AI-powered learning English

English guide

IELTS Writing Task 2:
Public Transport - Band 9.0 Sample with Full Breakdown

See a Band 9.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 public transport essay with detailed scoring breakdown. Achieve expert-level writing skills with this model answer.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Public Transport - Band 9.0 Sample with Full Breakdown | English AIdol Blog

What this guide covers

Search answer

What this page helps you decide

See a Band 9.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 public transport essay with detailed scoring breakdown. Achieve expert-level writing skills with this model answer.

Focus Quick answer
Includes 2026 update
Best for Practical checklist
Next step Related practice
  1. Scan the direct answer first.
  2. Check examples or score rules.
  3. Open the related practice page.

IELTS Writing Task 2: Public Transport - Band 9.0 Sample with Full Breakdown

Related guides:

Prompt

Some people believe that governments should invest more money in improving public transportation systems. Others argue that individuals should be responsible for their own transportation needs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answers

Band 6.0 - Limited Response

The government should spend more on public transport.

There are many people who think that the government should put more money into public transport. I agree with this because it helps the environment and makes people's lives easier.

Firstly, public transport is good for the environment. Cars cause pollution, but buses and trains are cleaner. If more people use public transport, there will be less pollution. Secondly, public transport makes life easier. People can get to work without driving, which saves time and money.

However, some people say that individuals should take care of their own transport. They think that people should buy their own cars or bikes. But this is not always possible for everyone, especially those who cannot afford it.

In my opinion, the government should invest more in public transport. It is better for the environment and helps more people.

Scoring Breakdown

  • Task Response 5: Presents a position but with limited development.
  • Coherence & Cohesion 5: Ideas are logically ordered but with some repetition and lack of referential links.
  • Lexical Resource 5: Uses some less common vocabulary but with some errors and limited range.
  • Grammar Range & Accuracy 5: Mostly simple sentences with some complex attempts that are not always accurate.

Band 7.0 - Adequate Response

Government Investment in Public Transportation versus Personal Responsibility

The debate over whether governments should invest more in public transportation or individuals should handle their own transportation needs is contentious. Both perspectives have merit, but I firmly believe that government intervention is more beneficial.

On one hand, those who advocate for personal responsibility argue that individuals should have the freedom to choose their preferred mode of transportation. They contend that this encourages personal accountability and allows for greater flexibility. For instance, owning a car provides convenience and independence. Furthermore, some argue that government investment in public transport may lead to higher taxes, which could be burdensome for citizens.

However, I contend that government investment in public transport offers more advantages. Firstly, it reduces traffic congestion and environmental pollution. For example, cities with efficient public transport systems, such as Tokyo and London, have lower levels of air pollution. Secondly, it promotes social equity by providing affordable transportation options for all citizens, regardless of their income level. For instance, many low-income individuals rely on public transport to commute to work.

In conclusion, while personal responsibility has its merits, the government should prioritize investment in public transportation to address environmental and social issues.

Scoring Breakdown

  • Task Response 7: Presents a clear position with relevant, extended arguments.
  • Coherence & Cohesion 7: Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and some use of cohesive devices.
  • Lexical Resource 7: Uses a mix of common and less common vocabulary with some flexibility and appropriateness.
  • Grammar Range & Accuracy 7: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with some errors but generally accurate.

Band 8.0 - Good Response

The Imperative of Government Investment in Public Transportation

The efficacy of government investment in public transportation versus the emphasis on individual responsibility remains a contentious issue. While personal choice in transportation is valuable, the benefits of government intervention in this sector are more compelling.

Proponents of personal responsibility argue that individuals should bear the cost and responsibility of their transportation needs. They assert that this approach fosters self-reliance and reduces the burden on public finances. For example, those who can afford it may prefer to own private vehicles, which offer convenience and privacy. Additionally, some contend that government investment in public transport may lead to inefficiencies and waste of resources.

However, the advantages of government investment in public transportation are manifold. Firstly, it mitigates traffic congestion and reduces greenhouse gas emissions. For instance, cities with well-developed public transport systems, such as Singapore and Berlin, have significantly lower carbon footprints. Secondly, it enhances social mobility by providing affordable and accessible transportation options for all segments of society. For example, students and low-income workers heavily rely on public transport to access education and employment opportunities.

Moreover, government investment in public transportation can stimulate economic growth. The construction and maintenance of public transport infrastructure create jobs and boost local economies. For instance, the expansion of the London Underground has generated numerous employment opportunities and contributed to the city's economic development.

In conclusion, while personal responsibility in transportation is important, the government should prioritize investment in public transportation to address environmental, social, and economic challenges.

Scoring Breakdown

  • Task Response 8: Presents a clear position with fully developed arguments and relevant examples.
  • Coherence & Cohesion 8: Ideas are logically organized with clear progression and a wide range of cohesive devices.
  • Lexical Resource 8: Uses a wide range of vocabulary with flexibility and precision.
  • Grammar Range & Accuracy 8: Uses a wide range of complex sentence forms with generally accurate grammar.

