’s financial status. The World Health Organization has repeatedly highlighted that universal healthcare reduces economic disparities by preventing medical bankruptcy among low-income families. While detractors argue that such initiatives strain public finances, the evidence suggests that the societal benefits—such as reduced crime rates and increased tax revenues from a more educated workforce—far outweigh the costs. Governments must prioritize these policies to foster a more just and equitable society.
Scoring Breakdown:
Response:
The disparity in wealth distribution has become a pervasive issue, with the gap between the rich and poor widening at an alarming rate, particularly in urban centers. This inequality is exacerbated by systemic barriers and insufficient social policies. To address this, governments must prioritize equitable access to education and healthcare, as these are foundational to social mobility. Education is not merely a tool for economic advancement but a fundamental right that democratizes opportunity. Nations like Finland and Canada have demonstrated that robust public education systems correlate with lower income inequality and higher social cohesion. Similarly, universal healthcare ensures that economic status does not dictate health outcomes, a principle upheld by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Critics may argue that these policies are economically burdensome, but the long-term societal benefits—including a more productive workforce and reduced public health expenditures—justify the investment. Furthermore, the moral imperative cannot be ignored: a just society is one that provides equal opportunities for all its citizens. Governments that fail to implement these measures risk perpetuating cycles of poverty and inequality, undermining social stability and economic progress.
Scoring Breakdown:
| Word/phrase | Definition | Example Collocation | |-------------|------------|-------------------| | Disparity | A difference, especially an unfair one | wealth disparity, income disparity | | Exacerbate | To make a problem worse | exacerbate inequality, exacerbate poverty | | Systemic | Relating to a system, often referring to deep-rooted issues | systemic barriers, systemic inequality | | Social mobility | The ability of individuals to move up or down the social ladder | social mobility, limited social mobility | | Democratize | To make something accessible to everyone | democratize education, democratize opportunity | | Cohesion | The state of being united or connected | social cohesion, community cohesion | | Moral imperative | A strong sense of duty or obligation | moral imperative, ethical imperative | | Perpetuate | To cause something to continue, especially something undesirable | perpetuate poverty, perpetuate inequality | | Robust | Strong and effective | robust policies, robust education system | | Contingent | Dependent on something else | contingent on, contingent upon |
Achieving a Band 9.0 in IELTS Writing Task 2 requires a combination of clear argumentation, sophisticated vocabulary, and flawless grammar. By studying high-scoring model answers and practicing with real prompts, you can refine your skills and approach the exam with confidence.
Get your own response scored by AI on English AIdol