General guide
Editorial, Sources, Translation, and Corrections Policy
English AIdol applies a review standard for accurate exam guidance, transparent AI assistance, multilingual publication, commercial comparisons, and material corrections.
What this guide covers
Start here
What you get on this page
English AIdol applies a review standard for accurate exam guidance, transparent AI assistance, multilingual publication, commercial comparisons, and material corrections.
Focus
Targeted practice
Includes
AI feedback
Best for
Clear explanations
Next step
Fast start
- Choose the closest goal.
- Complete one focused task.
- Review mistakes before moving on.
Purpose and Independence
English AIdol publishes independent study and exam-practice guidance. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by IELTS, ETS, Pearson, or other exam owners. Official providers, regulators, governments, universities, and receiving organisations remain the source of truth for current formats, fees, eligibility, acceptance, and decisions.
Source and Review Standard
Exam-format, scoring, booking, immigration, registration, and admissions claims should cite the organisation responsible for the information. Volatile facts receive shorter review intervals. An editor must verify the source, date, scope, and wording before publication.
Commercial comparisons disclose English AIdol's interest, explain the method, use the same test conditions, and separate observed facts from editorial judgement. English AIdol does not buy rankings, manufacture reviews, trade links for favourable coverage, or present an unpublished accuracy result as established evidence.
AI-Assisted Work
AI may help organise sources, create a draft, suggest examples, translate text, or run deterministic checks. It can also invent facts and citations. Human approval remains required, and high-stakes claims must be checked against primary sources. AI-generated practice scores are estimates, not official results.
Multilingual Publication
Every locale must pass source binding, deterministic validation, and an automated locale review covering meaning, terminology, numbers, links, metadata, and locale-specific claims. English AIdol does not describe those machine checks as native-human review. A qualified native-human reviewer is mandatory for the high-risk slots flagged in the editorial plan and is recorded separately. Other locales may publish after the automated gates and owner approval; any version that fails a gate remains unpublished.
Corrections
Send a correction request to [email protected] with the page URL, disputed text, and supporting source. Material errors are assessed, corrected, and recorded when the change could affect a learner's decision.
Policy effective: 11 July 2026. Next scheduled review: 11 January 2027.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does English AIdol use AI to help create content?
AI may assist research organisation, drafting, translation, or quality checks. Exam facts, high-stakes claims, sources, and publication decisions require human review. AI assistance is not presented as expert authorship.
Which sources does English AIdol prioritise?
Current primary sources from exam owners, regulators, governments, and receiving institutions take priority. Secondary sources may add context but do not override the organisation responsible for the rule or test.
How are translations reviewed?
Every translation must pass source binding, deterministic checks, and automated locale review. High-risk flagged slots also require a recorded qualified native-human review; a version that fails any required gate remains unpublished.
How can I report an error?
Email [email protected] with the page URL, the sentence in question, and a supporting source. Material corrections should be logged and reflected in the page review date.