Band 9.0 - Expert Response

The Paradox of Prioritizing Personal Transportation over Public Investment

The discourse surrounding the allocation of resources for public transportation versus the promotion of individual transportation solutions is multifaceted. While personal autonomy in transportation choices is laudable, the strategic investment by governments in public transportation infrastructure is indispensable for sustainable urban development.

Advocates for personal transportation solutions posit that individuals should bear the responsibility for their mobility needs. They argue that this approach encourages personal accountability and reduces the fiscal burden on governments. For instance, the proliferation of electric vehicles and bike-sharing programs exemplifies the potential for innovative, individually-driven transportation solutions. Furthermore, they contend that government intervention may lead to bureaucratic inefficiencies and stifle market-driven innovations.

However, the case for government investment in public transportation is compelling. Firstly, it is instrumental in mitigating the environmental impact of urbanization. For example, the implementation of the High-Speed Rail network in China has significantly reduced carbon emissions by providing a sustainable alternative to air travel. Secondly, it fosters social inclusivity by ensuring that transportation is accessible to all socioeconomic strata. For instance, the subsidized public transport system in Hong Kong has been pivotal in maintaining its status as one of the world's most livable cities.

Moreover, government investment in public transportation can catalyze economic growth and urban regeneration. The development of the Melbourne Metro, for example, has not only improved connectivity but also revitalized surrounding neighborhoods, attracting businesses and residents. Furthermore, it enhances public health by promoting active commuting and reducing sedentary lifestyles.

In essence, while personal transportation solutions have their merits, the strategic investment in public transportation by governments is essential for achieving environmental sustainability, social equity, and economic prosperity.

Scoring Breakdown

  • Task Response 9: Presents a clear position with fully developed arguments and relevant, extended examples.
  • Coherence & Cohesion 9: Ideas are logically organized with a clear progression and a wide range of cohesive devices used appropriately.
  • Lexical Resource 9: Uses a wide range of vocabulary with full flexibility and precision, including idiomatic and less common lexical items.
  • Grammar Range & Accuracy 9: Uses a wide range of complex sentence forms with full flexibility and accuracy, demonstrating a high degree of sophistication.

Vocabulary Highlights

  1. Contentious - causing or likely to cause an argument; controversial (e.g., a contentious issue).
  2. Merit - the quality of being deserving of reward or praise (e.g., both perspectives have merit).
  3. Intervention - the action or process of intervening (e.g., government intervention).
  4. Mitigates - to make less severe, serious, or painful (e.g., mitigates traffic congestion).
  5. Manifold - many and various (e.g., manifold advantages).
  6. Stimulate - to encourage development or increase in something (e.g., stimulate economic growth).
  7. Proliferation - rapid increase in the number or amount of something (e.g., proliferation of electric vehicles).
  8. Instrumental - serving as a means of accomplishing a purpose (e.g., instrumental in mitigating environmental impact).
  9. Inclusivity - the practice of providing equal access to opportunities and resources for people who might otherwise be excluded or marginalized (e.g., fosters social inclusivity).
  10. Catalyze - to cause or accelerate a significant change or reaction (e.g., catalyze economic growth).
  11. Urbanization - the process of developing an area of land for use as a city or town (e.g., the environmental impact of urbanization).
  12. Socioeconomic - relating to the interaction of social and economic factors (e.g., socioeconomic strata).
  13. Regeneration - the action or process of regenerating or being regenerated (e.g., urban regeneration).
  14. Sedentary - involving little exercise or physical activity (e.g., sedentary lifestyles).
  15. Essence - the intrinsic nature or indispensable quality of something (e.g., in essence, the strategic investment is essential).
  16. Sustainable - able to be maintained at a certain rate or level without depleting natural resources (e.g., sustainable alternative).
  17. Autonomy - the right or condition of self-government (e.g., personal autonomy in transportation choices).
  18. Proliferation - rapid increase in the number or amount of something (e.g., proliferation of electric vehicles).
  19. Bureaucratic - relating to a system of government in which most of the important decisions are taken by state officials rather than by elected representatives (e.g., bureaucratic inefficiencies).
  20. Strata - a layer of rock or soil with internally consistent characteristics that distinguishes it from other layers (e.g., socioeconomic strata).

Common Mistakes

  1. Overgeneralizing: Making sweeping statements without sufficient evidence or examples. Avoid using terms like 'all' or 'none' without qualification.
  2. Lack of Cohesion: Failing to connect ideas logically. Use linking words and phrases to guide the reader through your argument.
  3. Repetition: Repeating the same vocabulary or phrases. Aim for a range of vocabulary to demonstrate lexical resource.
  4. Incorrect Tense Usage: Mixing tenses unnecessarily. Maintain consistency in tense throughout your essay.
  5. Ignoring the Prompt: Failing to address both sides of the argument. Ensure you discuss both views as instructed.

Get Your Own Response Scored by AI on English AIdol

Practice makes perfect. Get your own IELTS Writing Task 2 response scored by AI on English AIdol and receive detailed feedback to help you achieve your target band score.